Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and Radiographic Status and PISF Levels of PGE2 Around Cement and Screw Retained Implants.
Aljudaibi, Suha Mohammed; Aseri, Abdulrahman Ahmed; Alqhtani, Mohammad Abdullah Zayed; Aldowah, Omir; Alhendi, Khalid Dhafer S; Almeshari, Ahmed A.
Afiliação
  • Aljudaibi SM; Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
  • Aseri AA; Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: aaaseri@nu.edu.sa.
  • Alqhtani MAZ; Prosthetic Dental Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
  • Aldowah O; Prosthetic Dental Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alhendi KDS; Prosthetic Dental Science Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
  • Almeshari AA; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Int Dent J ; 2024 Jun 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38866672
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim was to assess the peri-implant clinicoradiographic status and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) samples collected from individuals with cement-retained and crew-retained implants.

METHODS:

In this observational study, participants with cement-retained and screw-retained implants were enrolled. A questionnaire was utilized to gather demographic information and assess the educational background of the participants. Peri-implant modified plaque and bleeding indices, probing depth, and crestal bone loss were measured. Subsequently, PISF samples were collected, and corresponding volumes were recorded. Commercial kits employing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were employed to quantify PGE2 levels. The sample size was determined, and group comparisons were conducted using the Student t test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. Logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the correlation between PGE2 levels and clinicoradiographic and demographics. The predefined level of significance was established at P < .05.

RESULTS:

Sixty-seven participants, consisting of 33 with cement-retained implants and 34 with screw-retained implants, were included in the study. The mean ages for individuals with cement and screw-retained implants were 54.2 ± 8.7 and 58.7 ± 7.4 years, respectively. The majority of participants had completed university-level education. Reportedly, 87.9% and 82.4% of individuals with cement and screw-retained implants, respectively brushed teeth twice daily. No significant differences were observed in clinicoradiographic parameters, PGE2 volume, and levels between cement-retained and screw-retained implants. There was no correlation between PGE2 levels and peri-implant clinicoradiographic parameters among individuals with either cement-retained or screw-retained implants.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cement-retained and screw-retained implants exhibit a consistent peri-implant clinicoradiographic status, accompanied by stable levels of PGE2 in PISF provided oral hygiene maintenance regimens are stringently followed.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int Dent J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Arábia Saudita

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int Dent J Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Arábia Saudita