Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decision-making in breast cancer screening: A qualitative exploration of the match between women's beliefs and screening information in the Netherlands.
Fransen, Mirjam P; Damman, Olga C; Bas, Sharell; Uiters, Ellen; Timmermans, Daniëlle Rm.
Afiliação
  • Fransen MP; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research ins
  • Damman OC; Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Bas S; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Uiters E; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
  • Timmermans DR; Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Patient Educ Couns ; 122: 108155, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325207
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Decision-making about breast cancer screening requires balanced and understandable information that takes prior beliefs of screening invitees into account.

METHODS:

In qualitative interviews with 22 Dutch women who were invited for screening for the first time (49-52 years of age, varying health literacy levels), we gained insight in their beliefs on breast cancer and breast cancer screening, and explored how the current screening information matched these beliefs.

RESULTS:

Breast cancer was perceived as an unpredictable, severe, and uncontrollable disease. Women considered screening as self-evident and an important mean to gain some control over breast cancer. Information on benefits of screening was in line with women's prior beliefs and confirmed women's main reasons to participate. Information about false-positive outcomes, overtreatment, and false negative outcomes did not correspond to women's prior beliefs and this information was generally not considered relevant for decision-making. Preferences for additional information merely concerned practical information on the screening procedure.

CONCLUSION:

Complex information on the harms of screening does not match women's beliefs and is not taken into account in their decision-making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Information regarding breast cancer screening could be further aligned to prior beliefs by taking into account values, filling knowledge gaps and correct misconceptions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Limite: Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article