Comparison of lithotripsy methods during mini-PNL: is there a role for ballistic lithotripsy in the era of high-power lasers.

BACKGROUND: For renal stones > 20 mm, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) offers the best stone clearance rates with acceptable complication rates. This study aimed to compare the efficiency of high-power holmium YAG laser and ballistic lithotripsy during mini-PNL. METHODS: Data from 880 patients who underwent mini-PNL for renal stones was investigated retrospectively. The study utilized propensity score matching to create two groups: laser lithotripsy (n = 440) and ballistic lithotripsy (n = 440). The groups were matched based on stone size, Guy's stone score, and stone density. The main objectives of the study were to assess the stone-free rate (SFR), duration of surgery, and complication rates. RESULTS: The average age of the population was 51.4 ± 7.1 years, with a mean stone size of 28.6 ± 8.3 mm and a mean stone density of 1205 ± 159 HU. There were no significant differences between the groups. The SFRs of the laser lithotripsy and ballistic lithotripsy were 92.5% and 90.2%, respectively (p = 0.23). The laser lithotripsy group had a notably shorter surgery time (40.1 ± 6.3 min) compared to the ballistic lithotripsy group (55.6 ± 9.9 min) (p = 0.03). Complication rates were similar (p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a high-power holmium YAG laser provides quicker operation time compared to ballistic lithotripsy. However, ballistic lithotripsy is still an effective and safe option for stone fragmentation during mini-PNL. In places where a high-power holmium YAG laser is not available, ballistic lithotripters are still a safe, effective, and affordable option for mini-PNL.

Investigation of Atypical Cell Parameter in the Surveillance of Patients with NMIBC; Initial Outcomes of a Single Center Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how well the Sysmex automated urine-analyzer's atypical-cell parameter can predict oncological outcomes when compared to cytology and pathology data in the follow-up of NMIBC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively collected clinical data from 273 patients who underwent cystoscopic examination due to benign and malign reasons in our center between June 2020 and March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups. (Group-1: Patients with no previous diagnosis of bladder cancer(BC), Group-2: Patients with previously diagnosed NMIBC). The a typical-cell parameter was determined by studying the urine sample given by the patient for urinalysis. The atypical-cell parameter's sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 76(41.1%) patients underwent diagnostic procedures (Group-1) and remaining 109(58.9%) patients were NMIBC patients (Group-2) who subjected to control cystoscopy on follow-up. BC was detected in 70 patients, 28 of whom were newly diagnosed (Group-1). Remaining 42 patients had recurrence during their follow-up (Group-2). Atypical cell values of 70 patients with BC were determined to be statistically significantly higher than those without malignancy. In Group-2, median atypical-cell values for those with no malignancy, those with low-grade BC reccurrence, and those with high-grade BC recurrence were 0.00(IQR:0.00-0.80), 0.25(IQR:0.10℃1.10) and 1.20(IQR:0.70-2.15), respectively (p<0.001). For a cut-off of 0.1 atypical cells/µL, sensitivity and specificity were measured as 83.33% and 53.73%, respectivel (AUC:0.727;p-value<0.001). CONCLUSION: Atypical-cell parameter of the Sysmex-UF-5000 automated urine-analyzer is a newly introduced research parameter. The results of this study are promising. Based on our results, we presume that the atypical-cell parameter may be used in surveillance of the NMIBC patients. Multi-center studies with larger patient populations are required to prove its efficacy.

Perioperative adverse events and functional outcomes following open and robot-assisted prostatectomy in patients over age 70.

AIM: To evaluate the safety (perioperative adverse events) of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and functional outcomes (continence and erectile dysfunction) of open and robotic radical prostatectomy in elderly patients. METHODS: The data of patients (≥70 years old) who underwent open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORRP) and RARP within the period from November 2014 to February 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. The perioperative adverse events and the functional outcomes of both surgical approaches were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 149 men (59.3%) underwent ORRP, and 102 men (41.7%) underwent RARP. The mean age in the ORRP group was 73.6 ± 3.2 years, and that in the RARP group was 74.7 ± 4.1 years. The rate of grade 3 or higher (major) complications for the ORRP group was 4.7% (7 out of 149), and that for the RARP group was 4.9% (5 out of 102). The 24 months full continence and potency rates of the ORRP and RARP groups were 78.5% vs 79.4% and 21.8% vs 22.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The perioperative adverse events are similar in elderly patients undergoing ORRP and in RARP. The continence rates are favourable and reasonable, although the potency rates are low in elderly men who underwent prostatectomy. The results of the present study may be useful for surgeons in their decision making and counselling of elderly patients.

Individual-risk-score for urinary tract malignancy in patients with microscopic hematuria.

AIM: To determine the patients who can be safely exempted from undergoing unnecessary diagnostic procedures for microscopic hematuria (MH) evaluation by using the developed individual-risk-scoring system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients who underwent a complete urological evaluation for MH were identified retrospectively. The risk factors for urinary malignancy which defined in the 2020 American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction guidelines were recorded for each patient. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to establish a predictive risk-scoring system. The odds ratios obtained as a result of the logistic regression analysis were scored. RESULTS: A total of 1461 patients who had undergone a complete urological evaluation for MH were identified. The urinary malignancy rate was 3.4% (50 of the 1461 patients). According to the odds ratios, age >40 was calculated as 1 point; male gender, 2 points; smoking history, 4 points; presence of occupational risk factor, 1 point; and presence of macroscopic hematuria, 2 points. For the cut-off risk score, 5 points was found to be the most appropriate score according to the sensitivity and specificity levels. The patients with risk scores of 5 points or lower were considered to be in the low-risk group for urinary tract malignancy. CONCLUSION: The patients with a risk score of 5 points or above require complete urological evaluation. The results of the present study may reduce the number of patients undergoing unnecessary urological evaluation.