Is there a preferred platinum and fluoropyrimidine regimen for advanced HER2-negative esophagogastric adenocarcinoma? Insights from 1293 patients in AGAMENON-SEOM registry.
Clin Transl Oncol
; 26(7): 1674-1686, 2024 Jul.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38361134
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
The optimal chemotherapy backbone for HER2-negative advanced esophagogastric cancer, either in combination with targeted therapies or as a comparator in clinical trials, is uncertain. The subtle yet crucial differences in platinum-based regimens' safety and synergy with combination treatments need consideration.METHODS:
We analyzed cases from the AGAMENON-SEOM Spanish registry of HER2-negative advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with platinum and fluoropyrimidine from 2008 to 2021. This study focused exclusively on patients receiving one of the four regimens FOLFOX (5-FU and oxaliplatin), CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin), CP (capecitabine and cisplatin) and FP (5-FU and cisplatin). The aim was to determine the most effective and tolerable platinum and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen and to identify any prognostic factors.RESULTS:
Among 1293 patients, 36% received either FOLFOX (n = 468) or CAPOX (n = 466), 20% CP (n = 252), and 8% FP (n = 107). FOLFOX significantly increased PFS (progression free survival) compared to CP, with a hazard ratio of 0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.92, p = 0.009). The duration of treatment was similar across all groups. Survival outcomes among regimens were similar, but analysis revealed worse ECOG-PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status), > 2 metastatic sites, bone metastases, hypoalbuminemia, higher NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), and CP regimen as predictors of poor PFS. Fatigue was common in all treatments, with the highest incidence in FOLFOX (77%), followed by FP (72%), CAPOX (68%), and CP (60%). Other notable toxicities included neuropathy (FOLFOX 69%, CAPOX 62%), neutropenia (FOLFOX 52%, FP 55%), hand-foot syndrome in CP (46%), and thromboembolic events (FP 12%, CP 11%).CONCLUSIONS:
FOLFOX shown better PFS than CP. Adverse effects varied neuropathy was more common with oxaliplatin, while thromboembolism was more frequent with cisplatin.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Neoplasias Gástricas
/
Neoplasias Esofágicas
/
Adenocarcinoma
/
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica
/
Sistema de Registros
/
Leucovorina
/
Cisplatino
/
Receptor ErbB-2
/
Capecitabina
/
Fluoruracila
Tipo de estudo:
Prognostic_studies
Limite:
Aged80
País/Região como assunto:
Europa
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Clin Transl Oncol
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Espanha