Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of totally robotic and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
Zheng, Yi-Ming; Luo, Zi-Yan; Li, Zheng-Yan; Liu, Jia-Jia; Ren, Zhi-Xiang; Wang, Jun-Jie; Yu, Pei-Wu; Shi, Yan; Zhao, Yong-Liang; Qian, Feng.
Afiliação
  • Zheng YM; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • Luo ZY; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • Li ZY; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China. lizhengyan01@sina.com.
  • Liu JJ; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • Ren ZX; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • Wang JJ; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • Yu PW; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • Shi Y; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • Zhao YL; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • Qian F; Department of General Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Gastrointestinal Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 30 Gao Tan Yan Road, Chongqing, 400038, China. 506038746@qq.com.
Surg Endosc ; 38(8): 4476-4484, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902410
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

With the improvements in laparoscopic or robotic surgical techniques and instruments, a growing number of surgeons have attempted to complete all digestive tract reconstruction intracorporeally; these procedures include totally robotic gastrectomy (TRG) and totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the TRG and compare the short-term outcomes of the TRG and TLG in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS:

Between January 2018 and June 2023, 346 consecutive patients who underwent TRG or TLG at a high-volume academic gastric cancer specialty center were included. 11 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce confounding bias. The surgical outcomes, postoperative morbidity, and surgical burden were compared in PSM cohort.

RESULTS:

After PSM, a well-balanced cohort of 194 patients (97 in each group) was included in the analysis. The total operation time of the TRG group was significantly longer than that of the TLG group (244.9 vs. 213.0 min, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the effective operation time between the 2 groups (217.8 vs. 207.2 min, P = 0.059). The digestive tract reconstruction time of the TRG group was significantly shorter than that of the TLG group (39.4 vs. 46.7 min, P < 0.001). The mean blood loss in the TRG group was less than that in the TLG group (101.1 vs. 126.8 mL, P = 0.014). The TRG group had more retrieved lymph nodes in the suprapancreatic area than that in the TLG group (16.6 vs 14.2, P = 0.002). The TRG group had a lower surgery task load index (38.9 vs. 43.1, P < 0.001) than the TLG group. No significant difference was found in terms of postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups (14.4% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.691).

CONCLUSION:

This study demonstrated that TRG is a safe and feasible procedure, and is preferable to TLG in terms of invasion and ergonomics. The TRG may maximize the superiority of robotic surgical systems and embodies the theory of minimally invasive surgery.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Laparoscopia / Pontuação de Propensão / Duração da Cirurgia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Gastrectomia Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Laparoscopia / Pontuação de Propensão / Duração da Cirurgia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos / Gastrectomia Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China