Signs of perceptual disorder during movement were reliably assessed in children with cerebral palsy in Sweden.

AIM: The aim of this Swedish study was to evaluate the assessment of clinical signs of perceptual disorder in children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Three experienced raters assessed 56 videos of 19 children from 1 to 18 years of age with bilateral spastic CP, which were recorded by colleagues at an Italian hospital. Six signs were evaluated for inter-rater reliability and criterion validity. Clinical applicability was evaluated by assessing inter-rater reliability between 47 Swedish clinicians, who examined 15 of the videos during face-to-face and online education seminars. There were 41 physiotherapists, two occupational therapists and four doctors, with 1-37 years of clinical experience and a median of 10 years. RESULTS: The experienced raters demonstrated moderate to almost perfect inter-rater reliability (kappa 0.54-0.81) and criterion validity (0.54-0.87) for startle reaction, upper limbs in startle position, averted eye gaze and eye blinking. The clinicians recognised these signs with at least moderate reliability (0.56-0.88). Grimacing and posture freezing were less reliable (0.22-0.35) and valid (0.09-0.50). CONCLUSION: Four of the six signs of perceptual disorder were reliably recognised by experienced raters and by clinicians after education seminars. Extended education and larger study samples are needed to recognise all the signs.

Mobile Solutions for Clinical Surveillance and Evaluation in Infancy-General Movement Apps.

The Prechtl General Movements Assessment (GMA) has become a clinician and researcher toolbox for evaluating neurodevelopment in early infancy. Given that it involves the observation of infant movements from video recordings, utilising smartphone applications to obtain these recordings seems like the natural progression for the field. In this review, we look back on the development of apps for acquiring general movement videos, describe the application and research studies of available apps, and discuss future directions of mobile solutions and their usability in research and clinical practice. We emphasise the importance of understanding the background that has led to these developments while introducing new technologies, including the barriers and facilitators along the pathway. The GMApp and Baby Moves apps were the first ones developed to increase accessibility of the GMA, with two further apps, NeuroMotion and InMotion, designed since. The Baby Moves app has been applied most frequently. For the mobile future of GMA, we advocate collaboration to boost the field's progression and to reduce research waste. We propose future collaborative solutions, including standardisation of cross-site data collection, adaptation to local context and privacy laws, employment of user feedback, and sustainable IT structures enabling continuous software updating.

Changes in prevalence of non-optimal neurological condition between 6.5 and 12 years in children born extremely preterm.

AIM: To assess prevalence of non-optimal neurological condition and associations with motor function in children born extremely preterm (EPT) up to early adolescence, and to examine potential changes in neurological condition between 6.5 and 12 years. METHOD: A prospective cohort of one hundred six children (EPT n = 62, term n = 44) was assessed at 6.5 and 12 years. Four domains derived from the Touwen Neurological Examination (coordination and balance, posture and muscle tone, reflexes, and nerve function of the eyes and face) were used to assess the presence of a non-optimal neurological condition (defined as the presence of any abnormal domain). The Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2nd ed. was used to evaluate motor function. RESULTS: Twenty-seven children born EPT (44%) were assessed as having a non-optimal neurological condition compared with 4 (9%) in the control group (p=<0.001) at 12 years. Between age 6.5 and 12 years the number of children born EPT with a non-optimal neurological condition decreased from 37 to 27 (p = 0.007). At 12 years these children also had significantly lower MABC-2 total test scores, compared to those with normal neurology: median (range) 57 (32-79) versus 75 (43-99), respectively (p=<0.001). The same was shown for subscale scores; manual dexterity (p=<0.001), aiming/catching (p = 0.004), and balance (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of a non-optimal neurological condition reduced with increasing age. However, still, at 12 years, these neurological impairments remained significantly more common in the EPT group than in their term-born peers and was shown to be related to a reduced motor function.

Reliability of the Motor Optimality Score-Revised: A study of infants at elevated likelihood for adverse neurological outcomes.

AIM: To assess the inter-assessor reliability of the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) when used in infants at elevated likelihood for adverse neurological outcome. METHODS: MOS-R were assessed in three groups of infants by two assessors/cohort. Infants were recruited from longitudinal projects in Sweden (infants born extremely preterm), India (infants born in low-resource communities) and the USA (infants prenatally exposed to SARS-CoV-2). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and kappa (κw) were applied. ICC of MOS-R subcategories and total scores were presented for cohorts together and separately and for age-spans: 9-12, 13-16 and 17-25-weeks post-term age. RESULTS: 252 infants were included (born extremely preterm n = 97, born in low-resource communities n = 97, prenatally SARS-CoV-2 exposed n = 58). Reliability of the total MOS-R was almost perfect (ICC: 0.98-0.99) for all cohorts, together and separately. Similar result was found for age-spans (ICC: 0.98-0.99). Substantial to perfect reliability was shown for the MOS-R subcategories (κw: 0.67-1.00), with postural patterns showing the lowest value 0.67. CONCLUSION: The MOS-R can be used in high-risk populations with substantial to perfect reliability, both in regards of total/subcategory scores as well as in different age groups. However, the subcategory postural patterns as well as the clinical applicability of the MOS-R needs further study.

Early prediction of neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12 years in children born extremely preterm.

BACKGROUND: Extremely preterm (EPT) birth is a major risk factor for neurodevelopmental impairments. The aim was to evaluate the predictive value of Prechtl General Movement Assessment (GMA), including the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R), at 3 months corrected age (CA) for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of 12 years. METHODS: The GMA, including the MOS-R, was applied at 3 months CA and outcomes were assessed at 12 years by Touwen's neurological examination, the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2, and chart reviews. RESULTS: Fifty-three infants born EPT (33 boys, mean GA 25 weeks, mean body weight 805 ± 156 g) were included. Forty-two (79%) children participated in the follow-up (mean age 12.3 ± 0.4) and 62% of these had adverse outcomes. The MOS-R differed between groups (p = 0.007). The respective predictive values of GMA, aberrant FMs, and the MOS-R cut-off of 21 for adverse outcomes were positive predictive values (PPVs) of 1.00 and 0.77, negative predictive value of 0.47 and 0.63, sensitivity of 0.31 and 0.77, and specificity of 1.00 and 0.77. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Prechtl GMA, including the MOS-R, at 3 months CA predicted an overall adverse neurodevelopment at 12 years, with a high PPV, specificity, and sensitivity in children born EPT. IMPACT: The Prechtl GMA, including the MOS-R, can improve early identification of long-term adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. This is the first study to investigate the predictive value of the MOS-R for neurodevelopmental outcome at mid-school age in children born EPT. Using the GMA, including the MOS-R, is suggested as one important part of the neurological assessment at 3 months CA in children born EPT. Aberrant FMs in combination with a MOS of <21 is an indicator of an increased risk of future adverse neurodevelopment in children born EPT.

Discrete white matter abnormalities at age 8-11 years in children born extremely preterm are not associated with adverse cognitive or motor outcomes.

AIM: Little is known about the prevalence of discrete white matter abnormalities (WMA) beyond the first years in children born extremely preterm (EPT) and the relation to neurodevelopmental outcomes. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of discrete WMA in children born EPT and the relationship to neonatal white matter injuries (WMI), white matter (WM) volume, WM diffusivity and neurodevelopment. METHODS: The study was a part of a longitudinal follow-up study of EPT neonates. All children were scanned at Karolinska University hospital 2004-2007 (neonates) and 2014-2015 (children at 8-11 years). WMA was qualitatively assessed by visual inspection. Developmental assessment was conducted at 12 years. RESULTS: In total, 112 children (median age 10.3 years, 56 girls) underwent MRI of the brain (68 EPT, 45 controls). In the EPT group, a subset had MRI around term equivalent age (n = 61). In the EPT group, the prevalence of discrete WMA at 8-11 years was 52%. There was a positive association between WMI at TEA and 8-11 years. There was no association between WMI and WM volumes or diffusivity at 8-11 years. Discrete WMA was not related to neurodevelopmental outcomes. CONCLUSION: Discrete WMA was prevalent in children born EPT at 8-11 years but were not related to neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Usability and inter-rater reliability of the NeuroMotion app: A tool in General Movements Assessments.

BACKGROUND: Early intervention after perinatal brain insults requires early detection of infants with cerebral palsy (CP). General Movements Assessments (GMA) in the fidgety movement period has a high predictive value for CP. AIM: To investigate the NeuroMotion™ app's usability regarding film quality and user experience and to assess the inter-rater reliability of GMA in a neonatal risk group. METHODS: GMA, inter-rater reliability and film quality was assessed in a cohort consisting of 37 infants enrolled in a multicentre study of GMA as part of the Swedish neonatal follow-up program for high-risk infants. Some of these infants were filmed twice. For evaluation of user experience 95 parents of 52 infants were addressed with a web-based questionnaire. A GMA expert assessed film quality and performed GMA and three on-site assessors, individually performed GMA. Inter-rater reliability was computed using Krippendorff's alpha (k-alpha). RESULTS: In all, 45 films showed good or excellent quality. The response rate of the questionnaire survey was 40% and revealed predominantly positive perceptions of the NeuroMotion™ app. GMA in 36 infants resulted in substantial agreement (k-alpha = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.3-1.0) between the three on-site assessors' consensus and the GMA expert. Inter-rater reliability for GMA between the on-site assessors was moderate (k-alpha = 0.48, 0.18-0.74). CONCLUSION: The NeuroMotion™ app produces good technical quality films and the app user experience was overall positive. High agreement was observed between the on-site assessors and the GMA expert. The study design is feasible for more extensive GMA studies in cohorts of infants at risk of CP.

Movements and posture in infants born extremely preterm in comparison to term-born controls.

BACKGROUND: Identifying altered motor development at an early stage is crucial for infants born extremely preterm (EPT), as they face a high risk of long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. The Prechtl General Movement Assessment (GMA), including the Motor Optimality Score Revised (MOS-R), can provide important insights into these infants' later neurodevelopmental function. AIMS: To compare age-specific movements and postures in infants born EPT compared to term-born controls at three months corrected age. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study design. SUBJECTS: 53 infants born EPT (mean gestational age 25 weeks; 23-26) were included and matched for gender and recording age with 53 term-born controls (mean gestational age 40 weeks, 37-41). OUTCOME MEASURES: GMA including the MOS-R at three months corrected age (re-analysis of video-recordings). RESULTS: Of the infants born EPT, 19% showed aberrant fidgety movements (FMs); all term-born infants had normal FMs. There was a significant difference in MOS-R (p≤0.001) between controls (median = 26, IQR 26-28) and EPT infants (median = 18, IQR 17-21), as well as in all subcategories of the MOS-R. The EPT group had a significantly higher number of infants showing atypical movement and postural patterns as well as a reduced repertoire for the age compared to the controls. All infants born EPT moved monotonously and jerky. P-values were all <0.001. CONCLUSION: Infants born EPT have an altered early motor development. The MOS-R may contribute to further understanding of motor performance in this group of children since it can detect neurological- and motor alterations at a very early age.

Psychometric properties of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Children (KOOS-Child) in children with knee disorders.

BACKGROUND: The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a self-administered valid and reliable questionnaire for adults with joint injury or degenerative disease. Recent data indicate a lack of comprehensibility when this is used with children. Thus, a preliminary KOOS-Child was developed. This study aims to evaluate psychometric properties of the final KOOS-Child when used in children with knee disorders. METHODS: 115 children (boys/girls 51/64, 7-16 years) with knee disorders were recruited. All children (n=115) completed the KOOS-Child, the Child-Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the EQ-5D-Youth version (EQ-5D-Y) at baseline to evaluate construct validity. Two additional administrations (1-3 weeks and 3 months) were performed for analyses of reliability (internal consistency and test-retest; n=72) and responsiveness (n=91). An anchor-based approach was used to evaluate responsiveness and interpretability. RESULTS: After item reduction, the final KOOS-Child consists of 39 items divided into five subscales. No floor or ceiling effects (≤15%) were found. An exploratory factor analysis on subscale level demonstrated that items in all subscales except for Symptoms loaded on one factor (Eigenvalues 3.1-5.5, Symptom: 2 factors, Eigenvalue >1). Sufficient homogeneity was found for all subscales (Cronbach's α = 0.80-0.90) except for the Symptoms subscale (α = 0.59). Test-retest reliability was substantial to excellent for all subscales (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 0.78-0.91, Smallest Detectable Change (SDC)ind 14.6-22.6, SDCgroup 1.7-2.7). Construct validity was confirmed, and greater effect sizes were seen in those reporting improved clinical status. Minimal important changes greater than the SDCs were found for patients reporting to be better and much better. CONCLUSIONS: The final KOOS-Child demonstrates good psychometric properties and supports the use of the KOOS-Child when evaluating children with knee disorders.

Development of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for children (KOOS-Child): comprehensibility and content validity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is distinguished from other knee-specific measures by the inclusion of separate scales for evaluation of activities of daily living, sports and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life, with presentation of separate subscale scores as a profile. However, its applicability in children has not been established. In this study, we examined how well the KOOS could be understood in a cohort of children with knee injury, with a view to preparing a pediatric version (KOOS-Child). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A trained researcher conducted cognitive interviews with 34 Swedish children who had symptomatic knee injuries (either primary or repeated). They were 10-16 years of age, and were selected to allow for equal group representation of age and sex. All the interviews were recorded. 4 researchers analyzed the data and modified the original KOOS questionnaire. RESULTS: Many children (n =14) had difficulty in tracking items based on the time frame and an equivalent number of children had trouble in understanding several terms. Mapping errors resulted from misinterpretation of items and from design issues related to the item such as double-barreled format. Most children understood how to use the 5-point Likert response scale. Many children found the instructions confusing from both a lexical and a formatting point of view. Overall, most children found that several items were irrelevant. INTERPRETATION: The original KOOS is not well understood by children. Modifications related to comprehension, mapping of responses, and jargon in the KOOS were made based on qualitative feedback from the children.

Reliability and reference values of two clinical measurements of dynamic and static knee position in healthy children.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate reliability of the Single-limb mini squat test (a dynamic measure of medio-lateral knee position) and the Quadriceps-angle (Q-angle) (a static measure of medio-lateral knee position), present paediatric reference values of the Q-angle, and evaluate the association between the tests. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-six healthy children (9-16 years) were included (intra/inter-rater reliability for Q-angle (n = 37/85) and for Single-limb mini squat test (n = 33/28)). Dynamic medio-lateral knee position was assessed by the Single-limb mini squat test. Static medio-lateral knee position was evaluated by the Q-angle. RESULTS: The reliability of the Single-limb mini squat test was found to be moderate (kappa 0.48-0.57, 95% CI 0.16-0.85, 76-79% agreement). Fair to moderate reliability (ICC 0.35-0.42, 95% CI 0.11-0.66, SEM 1.4°-1.9°, n.s.) of the Q-angle measurements was found. Reference values for the Q-angle (mean 13.5° (1.9)-15.3° (2.8)) varies with age and gender. No associations were found between dynamic and static measures. CONCLUSIONS: The Single-limb mini squat test showed a moderate reliability and the Q-angle showed a fair to moderate reliability. A difference found for age and gender was lower than 5° and may not be clinical significant. No association were found between the two tests, indicating dynamic and static knee position being two different concepts. In a clinical perspective, we suggest that the Single-limb mini squat test is a contribution to the available tool box for evaluation of dynamic medio-lateral knee position in children, although the Q-angle may not be used before more research has been done justifying its use.

Reliability of a new instrument for measuring plantarflexor muscle strength.

OBJECTIVES: To test the reliability of a new muscle strength testing instrument (the Strength Measuring Chair [SMC]) designed to quantify isometric strength in the lower extremities, and to determine the agreement between the SMC and an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex). DESIGN: Isometric strength tests were performed in plantarflexors with 2 different knee positions (60 degrees, 30 degrees). Measurements were taken at 3 different sessions. SETTING: Strength testing laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three able-bodied adults and 15 able-bodied children. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Isometric plantarflexor strength. RESULTS: The reliability of isometric strength measurements of plantarflexors taken in the SMC was excellent for both the adult and children groups (intraclass correlation coefficient range, .84-.87). A Bland-Altman 95% limit of agreement test showed no systematic variation in 3 of the 4 SMC test observations; systematic variation was only observed in the adult group at a knee position of 30 degrees. There was no systematic difference in the adult group between the SMC and the isokinetic dynamometer, but there was a systematic variation in the children's group. CONCLUSIONS: The SMC reliably measured isometric plantarflexor strength in the tested populations.

Trunk and center of mass movements during gait in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Motion of the body center of mass (CoM) can often indicate the overall effect of the strategy of forward progression used. In the present study, focus is placed on trunk movements in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse/rotation plane, as well as placement of the CoM, during gait in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Seventeen children with JIA, all with polyarticular lower extremity involvement were examined before and approximately two weeks after treatment with intra-articular cortico-steroid injections. Movement was recorded with a 6-camera 3D motion analysis system in both the children with JIA and in 21 healthy controls. Trunk and center of mass movements were compared between JIA and controls, and effects of intra-articular cortico-steroid treatment were evaluated. Children with JIA were more posteriorly tilted in the trunk, contrary to the common clinical impression, and had their CoM placed more posterior and off-centred, which may have been a result of pain. With such knowledge, it might be possible to better understand the effects of their pain and involvement, and ultimately to plan a treatment strategy for improving their gait patterns.