Pharmacist-Initiated De-Prescribing Efforts Reduce Inappropriate Continuation of Acid-Suppression Therapy Initiated in the ICU.

OBJECTIVES: Stress ulcer prophylaxis initiated for intensive care unit (ICU)-specific indications is often continued upon transfer or discharge despite lack of indication. This quality improvement initiative aimed to achieve a 25% reduction from baseline in ICU-initiated acid suppression therapy prescriptions by May 2021. METHODS: This initiative was conducted in adult ICU patients at Boston Medical Center from July 2020 through May 2021. A multidisciplinary approach to de-prescribing was utilized, including the implementation of formalized stress ulcer prophylaxis criteria and an electronic handoff tool used to identify patients appropriate for assessment of acid suppression therapy continuation post-ICU stay. The primary outcome measure was the number of discharge prescriptions for ICU-initiated acid suppression therapy. Secondary endpoints included incidence of de-prescribing workflow failures, percentage of acid suppression therapy discharge prescriptions with inappropriate indications, and incidence of stress ulcer-related gastrointestinal bleeding. RESULTS: A 55% decrease in ICU-initiated acid suppression therapy discharge prescriptions occurred after implementing the multidisciplinary workflow. The decrease was sustained for 28 weeks through the completion of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a pharmacist-initiated electronic handoff tool along with provider education and creation of formalized stress ulcer prophylaxis criteria may reduce the number of ICU-initiated acid suppression therapy prescriptions inadvertently or inappropriately continued at discharge.

Implementation of a Phenobarbital-based Pathway for Severe Alcohol Withdrawal: A Mixed-Method Study.

Rationale: Several institutions have implemented phenobarbital-based pathways for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). However, little is known about the care processes, effectiveness, and safety of phenobarbital-based pathways for intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Objectives: To examine clinician acceptability and feasibility and patient outcomes after the implementation of a phenobarbital-based pathway for medical ICU (MICU) patients with severe AWS. Methods: We conducted a mixed-method study of a quality-improvement intervention designed to improve the workflow without deleterious effects on outcomes. We used semistructured, qualitative interviews and surveys of clinicians to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the phenobarbital-based pathway and a previous benzodiazepine-based pathway. We used a noninferiority interrupted-time-series analysis to compare mechanical ventilation rates before and after implementation among MICU patients within an urban safety-net hospital who were admitted with severe alcohol withdrawal. We explored several secondary outcomes, including physical restraint use and hospital length of stay. Results: Four themes related to clinician acceptability and feasibility of the phenobarbital-based pathway emerged: 1) designing a pathway that balanced standardization with clinical judgment promoted acceptability, 2) pathway simplicity promoted feasibility, 3) implementing pathway-driven care streamlined the workflow, and 4) ad hoc implementation strategies facilitated new pathway uptake. Two hundred thirty-three and 252 patients were initiated on the benzodiazepine- and phenobarbital-based pathways, respectively. The rate of mechanical ventilation decreased from 17.1% to 12.9% after implementation of the phenobarbital-based pathway, and an adjusted mean difference of -4.9% (95% upper confidence interval [CI]: 0.7%) corresponding to relative change in the 95% upper limit of 4%, which was below the a priori noninferiority margin, was shown. After implementation, use of physical restraints decreased from 51.6% to 32.4% (mean difference, -18.0%; 95% CI: -26.4% to -9.7%), and the hospital length of stay was shorter (8.6-6.8 d; mean difference, -1.8 d; 95% CI: -3.4 to -0.2 d). Conclusions: Clinicians believed that the phenobarbital-based pathway was more efficient and simpler to use, and patient mechanical ventilation rates were noninferior compared with the previous benzodiazepine-based pathway for the treatment of severe AWS.

Single-dose sodium polystyrene sulfonate for hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease.

BACKGROUND: The use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) for the treatment of hyperkalemia lacks sufficient efficacy data in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD); however, use remains widespread. Recent evidence suggests that this population may be at risk for serious gastrointestinal adverse effects with SPS. Methods. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study. Adult patients with CKD Stages 4, 5, or ESRD maintained on renal replacement therapy with serum potassium >5 mEq/L and receipt of SPS were screened for inclusion. Our primary outcome was decrease in potassium within 24 h post-30 g oral SPS suspended in 33% sorbitol. Secondary outcomes included decrease in potassium within 24 h from 15 or 30 g SPS doses and gastrointestinal adverse events. RESULTS: Of 596 records, 114 were included for analysis. At the first serum potassium level within 24 h post-30 g oral SPS the median potassium decrease was 0.8 mEq/L [interquartile range (IQR) 0.4-1.1; P < 0.001]. At the first potassium level within 24 h post-15 or 30 g SPS, the median potassium decrease was 0.7 mEq/L (IQR 0.4-1.0; P < 0.001]. Post-SPS potassium levels occurred 14-16 h post-SPS. Gastrointestinal side effects occurred within 30 days of SPS in 5% of patients, although only two cases were classified as possibly associated. CONCLUSIONS: The use of single-dose SPS monotherapy resulted in a significant decrease in serum potassium levels within 24 h in patients with CKD Stage 4, 5, or ESRD. However, it remains unclear if SPS is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal injury in this population.

Metoprolol vs. diltiazem in the acute management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the effects of metoprolol versus diltiazem in the acute management of atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular response (RVR) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of patients with HFrEF in AF with RVR receiving either intravenous push (IVP) doses of metoprolol or diltiazem was conducted between January 2012 and September 2016. The primary outcome was successful rate control within 30 min of medication administration, defined as a heart rate (HR) < 100 beats per minute or a HR reduction ≥ 20%. Secondary outcomes included rate control at 60 min, maximum median change in HR, and incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, or conversion to normal sinus rhythm within 30 min. Signs of worsening heart failure were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients included, 14 received metoprolol and 34 received diltiazem. The primary outcome, successful rate control within 30 min, occurred in 62% of the metoprolol group and 50% of the diltiazem group (p = 0.49). There was no difference in HR control at predefined time points or incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, or conversion. Although baseline HR varied between groups, maximum median change in HR did not differ. Signs of worsening heart failure were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: For the acute management of AF with RVR in patients with HFrEF, IVP diltiazem achieved similar rate control with no increase in adverse events when compared to IVP metoprolol.

Transition From Subcutaneous or Inhaled Treprostinil to Oral Treprostinil at Home in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Retrospective Case Series.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive condition that can lead to right ventricular failure and death. Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that has proven clinical efficacy in patients with PAH. Difficulties in the administration of inhaled and parenteral prostacyclins led to the development of extended-release treprostinil diolamine for oral use. Limited data exist on the transition to oral treprostinil. The purpose of this case series is to describe the transition from subcutaneous or inhaled treprostinil to oral treprostinil in the outpatient setting. With the current availability of oral prostacyclins and prostacyclins analogues, most transitions to oral therapy are done in the hospital setting resulting in increased cost and risk of hospital-acquired infections. Four patients on background phosphodiesterase type 5 therapy with baseline World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC) II PAH were transitioned at home. Three of the 4 patients were safely transitioned as outpatients and maintained WHO FC II status at 10 and 12 months. The fourth patient had worsening right heart failure and was admitted within 2 months of the transition and started back on parenteral prostacyclin therapy. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) increased in patients transitioning from inhaled therapy and decreased in the patient transitioning from subcutaneous therapy. The most common adverse event was nausea.

Impact of pharmacy student and resident-led discharge counseling on heart failure patients.

PURPOSE: Many health systems have implemented interventions to reduce the rate of heart failure readmissions. Pharmacists have the training and expertise to provide effective medication-related education. However, few studies have examined the impact of discharge education provided by pharmacy students and residents on patients hospitalized with heart failure exacerbations. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized intervention study evaluating the impact of a pharmacy student and resident-led discharge counseling program on heart failure readmissions. The primary end point was the 30-day heart failure readmission rate. Secondary end points included self-reported patient understanding of medications, number of medication errors documented, and estimated associated cost avoidance. RESULTS: A total of 86 and 94 patients were enrolled into the intervention and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference in readmission rates was detected between the intervention and the control groups. Thirty-four medication errors and discrepancies were documented, or 1 for every 2.5 patients counseled, resulting in an estimated cost avoidance of $4241 for the institution. Eighty-nine percent of patients who received discharge counseling agreed they had a better understanding of their medications after speaking with a pharmacy resident or student. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in readmission rates; however, several medication errors were prevented, and a large percentage of patients expressed an improved understanding of their medications.

Comparative effects of nesiritide and nitroglycerin on renal function, and incidence of renal injury by traditional and RIFLE criteria in acute heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal insufficiency is associated with poorer outcomes in heart failure. Data regarding the renal effects of vasodilatory therapy in acute heart failure are inconclusive. HYPOTHESIS: Nesiritide and nitroglycerin are associated with differing effects on the incidence of acute renal injury and glomerular filtration rate changes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with acute congestive heart failure who received intravenous nesiritide or nitroglycerin for ≥6 hours. Acute kidney injury was assessed by risk, injury, failure, loss, and end stage (RIFLE) classification (creatinine/GFR criteria) and by traditional acute rise in creatinine of 0.3 mg/dL or 25%. Secondary endpoints included change in estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum creatinine, serum blood urea nitrogen, blood pressure, and urine output. RESULTS: A total of one hundred and thirty-one patients (age 57 ± 12 years, 67% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 38 ± 35%, 30% ischemic) received nesiritide (N = 37) or nitroglycerin (N = 94). Diuretic regimen and doses were similar in both the groups. Mean duration of therapy was not different (nesiritide 38.6 ± 35.7 h vs nitroglycerin 30.7 ± 22.6 h, P = .13). No differences were detected in incidence of renal injury using either criteria (RIFLE: nesiritide 19% vs nitroglycerin 22%, P = .88; traditional: 22% vs 34%, P = .16); however, glomerular filtration rate declined (-1 ± 18 mL/min vs -9 ± 21 mL/min, P = .03) and blood urea nitrogen increased (-0.2 ± 9.9 mg/dL vs 4.2 ± 9.1 mg/dL, P = .02) to a greater degree with nitroglycerin. Nesiritide was associated with lower hourly blood pressures and a higher incidence of systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: The incidence of renal injury was not different between nesiritide- and nitroglycerin-treated patients with acute heart failure; however, nitroglycerin was associated with a decline in glomerular filtration rate and increase in blood urea nitrogen despite higher baseline and on treatment blood pressures.