Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gene Ther ; 18(9): 929-35, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21472008

RESUMO

RNA interference (RNAi) has been successfully employed for specific inhibition of gene expression; however, safety and delivery of RNAi remain critical issues. We investigated the combinatorial use of RNAi and U1 interference (U1i). U1i is a gene-silencing technique that acts on the pre-mRNA by preventing polyadenylation. RNAi and U1i have distinct mechanisms of action in different cellular compartments and their combined effect allows usage of minimal doses, thereby avoiding toxicity while retaining high target inhibition. As a proof of concept, we investigated knockdown of the firefly luciferase reporter gene by combinatorial use of RNAi and U1i, and evaluated their inhibitory potential both in vitro and in vivo. Co-transfection of RNAi and U1i constructs showed additive reduction of luciferase expression up to 95% in vitro. We attained similar knockdown when RNAi and U1i constructs were hydrodynamically transfected into murine liver, demonstrating for the first time successful in vivo application of U1i. Moreover, we demonstrated long-term gene silencing by AAV-mediated transduction of murine muscle with RNAi/U1i constructs targeting firefly luciferase. In conclusion, these results provide a proof of principle for the combinatorial use of RNAi and U1i to enhance target gene knockdown in vivo.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Silenciamento de Genes , Luciferases/genética , Interferência de RNA , RNA Nuclear Pequeno , Animais , Dependovirus/genética , Fígado/metabolismo , Camundongos , Músculos/metabolismo
2.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 38(13): e136, 2010 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20427423

RESUMO

RNA interference (RNAi) has been revolutionary for the specific inhibition of gene expression. However, the application of RNAi has been hampered by the fact that many siRNAs induce dose-dependent unwanted secondary effects. Therefore, new methods to increase inhibition of gene expression with low doses of inhibitors are required. We have tested the combination of RNAi and U1i (U1 small nuclear RNA--snRNA--interference). U1i is based on U1 inhibitors (U1in), U1 snRNA molecules modified to target a pre-mRNA and inhibit its gene expression by blocking nuclear polyadenylation. The combination of RNAi and U1i resulted in stronger inhibition of reporter or endogenous genes than that obtained using either of the techniques alone. The increased inhibition observed is stable over time and allows higher inhibition than the best obtained with either of the inhibitors alone even with decreased doses of the inhibitors. We believe that the combination of RNAi and U1i will be of interest when higher inhibition is required or when potent inhibitors are not available. Also, the combination of these techniques would allow functional inhibition with a decreased dose of inhibitors, avoiding toxicity due to dose-dependent unwanted effects.


Assuntos
Interferência de RNA , RNA Nuclear Pequeno/antagonistas & inibidores , Linhagem Celular , Regulação para Baixo , Genes Reporter , Células HeLa , Humanos , Luciferases/genética , Luciferases/metabolismo , RNA Interferente Pequeno/metabolismo , Receptor Notch1/genética , Receptor Notch1/metabolismo
3.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 74(1-2): 119-30, 2002 Mar 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11929166

RESUMO

A study of the presence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) and enterovirus (EV) in shellfish from the northwestern coast of Spain, one of the most important mussel producers in the world, was carried out employing dot-blot hybridization and RT-PCR techniques. In addition, bacterial contamination of the samples was evaluated by Escherichia coli (EC) counts, according to the European Union (EU) standards of shellfish microbiological quality. Shellfish samples included raft-cultured and wild mussels, as well as wild clams and cockles. Bacterial counts showed that the majority of samples (40.8%) could be classified as moderately polluted following the EU standards, and therefore should undergo depuration processes. However, differences in bacterial contamination were observed between cultured mussel and wild shellfish. Thus, percentage of clean samples (<230 EC/100 g shellfish) was clearly higher in cultured mussels (49.1%) than in wild mussels (22.8%) or clams and cockles (10.7%). HAV was detected in 27.4% and EV in 43.9% of the samples that were analyzed. Simultaneous detection of both viral types occurred in 14.1% of the samples. Statistical tests of dependence (chi-square test) showed no relationship either between viral and bacterial contamination, or between the presence of HAV and EV. Comparative analysis of hybridization and RT-PCR for viral detection yielded different results depending on the virus type that was studied, RT-PCR being effective for HAV but not for EV detection. The obtained results reinforce once again the inadequacy of bacteriological standards to assess viral contamination and suggest that although virological analysis of shellfish is possible by molecular techniques, interlaboratory standardization and validation studies are needed before the routine use in monitoring shellfish microbiological safety.


Assuntos
Enterovirus/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Hepatite A/isolamento & purificação , Moluscos/virologia , Frutos do Mar/microbiologia , Frutos do Mar/normas , Animais , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Enterovirus/genética , União Europeia , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Vírus da Hepatite A/genética , Immunoblotting/métodos , Moluscos/microbiologia , Prevalência , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Frutos do Mar/virologia , Espanha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA