RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of plasma levels of soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells (sTREM)-1 to diagnose infection in critical patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). DESIGN AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 114 patients with SIRS criteria. The patients' plasma levels of sTREM-1 were measured within 24h of admission to the intensive care unit. The final diagnosis of infection was made independently by two investigators, who were blinded to the levels of sTREM-1. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve of sTREM-1 for the diagnosis of sepsis was 0.62 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.51-0.72). The diagnostic odds ratio of sTREM-1 after adjusting for the Infection Probability Score and procalcitonin plasma levels was 1.81 (95% CI 0.66-4.98; p=0.2508). CONCLUSIONS: In critical patients admitted with SIRS, sTREM-1 has poor discriminative power to identify patients with infection, and sTREM-1 levels do not add diagnostic information to that provided by other routinely available clinical tests.
Assuntos
Glicoproteínas de Membrana/sangue , Receptores Imunológicos/sangue , Sepse/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Receptor Gatilho 1 Expresso em Células MieloidesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of B-type natriuretic peptide levels (BNP) in the diagnosis of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. DATA SOURCES: Electronic search in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Medion database, and hand search of reference lists. REVIEW METHODS: We have included published studies on the accuracy of BNP which had both sufficient information to construct the 2x2 diagnostic cross table and an appropriate spectrum of patients. RESULTS: Fifty five studies (16,730 patients) were analyzed. The main determinants of diagnostic accuracy were the reference standard analyzed (clinical heart failure versus left ventricular dysfunction), and the methodological quality of the study. BNP levels were highly accurate for the diagnosis of clinical heart failure (diagnostic OR=41; 95% CI 23-74). The negative likelihood ratios were homogeneous, and useful for excluding the existence of heart failure (pooled negative likelihood ratio=0.11; 95% CI 0.08-0.16). The studies focused on the identification of left ventricular dysfunction were heterogeneous, with indications of publication bias, and showed less overall diagnostic accuracy than studies focused on heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: BNP levels are useful for ruling out heart failure. The accuracy of BNP for identifying patients with systolic dysfunction is more limited.