Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of the psychometric properties of physical performance tests for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.
Exter, Sabien H; Koenders, Niek; Wees, Philip; Berg, Manon G A.
Afiliação
  • Exter SH; Department of Gastro-enterology and Hepatology, Dietetics and Intestinal Failure, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Koenders N; Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Wees P; IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Berg MGA; Department of Gastro-enterology and Hepatology, Dietetics and Intestinal Failure, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Age Ageing ; 53(6)2024 06 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851214
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This review provides an overview of the psychometric properties of the short physical performance battery (SPPB), timed up and go test (TUG), 4 m gait speed test (4 m GST) and the 400 m walk test (400 m WT) in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS:

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE, resulting in the inclusion of 50 studies with data from in total 19,266 participants (mean age 63.2-84.3). Data were extracted and properties were given a sufficient or insufficient overall rating following the COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of evidence (QoE) was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS:

The SPPB was evaluated in 12 studies, TUG in 30, 4 m GST in 12 and 400 m WT in 2. Reliability of the SPPB, TUG and 4 m GST was rated sufficient (moderate to good QoE). The measurement error of the SPPB was rated insufficient (low QoE). Criterion validity for the SPPB was insufficient in indicating sarcopenia (moderate QoE), while the TUG was sufficient and insufficient for determining mobility limitations (low QoE) and activities of daily living disability (low QoE), respectively. Construct validity of the SPPB, TUG, 4 m GST and 400 m WT was rated insufficient in many constructs (moderate to high QoE). Responsiveness was rated as insufficient for SPPB (high QoE) and TUG (very low QoE), while 4 m GST was rated as sufficient (high QoE).

CONCLUSION:

Overall, the psychometric quality of commonly used physical performance tests in community-dwelling older adults was generally rated insufficient, except for reliability. These tests are widely used in daily practice and recommended in guidelines; however, users should be cautious when drawing conclusions such as sarcopenia severity and change in physical performance due to limited psychometric quality of the recommended measurement instruments. There is a need for a disease-specific physical performance test for people with sarcopenia.This research received no specific grant from any funding agency and was registered a priori using the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022359725).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicometria / Avaliação Geriátrica / Sarcopenia / Vida Independente / Desempenho Físico Funcional Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Age Ageing Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Psicometria / Avaliação Geriátrica / Sarcopenia / Vida Independente / Desempenho Físico Funcional Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Age Ageing Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda