Provider Perceptions Regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Surgical Patients with Frailty.
Ann Surg
; 2024 Jan 23.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38258581
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To characterize the perceptions of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and geriatricians regarding perioperative CPR in surgical patients with frailty. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The population of patients undergoing surgery is growing older and more frail. Despite a growing focus on goal-concordant care, frailty assessment, and debate regarding the appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in patients with frailty, providers' views regarding frailty and perioperative CPR are unknown.METHODS:
We performed qualitative thematic analysis of transcripts from semi-structured interviews of anesthesiologists (8), surgeons (10), and geriatricians (9) who care for high-risk surgical patients at two academic medical centers in Boston, MA. The interview guide elicited clinicians' understanding of frailty, approach to decision-making regarding perioperative CPR, and perceptions of perioperative CPR in frail surgical patients.RESULTS:
We identified 5 themes perceptions of perioperative CPR in patients with frailty vary by provider specialty; judgments regarding appropriateness of CPR in surgical patients with frailty are typically multifactorial and include patient goals, age, comorbidities, and arrest etiology; resuscitation in patients with frailty is sometimes associated with moral distress; biases such as ableism and ageism may skew clinicians' perceptions of appropriateness of perioperative CPR in patients with frailty; and evidence to guide risk stratification for patients with frailty undergoing perioperative CPR is inadequate.CONCLUSIONS:
Anesthesiologists, surgeons, and geriatricians offer different accounts of frailty's relevance to judgments regarding CPR in surgical patients. Divergent views regarding frailty and perioperative CPR may impede efforts to deliver goal-concordant care and suggest a need for research to inform risk stratification, predict patient-centered outcomes, and understand the role of potential biases such as ageism and ableism.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Prognostic_studies
/
Qualitative_research
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Ann Surg
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Marrocos