Deep endometriosis: Can surgical complexity and associated risk factors be evaluated with transvaginal sonography and classification systems?

Deep endometriosis (DE) surgery often requires advanced knowledge in laparoscopic surgery due to the location of affected organs such as the bowel, vagina, rectovaginal space including adjacent nerve structures, ureters and urinary bladder. Patients are at risk of serious complications and sequelae like anastomotic leakage, rectovaginal fistula and voiding dysfunction. Detailed knowledge of disease extent and location by transvaginal sonography (TVS) can aid the clinician to pre-operatively plan complex surgeries and estimate associated risks. Classification systems like #Enzian can be used in combination with TVS to assess surgical risk factors.

Transvaginal Sonographic Imaging and Associated Techniques for Diagnosis of Ovarian, Deep Endometriosis, and Adenomyosis: A Comprehensive Review.

Imaging of endometriosis and in particular deep endometriosis (DE) is crucial in the clinical management of women facing this debilitating condition. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is the first-line imaging method and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide supplemental information. However, the delay in diagnosis of up to 10 years and more is of concern. This problem might be overcome by simple steps using imaging with emphasis on TVS and referral to tertiary care. Finally, TVS is crucial in mapping extent and location of disease in planning surgical therapy and counseling women regarding various therapeutic options. This review presents the available data on imaging of endometriosis with a focus on TVS and MRI for DE, adenomyosis, and ovarian endometriomas including endometriomas in pregnancy as well as the use of "soft markers." The review presents an approach that is in accordance with the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group consensus statement.

Pain and fertility outcomes of nerve-sparing, full-thickness disk or segmental bowel resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis-A prospective cohort study.

INTODUCTION: Choosing the optimal treatment for bowel endometriosis, ie, conservative vs radical surgery, is under debate. We aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of segmental resection and disk resection regarding fertility, pain symptoms, and quality of life score of women with colorectal deep infiltrating endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From March 2011 to December 2016, 134 consecutive patients with symptomatic deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid up to 25 cm from the anal verge undergoing segmental resection or disk resection were prospectively evaluated regarding reduction in pain symptoms, fertility outcomes, and complication rates according to Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Of the 134 women included, segmental resection was performed in 102 (76.1%) women and disk resection was performed in 32 (23.9%) women. There was no difference in duration of surgery, complication rates, mean hospital stay, or discrepancy in hemoglobin level comparing the two groups. There was no significant difference regarding reduction of pain symptoms, fertility, and functional outcomes. One hundred and twelve (83.6%) women were followed up long-term. In both cohorts, there was a significant reported decrease in pain symptoms and increase in quality of life scores. Of all the 61 infertile women, 26 (42.6%) became pregnant spontaneously, and 13 (21.3%) by in vitro fertilization with an overall pregnancy rate of 63.4%. The overall complication rate (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) was 8 of 134 (5.9%) without statistically significant difference between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Both conservative surgery with disk resection, and nerve- and vessel-sparing segmental resection reduce pain symptoms with equal morbidity. Fertility is improved with surgery with both techniques.

Outcome of sonography-based minimally invasive surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the ureter and urinary bladder - a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal sonography for preoperative detection of bladder endometriosis and surgical outcomes regarding fertility and pain symptoms of women with urinary tract endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with urinary tract endometriosis undergoing laparoscopic partial cystectomy and/or ureterolysis/decompression, ureteric resection and end-to-end anastomosis or ureteroneocystostomy for ureteral stenosis and hydronephrosis. RESULTS: Of 207 patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis, 50 exhibited urinary tract endometriosis, comprising 30 patients with bladder endometriosis and 23 women with solitary or additional hydronephrosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, positive/negative likelihood ratios and test accuracy for transvaginal sonography detecting bladder endometriosis were 93%, 99%, 97%, 99%, 155.5, 0.07 and 98.6% respectively. All women with bladder endometriosis underwent partial cystectomy. In cases of hydronephrosis, 14 conservative ureterolysis/decompressions, six ureteral resection anastomoses and three ureteroneocystostomies were performed. Duration of surgery was 205 min (range 89-365 min), average blood loss was 1.6 g/dL (range 0.3-4.6 g/dL) and hospital stay on average 8 days (range 2-16 days). The conversion rate was 4%. We observed five grade III complications. After a median follow up of 23 months, there was a decrease in dysmenorrhea (7.6-1.6; p < 0.001), dyspareunia (3.0-0.9, p < 0.001) and dysuria (3.3-0.2; p < 0.003), and an increase in quality of life (3.3-8.1; p < 0.001). The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 46% and life birth rate 18%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for urinary tract endometriosis is effective for treatment of hydronephrosis, reduction of pain symptoms and may improve fertility. Transvaginal sonography is highly accurate for presurgical detection of bladder involvement.

Complications in operative hysteroscopy - is prevention possible?

Operative hysteroscopy in a hospital setting has revolutionized surgical treatment of benign uterine disorders. It is minimally invasive, cost- and time-effective, and may spare patients major surgical interventions. Operative hysteroscopy in a day-case hospital setting is regarded as a safe and well-tolerated procedure with low complication rates. However, prevention of adverse events is crucial in daily practice to optimize patient care. Complications in operative hysteroscopy can be divided into early complications, including bleeding, uterine perforation, infection and fluid overload, or late complications and suboptimal outcomes, such as incomplete resection and intrauterine adhesions. Awareness and knowledge of management of adverse events as well as the use of possible preventative measures will increase the quality and safety of hysteroscopic surgery. The present commentary focuses on these issues as an up-to-date basis for everyday clinical practice.