[Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve electrostimulation in urge urinary incontinence and faecal incontinence]. / Electroestimulación del nervio tibial posterior en incontinencia urinaria de urgencia e incontinencia fecal.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve electrostimulation (P-PTNS) in urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and faecal incontinence (FI) refractory to first-line treatment. A secondary aim was to identify predictors of treatment response. To do this, we performed a 2-year analytical, longitudinal and prospective study in patients with UUI and FI treated with P-PTNS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with UUI and FI who were treated with P-PTNS and who completed the bladder/faecal incontinence diary and severity and quality of life questionnaires. We excluded patients with neurogenic UUI and those who abandoned treatment or did not complete the questionnaires. We assessed demographic and clinical variables (micturition/defecation habits pre- and postreatment), severity scales before and after treatment (ICIQ-SF, Sandvick and Wexner), subjective improvement and quality of life (IQOL and FIQL pre- and postreatment). The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS v19. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 21 patients divided into 2 groups: -UUI group, 9 patients. After P-PTNS, there was a statistically significant improvement in diurnal (p=.018) and nocturnal (p=.016) urinary frequency, urgencies/day (p=.018), urine leakage/day (p=.027), ICIQ-SF and Sandvick (p=.018), and IQOL (p=.012). This improvement was related to exercise (p=.039) and prolapse (p=.05). -Group FI, 12 patients. After P-PTNS, there was a statistically significant improvement in defecation frequency (p=.027), incontinence (p=.012), Wexner scale (p=.007), and FIQL in its 4 dimensions (lifestyle, behaviour, embarrassment p=.005; and depression p=.008). This improvement was related to age (p=.048), time since onset (p=.044) and prolapse (p=.026). CONCLUSIONS: The P-PTNS is effective in UUI and FI refractory to conventional treatment. Treatment response is affected by several factors.

[Capsular hydrodilatation versus kinesitherapy as initial treatment of finger capsulitis]. / Hidrodilatación capsular versus cinesiterapia como tratamiento inicial en las capsulitis de dedos.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effectiveness of early capsular ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation (HD) of the proximal interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal joints in reducing joint stiffness and shortening kinesitherapy, as well as in improving hand functionality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a one-year quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study with a control group in patients with proximal interphalangeal or metacarpophalangeal capsulitis in complex regional pain syndrome stages 2 or 3. Inclusion criteria consisted of age over 18 years, visual analogue scale<4 points and the absence of prior treatment. The control group received only kinesitherapy and the experimental group received capsular HD before kinesitherapy. There were 10 patients per group. The main measures were range of motion, active grip, Spanish validated Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the number of kinesitherapy sessions required. RESULTS: At baseline, the range of motion of the proximal proximal interphalangeal joint was 20° worse in the experimental group (P=.01). There were no statistically significant differences in the other baseline characteristics. Immediate gain in range of motion after HD was 61.71% (P=.024). No significant improvements were observed in functionality except in active grip after 2 weeks of HD (P=.02) and one month later compared with the control group (P=.014). The number of kinesitherapy sessions required was 19.6±10.42 (95% CI) in the HD group and 29.4±8.11 (95% CI) in the control group (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Capsular HD could be considered as an initial treatment in finger joint stiffness because of the significant immediate improvement in range of motion. It is also an innovative technique in these joints with a short learning curve. The technique can be safely and effectively performed in a physiatry consulting room.