Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is there a preferred platinum and fluoropyrimidine regimen for advanced HER2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma? Insights from 1293 patients in AGAMENON-SEOM registry.
Arias-Martinez, Aranzazu; Martínez de Castro, Eva; Gallego, Javier; Arrazubi, Virginia; Custodio, Ana; Fernández Montes, Ana; Diez, Marc; Hernandez, Raquel; Limón, María Luisa; Cano, Juana María; Vidal-Tocino, Rosario; Macias, Ismael; Visa, Laura; Martin Richard, Marta; Sauri, Tamara; Hierro, Cinta; Gil, Mireia; Cerda, Paula; Martínez Moreno, Elia; Martínez Lago, Nieves; Mérida-García, Antonio José; Gómez González, Lucía; García Navalón, Francisco Javier; Ruiz Martín, Maribel; Marín, Gema; López-López, Flora; Ruperez Blanco, Ana Belen; Fernández, Alejandro Francisco; Jimenez-Fonseca, Paula; Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto; Alvarez-Manceñido, Felipe.
Afiliação
  • Arias-Martinez A; Doctoral Program in Pharmacy, Universidad de Granada, Barrio Verxeles n°13 2°, CP 27850, Granada, Viveiro, Spain. arantxa.91.am@gmail.com.
  • Martínez de Castro E; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
  • Gallego J; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain.
  • Arrazubi V; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Custodio A; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC, CB16/12/00398, Madrid, Spain.
  • Fernández Montes A; Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Orense, Orense, Spain.
  • Diez M; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, VHIO, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Hernandez R; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain.
  • Limón ML; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
  • Cano JM; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain.
  • Vidal-Tocino R; Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca - IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.
  • Macias I; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain.
  • Visa L; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario El Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Martin Richard M; Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Catalán de Oncología (ICO), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Sauri T; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Hierro C; Medical Oncology Department, Instituto Catalán de Oncología (ICO)-Badalona, Barcelona; Badalona-Applied Research Group in Oncology (B-ARGO), Badalona, Spain.
  • Gil M; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia-Ciberonc CB16/12/0035, Valencia, Spain.
  • Cerda P; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu y Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Martínez Moreno E; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
  • Martínez Lago N; Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, Spain.
  • Mérida-García AJ; Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial de Zamora, Zamora, Spain.
  • Gómez González L; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
  • García Navalón FJ; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Son Llatzer, Mallorca, Spain.
  • Ruiz Martín M; Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia, Palencia, Spain.
  • Marín G; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
  • López-López F; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario del Sureste, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ruperez Blanco AB; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
  • Fernández AF; Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain.
  • Jimenez-Fonseca P; Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Oviedo, Spain.
  • Carmona-Bayonas A; Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, University of Murcia, IMIB, Murcia, Spain.
  • Alvarez-Manceñido F; Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 26(7): 1674-1686, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38361134
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The optimal chemotherapy backbone for HER2-negative advanced esophagogastric cancer, either in combination with targeted therapies or as a comparator in clinical trials, is uncertain. The subtle yet crucial differences in platinum-based regimens' safety and synergy with combination treatments need consideration.

METHODS:

We analyzed cases from the AGAMENON-SEOM Spanish registry of HER2-negative advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with platinum and fluoropyrimidine from 2008 to 2021. This study focused exclusively on patients receiving one of the four regimens FOLFOX (5-FU and oxaliplatin), CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin), CP (capecitabine and cisplatin) and FP (5-FU and cisplatin). The aim was to determine the most effective and tolerable platinum and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen and to identify any prognostic factors.

RESULTS:

Among 1293 patients, 36% received either FOLFOX (n = 468) or CAPOX (n = 466), 20% CP (n = 252), and 8% FP (n = 107). FOLFOX significantly increased PFS (progression free survival) compared to CP, with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.92, p = 0.009). The duration of treatment was similar across all groups. Survival outcomes among regimens were similar, but analysis revealed worse ECOG-PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status), > 2 metastatic sites, bone metastases, hypoalbuminemia, higher NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), and CP regimen as predictors of poor PFS. Fatigue was common in all treatments, with the highest incidence in FOLFOX (77%), followed by FP (72%), CAPOX (68%), and CP (60%). Other notable toxicities included neuropathy (FOLFOX 69%, CAPOX 62%), neutropenia (FOLFOX 52%, FP 55%), hand-foot syndrome in CP (46%), and thromboembolic events (FP 12%, CP 11%).

CONCLUSIONS:

FOLFOX shown better PFS than CP. Adverse effects varied neuropathy was more common with oxaliplatin, while thromboembolism was more frequent with cisplatin.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Sistema de Registros / Leucovorina / Cisplatino / Receptor ErbB-2 / Capecitabina / Fluoruracila Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged80 País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Sistema de Registros / Leucovorina / Cisplatino / Receptor ErbB-2 / Capecitabina / Fluoruracila Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged80 País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transl Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha