Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which alternative well-fit masks can be used in medical procedures?
Thapthim-On, Maturin; Chaiear, Naesinee; Mitsungnern, Thapanawong.
Afiliação
  • Thapthim-On M; Department of Community, Family, and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand. Electronic address: maturin.t@kkumail.com.
  • Chaiear N; Department of Community, Family, and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand. Electronic address: naesinee@kku.ac.th.
  • Mitsungnern T; Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand. Electronic address: thapanawong@kku.ac.th.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(2): 204-211, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38113817
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the WHO and CDC recommended that healthcare personnel (HCPs) performing non-aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) don a properly fitted mask. We aimed to evaluate the fit factors (FFs) of eight alternative well-fit masks (AWMs) used by Thai HCPs.

METHODS:

This comparative descriptive study was conducted on 33 HCPs between October and November 2022, categorized into three facial sizes small, medium, and large. Each participant wore eight types of AWMs in random order medical mask under adjustable ear-loop (AEL)-KF94 (MK), medical mask under AEL-KN95 with a hook (MN), medical mask under fabric mask (MF), AEL- KF94 (KF94), AEL-KF94 under fabric masks (KF), AEL-KF94 with a hook (KF94H), AEL-KN95 with a hook (KN95), and AEL-KN95 with a hook under fabric mask (NF). FFs were measured using a quantitative fit test.

RESULTS:

The respective number of HCPs wearing small, medium, and large was 12, 12, and 9, and the mean±SD of face width and length was 132.98 ± 10.49 and 114.92 ± 10.10 mm. The highest respective median of FF was KN95 = 200, NF= 200, MN= 185, and KF94H = 171, and the respective passing fit-test rate was 97%, 84.8%, 63.6%, and 60.6%. There was no difference in FFs between the N95 and KN95 (p=0.72), the N95 and NF (p=0.202), and the three face sizes. Moreover, KF94H pass rates were significantly higher for females compared to males (OR = 13.3; p = 0.001) and for small facial sizes compared to either medium or large sizes (OR = 14.7; p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION:

The AEL-KN95 with hook and sponge at the nosepiece is an effective respirator for use by HCPs in non-AGPs, as the FF and fit test pass rates were comparable to those of N95, and there were no differences in FFs between facial sizes. However, the female who had a small face size may use a KF94H as an alternative PPE.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória / COVID-19 Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Public Health Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dispositivos de Proteção Respiratória / COVID-19 Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Public Health Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article