Perforator-Based Pedicled Cross-Leg Flaps in Pediatric Patients: A New Idea to Increase Flap Reach.

BACKGROUND: Distal lower limb reconstruction is one of the most difficult and challenging tasks in plastic surgery. Despite the continuous advances in microsurgical techniques, pedicled cross-leg flaps still have a major role particularly in pediatric patients. Many techniques have been described to maximize the potential of the cross-leg flaps. The introduction of fasciocutaneous flaps has provided more potentials and made lower leg reconstruction easier and more successful. The description of perforator system in the leg has also made a revolution in the regional reconstruction. In this report, we present a new modification that increases the reach and facilitates the inset of the flaps. METHODS: The flap is taken from the posteromedial skin of the middle third of the leg. The design is determined by the location, size, and shape of the defect. The base of the flap should contain at least 2 perforators located by Doppler device. After elevation of the fasciocutaneous flap, 2 back cuts are performed in the upper and lower edge of the flap base preserving the 2 previously located perforators. RESULTS: Fifty patients, 32 males and 18 females, were reviewed and presented. Age of the patients ranged from 4 to 13 years and the defect size ranged from 20 to 130 cm. All flaps survived with 3 flaps had mild marginal ischemia, 2 flaps had mild infection, and 1 flap had partial dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Back cuts made at the edges of the base of a cross-leg flap, preserving the feeding perforators, can increase the flap reach without jeopardizing its viability. It is also an easy to do technique and does not require any extra equipment or time.

Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome: A Report of 7 Patients and Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Saethre-Chotzen syndrome is a genetic condition characterized by craniofacial and limb anomalies, with craniosynostosis (mainly coronal) being the most frequent craniofacial finding. Cranial and facial deformities can be extremely variable requiring individualization of treatment strategies. We present our case series to highlight clinical findings, treatment philosophy, and challenges facing Saethre-Chotzen patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on records of patients given a diagnosis of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Craniofacial Clinic (n = 7) between 1980 and 2010. Patients with complete records were included in this study, and review of demographic data, clinical findings, surgical interventions and postoperative follow-up, and stability were performed. RESULTS: Seven patients (1 male and 6 female) were included in this study. The average age at which the patients were first seen was 6.5 years. Suture involvement was bicoronal (n = 6) and unicoronal (n = 1). There was 1 patient having superimposed metopic synostosis, and there was another patient having Kleeblattschädel deformity. Previous procedures performed for patients before establishing care at UCLA were strip craniectomy (n = 2) and fronto-orbital advancement (n = 2). All patients (n = 7) had fronto-orbital advancements at UCLA. Other skeletal operations included the following: redo forehead advancement and contouring (n = 3), monobloc advancement (n = 1), and LeFort III distraction (n = 1). Five patients reached skeletal maturity, and 2 patients received LeFort I advancement for class III malocclusion, one of which also required a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. CONCLUSION: Clinical presentation and severity of deformity in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome are variable. Our current report reviews our treatment strategies and illustrates the predominance of cranial and upper face deformities and frequent need for redo surgeries to address forehead asymmetry in this group of syndromic craniosynostosis patients.

Management of cleft lip and palate in Egypt: A National survey.

BACKGROUND: Variable protocols for the management of cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) patients are currently used. However, to our knowledge, there are no previously published data about cleft management and practice in Egypt. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred questionnaires were distributed to cleft surgeons attending the annual meeting of the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons in March 2016 to investigate timing, techniques and complications of cleft surgery. Seventy-two colleagues returned the questionnaire, and the data were analysed using Microsoft Excel software. RESULTS: The majority of cleft lip cases are repaired between 3 and 6 months. Millard and Tennison repairs for unilateral cleft lip, while Millard and Manchester techniques for bilateral cleft lip are the most commonly performed. Cleft palate is usually repaired between 9 and 12 months with the two-flap push-back technique being the most commonly used. The average palatal fistula rate is 20%. Pharyngeal flap is the method of choice to correct velopharyngeal incompetence. Polyglactin 910 is the most commonly used suture material in cleft surgery in the country. Multidisciplinary cleft management is reported only by 16.5% of participants. CONCLUSION: Management of CLP in Egypt is mainly dependent on personal preference, not on constitutional protocols. There is a lack of multidisciplinary approach and patients' registration systems in the majority of centres. The establishment of cleft teams from the concerned medical specialties is highly recommended for a more efficient care of cleft patients.