Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cognitive Behavioral Program for the Prevention of Depression in At-Risk Adolescents: Isolating the Effects of Dose.
Dickerson, John F; Clarke, Greg; Weersing, V Robin; Lynch, Frances L; Hollon, Steven D; Brent, David; Beardslee, William; Gladstone, Tracy R G; Porta, Giovanna; DeBar, Lynn; Brooks, Neon; Garber, Judy.
Afiliação
  • Dickerson JF; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research.
  • Clarke G; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research.
  • Weersing VR; Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University and University of California, San Diego.
  • Lynch FL; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research.
  • Hollon SD; Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University.
  • Brent D; Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
  • Beardslee W; Department of Psychiatry, Children's Hospital Boston and Judge Baker Children's Center.
  • Gladstone TRG; Wellesley Centers for Women, Wellesley College.
  • Porta G; Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
  • DeBar L; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research.
  • Brooks N; Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research.
  • Garber J; Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University.
Am J Epidemiol ; 2024 Jun 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904429
ABSTRACT
The current study estimated effects of intervention dose (attendance) of a cognitive behavioral prevention (CBP) program on depression-free days (DFD) in adolescent offspring of parents with a history of depression. As part of secondary analyses of a multi-site randomized controlled trial, we analyzed the complete intention-to-treat sample of 316 at-risk adolescents ages 13-17. Youth were randomly assigned to the CBP program plus usual care (n=159) or to usual care alone (n=157). The CBP program involved 8 weekly acute sessions and 6 monthly continuation sessions. Results showed that higher CBP program dose predicted more DFDs, with a key threshold of approximately 75% of a full dose in analyses employing instrumental variable methodology to control multiple channels of bias. Specifically, attending at more than 75% of acute phase sessions led to 45.3 more DFDs over the 9-month period post randomization, which accounted for over 12% of the total follow-up days. Instrument sets were informed by study variables and external data including weather and travel burden. In contrast, conventional analysis methods failed to find a significant dose-outcome relation. Application of the instrumental variable approach, which better controls the influence of confounding, demonstrated that higher CBP program dose resulted in more DFDs.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Epidemiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Epidemiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article