Model predictive control (MPC) applied to a simplified model, magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (MNPH) treatment process.

Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (MNPH) has emerged as a promising cancer treatment that complements conventional ionizing radiation and chemotherapy. MNPH involves injecting iron-oxide nanoparticles into the tumor and exposing it to an alternating magnetic field (AMF). Iron oxide nanoparticles produce heat when exposed to radiofrequency AMF due to hysteresis loss. Minimizing the non-specific heating in human tissues caused by exposure to AMF is crucial. A pulse-width-modulated AMF has been shown to minimize eddy-current heating in superficial tissues. This project developed a control strategy based on a simplified mathematical model in MATLAB SIMULINK®to minimize eddy current heating while maintaining a therapeutic temperature in the tumor. A minimum tumor temperature of 43 [°C] is required for at least 30 [min] for effective hyperthermia, while maintaining the surrounding healthy tissues below 39 [°C]. A model predictive control (MPC) algorithm was used to reach the target temperature within approximately 100 [s]. As a constrained MPC approach, a maximum AMF amplitude of 36 [kA/m] and increment of 5 [kA/m/s] were applied. MPC utilized the AMF amplitude as an input and incorporated the open-loop response of the eddy current heating in its dynamic matrix. A conventional proportional integral (PI) controller was implemented and compared with the MPC performance. The results showed that MPC had a faster response (30 [s]) with minimal overshoot (1.4 [%]) than PI controller (115 [s] and 5.7 [%]) response. In addition, the MPC method performed better than the structured PI controller in its ability to handle constraints and changes in process parameters.

Development of a Treatment Planning Framework for Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT).

PURPOSE: Develop a treatment planning framework for neurosurgeons treating high-grade gliomas with LITT to minimize the learning curve and improve tumor thermal dose coverage. METHODS: Deidentified patient images were segmented using the image segmentation software Materialize MIMICS©. Segmented images were imported into the commercial finite element analysis (FEA) software COMSOL Multiphysics© to perform bioheat transfer simulations. The laser probe was modeled as a cylindrical object with radius 0.7 mm and length 100 mm, with a constant beam diameter. A modeled laser probe was placed in the tumor in accordance with patient specific patient magnetic resonance temperature imaging (MRTi) data. The laser energy was modeled as a deposited beam heat source in the FEA software. Penne's bioheat equation was used to model heat transfer in brain tissue. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was modeled as a solid with convectively enhanced conductivity to capture heat sink effects. In this study, thermal damage-dependent blood perfusion was assessed. Pulsed laser heating was modeled based on patient treatment logs. The stationary heat source and pullback heat source techniques were modeled to compare the calculated tissue damage. The developed bioheat transfer model was compared to MRTi data obtained from a laser log during LITT procedures. The application builder module in COMSOL Multiphysics© was utilized to create a Graphical User Interface (GUI) for the treatment planning framework. RESULTS: Simulations predicted increased thermal damage (10-15%) in the tumor for the pullback heat source approach compared with the stationary heat source. The model-predicted temperature profiles followed trends similar to those of the MRTi data. Simulations predicted partial tissue ablation in tumors proximal to the CSF ventricle. CONCLUSION: A mobile platform-based GUI for bioheat transfer simulation was developed to aid neurosurgeons in conveniently varying the simulation parameters according to a patient-specific treatment plan. The convective effects of the CSF should be modeled with heat sink effects for accurate LITT treatment planning.