Inter-rater reliability of the digital palpation of pelvic floor muscle by the modified Oxford Grading Scale in continent and incontinent women. / Fiabilidad inter evaluador de la palpación digital de los músculos del suelo pélvico utilizando la escala modificada de Oxford graduada en mujeres continentes e incontinentes.

OBJECTIVE: The first choice treatment in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is rehabilitation of the pelvic floor in order to improve muscle strength. However, no entirely reliable instruments for quantifying pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength are currently available. Our aim was to test the inter-rater reliability of the Modified Oxford Scale (MOS) used as the gold standard for measuring PFM strength. METHODS: Test-retest reliability study. One hundred and twenty-two women with SUI and thirty continent women were recruited. Patients were excluded if they had a history consistent with pelvic organ prolapse, pregnancy, previous urogynaecological surgery, or neurological conditions. Bidigital palpation quantified by the MOS was carried out by three independent examiners. Each subject answered a two-part questionnaire: demographic and clinical characteristics and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The Cohen's Kappa index with quadratic (Kw) weighting was used to assess the inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: 122 incontinent and 30 continent women were included. MOS ranged between 0 and 2 in 72.2% incontinent and 19.5% of continent women. The degree of agreement was substantial in the group of incontinent women (Kw between 0.73 and 0.81) and moderate in the group of continent women (Kw between 0.55 and 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the inter-observer reliability of MOS is improbable, especially in continent women.

OBJETIVO: El tratamiento de primera elección en la incontinencia urinaria de esfuerzo es la rehabilitación del suelo pélvico con el fin de mejorar la fuerza muscular. Sin embargo, actualmente no se dispone de instrumentos totalmente fiables para cuantificar la fuerza de la musculatura del suelo pélvico. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar la fiabilidad interobservador de la Escala de Oxford Modificada (MOS) utilizada como el patrón oro para medir la fuerza. MÉTODOS: Estudio de fiabilidad test-retest. Se reclutaron ciento veintidós mujeres con Incontinencia Urinaria de Esfuerzo y treinta mujeres continentes. Las pacientes fueron excluidas si presentaban: prolapso de órganos pélvicos, embarazo, cirugía uroginecológica previa, o enfermedades neurológicas. La palpación bidigital cuantificada con la Escala de Oxford Modificada fue realizada por tres examinadores independientes. Cada sujeto respondió a un cuestionario en dos partes: características demográficas y clínicas y el International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Forma abreviada (ICIQ-SF). Se utilizó el índice de Kappa de Cohen con ponderación cuadrática (Kw) para evaluar el acuerdo entre evaluadores. RESULTADOS: El MOS osciló entre 0 y 2 en el 72,2% de incontinentes y el 19,5% de las mujeres continentes. El grado de concordancia fue considerable en el grupo de mujeres incontinentes (Kw entre 0,73 y 0,81) y moderado en el grupo de mujeres continentes (Kw entre 0,55 y 0,72).CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestros resultados sugieren que la fiabilidad interobservador de la MOS es mejorable, especialmente en las mujeres continentes.

The efficacy of a supervised exercise training programme on readmission rates in patients with myocardial ischemia: results from a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The results of research into the outcomes of physical rehabilitation and its relationship with post-myocardial ischaemia survival and readmissions are inconclusive. Our primary aim was to evaluate the efficacy of a supervised exercise training programme in terms of decreasing hospital cardiac readmission in patients with myocardial ischaemia. METHODS: We conducted a randomised controlled trial including patients with myocardial ischaemia. Eligible patients were assigned to a control group receiving standard care or to an intervention group that took part in a supervised exercise training programme. The follow-up period was 12 months after hospital discharge. RESULTS: Of 478 patients assessed for eligibility, 86 were randomised to the control group ( n = 44) or the intervention group ( n = 42). Cardiac readmission rates were 14% versus 5% ( p = 0.268) in the control and intervention groups, respectively, and all-cause readmission rates were 23% versus 15% ( p = 0.34). There were no deaths in either group. More control patients were treated in the emergency services (50% vs. 24%; p = 0.015). In terms of health-related quality of life, patients in the intervention group presented with significant increases in functional capacity and mobility. More intervention patients returned to work (77.3% vs. 36.0%; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The supervised physical exercise programme was effective at reducing the number of emergency room visits and at increasing the percentage of patients who returned to work. It also improved patients' exercise capacity and increased their health-related quality of life. Although the results were promising, the programme was not associated with a significant reduction in cardiac and all-cause readmission rates.

Intra-rater reliability and diagnostic accuracy of a new vaginal dynamometer to measure pelvic floor muscle strength in women with urinary incontinence.

AIMS: The first choice treatment in urinary incontinence (UI) is rehabilitation of the pelvic floor in order to improve muscle strength. However, no entirely reliable instruments for quantifying pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength are currently available. Our aim was to test the intra-rater reliability and diagnostic accuracy of a new vaginal dynamometer for measuring PFM strength. METHODS: Test-retest reliability study. One hundred and four women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) were recruited. Patients were excluded if they had a history consistent with urge urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse, pregnancy, previous urogynecological surgery, severe vaginal atrophy, or neurological conditions. The examination comprised digital palpation quantified by the modified Oxford scale and by two consecutive dynamometry measurements obtained using a new prototype dynamometer. This instrument comprises a speculum in which an inductive displacement sensor (LVDTSM210.10.2.KTmodel, Schreiber) is attached to a spring of known stiffness constant (k). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess intra-rater reliability. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves analysis. RESULTS: Of the 104 subjects included, 59.6% presented scores between 0-2 on the Oxford scale. Intra-rater reliability was 0.98 (95%CI: 0.97-0.99). In the Bland & Altman plot, the distribution of disagreements was similar in the lowest and the highest strength values. The diagnostic accuracy of the dynamometer with regard to digital palpation showed an area under the curve of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.77-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that this new vaginal dynamometer is a reliable and valid instrument for quantifying PFM strength. Neurourol. Urodynam. 36:333-337, 2017. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of a supervised exercise training program on readmissions in patients with myocardial ischemia: a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, several studies have assessed the value of cardiac rehabilitation as secondary prevention and have reported substantial reductions in readmissions. However, conclusive evidence is scarce. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a supervised exercise training program for improving percentages of hospital readmission for cardiac causes in patients with myocardial ischemia in the first year after a cardiac event. The effect on all-cause readmission, all-cause mortality, functional capacity, quality of life and adherence to regular exercise is also discussed. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will be conducted as a randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to a control group receiving standard care or to an intervention group which, in addition to standard care, will take part in a supervised exercise training program consisting of three hours a week (spread over three alternate days) of supervised exercise training for 10 weeks. Both groups will perform an exercise stress test and a blood test during the first and third month after hospital discharge. The follow-up period will be 12 months after hospital discharge. The primary outcome measures will be the percentage of patients readmitted, total number of readmissions and length of hospitalization for cardiac disease during the first year after hospital discharge, and time to first hospital admission for cardiac disease. DISCUSSION: A representative group of hospitalized patients after myocardial ischemia will be studied in order to provide comprehensive data on the potential impact of a supervised exercise training program on hospital readmission rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN57634424.