Rare testicular tumor discovered by assault: an unusual presentation of a primary testicular neuroendocrine tumor grade 2.

Testicular neuroendocrine tumors (NET) or carcinoid tumors are rare neoplasms which represent 1% of all testicular tumors and can be divided into 3 subgroups: pure primary testicular NET, primary testicular NET associated with a teratoma, and NET metastases to the testis. We report an unusual presentation of a primary testicular neuroendocrine tumor in a 39-year-old male who presented after a physical altercation during a soccer game. Histology showed a diffuse infiltrating tumor with extensive involvement of the tunica albuginea and tunica vaginalis. Immunohistochemical expression of CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin A was strongly positive in the tumor cells. Foci of tumor cell necrosis and occasional mitotic figures as well as extensive lymph-vascular invasion were also identified. A review of the literature reveals differing opinions on the prognostic significance of primary tumor size, mitotic index, tumor necrosis, and nuclear atypia. In our patient, the increased mitotic rate (3-5 mitotic figures per 10 hpf and a Ki-67 index of 5%), foci of necrosis, and mild to moderate nuclear atypia warranted a diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor grade 2, formerly atypical carcinoid. Long term surveillance in these patients is essential as metastasis occurs in up to 15% of cases. At the 6-month followup, the patient remains symptom free.

Eosinophils in mycosis fungoides: an uncommon finding in the patch and plaque stages.

Early diagnosis of mycosis fungoides (MF) is one of the most challenging problems in dermatopathology, as the histopathologic features of inflammatory dermatoses and MF may show significant overlap. One criterion used to distinguish early MF (patch stage) from dermatitis, which may be currently underutilized, is the presence of eosinophils. A search was performed for cases with a preoperative diagnosis of MF, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or dermatitis, which included 29 cases "diagnostic" for MF, 25 cases "suspicious" for MF, and 55 cases of spongiotic dermatitis. We examined tissue sections blinded to diagnosis to obtain an exact eosinophil count. Twenty-nine cases were diagnostic for MF (12 patch, 9 plaque, and 8 tumor stage). The average eosinophil count for cases diagnostic for patch stage MF was 1 eosinophil in 10 (0.11) sections examined. For plaque MF, there was 1 eosinophil in 5 (0.24) sections examined. All tumor stage MF cases showed abundant eosinophils within each section. Twenty-five cases were suspicious for MF (15 patches, 9 plaques, and 1 folliculotropic). The average eosinophil count for the patch lesions was 1 eosinophil in 4 (0.25) sections examined and 2 eosinophils per section for plaque lesions. Forty-five of 55 cases of spongiotic dermatitis had at least scattered eosinophils (>3) in each section. Twenty-three (47%) had eosinophils around most postcapillary venules. Only 3 of 45 patients (6.6%) with biopsies diagnostic or suspicious for patch or plaque stage MF showed >3 eosinophils per tissue section, whereas 45 of 55 (81.8%) biopsies of spongiotic dermatitis had >3. The presence of eosinophils (>3 per tissue section) is statistically significant in differentiating cases diagnostic or suspicious for patch or plaque stage MF from dermatitis (P < 0.0001). Our data indicate that eosinophils are uncommon in cases of patch and plaque MF. When a pathologist is faced with evaluating a biopsy that lacks some of the criteria used to make the diagnosis of patch stage MF, yet demonstrates >3 eosinophils per tissue section, dermatitis is the likely diagnosis. However, in cases where fewer than 3 eosinophils are present in sections, patch stage MF cannot be excluded.