Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 46
Filtrar
1.
Foot Ankle Int ; 43(8): 1092-1098, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35642680

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The operative treatment of pilon fractures is classically treated with a staged protocol with ankle spanning external fixator, followed by definitive open reduction and internal fixation in order to decrease risk of soft tissue complications and infection. However, treatment of pilon fractures with patrial tibial fixation in addition to ankle spanning external fixation at the time of index procedure may facilitate final fixation while avoiding complications that were associated with acute definitive fixation. METHODS: Retrospective cohort series of 113 patients treated for pilon fractures from September 2012 to November 2018 at a single level 1 trauma center. Charts were reviewed to compare patients who underwent traditional management with a staged protocol and those who had a limited tibial reduction and fixation (LTRF) during the index procedure. The main outcome measurement was time to definitive fixation. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of patients (29 of 113) had limited tibial reduction and fixation (LTRF) during index surgery. Mean time between index procedure and definitive ORIF was 4.75 days less for LTRF cohort compared to standard stage cohort (10.86 ± 7.44 vs. 15.61 ± 8.59 days, P = .009). The index procedure took on average 51 minutes longer in the LTRF cohort (P < .001), yet definitive procedure operative time was decreased by an average of 98 minutes (P < .001), and overall (index plus definitive) operative duration was shortened by an average of 50 minutes (P = .044). There was no difference in rate of infection between LTRF (3.1%) and traditional treatment (2.5%) (P = .86) or reduction quality (P = .270). There were no nonunions in either treatment group. CONCLUSION: Patients who had LTRF had quicker time to definitive ORIF and decreased operative time for definitive ORIF. There was no difference in infection rate, reduction quality, or nonunion rate between groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Retrospective Cohort Study.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo , Fraturas da Tíbia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fixadores Externos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 32(5): 965-971, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34226952

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Iliosacral (IS) and transsacral (TS) screws are commonly used to stabilize pelvic ring injuries. The course of the superior gluteal artery (SGA) can be close to implant insertion paths. The third sacral segment (S3) has been described as a viable osseous fixation pathway (OFP) but the proximity of the SGA to the S3 screw path is unknown. METHODS: Fifty uninjured patients with contrasted pelvic computed tomograms (CTA) were identified with an S3 path large enough for a 7.0 mm TS screw. Starting sites for S1 IS or TS, S2 and S3 TS screws were located on the volume rendered lateral CTA image and transferred onto the surface rendered 3D CTA with the SGA clearly visible. The distance from screw start sites to the SGA was measured. A distance less than 3.5 mm was considered likely for injury. RESULTS: The average distances from screw start sites to the SGA were 23.0 ± 7.9 mm for S1 IS screws, 14.3 ± 6.4 mm for S2 TS screws and 25.9 ± 6.5 mm for S3 TS screws. No S1 IS screws, 5 S2 TS screws (10%), and no S3 TS screws were projected to cause injury to the SGA. CONCLUSIONS: The osseous start site and soft tissue path for an S3 TS screw is remote from the SGA. The S1 IS and S3 TS pathways are further away from the SGA while the S2 TS pathway is closer and may theoretically pose a higher injury risk in patients with an available S3 OFP.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Ossos Pélvicos , Artérias/diagnóstico por imagem , Artérias/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Ílio/cirurgia , Ossos Pélvicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Ossos Pélvicos/cirurgia , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Sacro/lesões , Sacro/cirurgia
3.
J Orthop Trauma ; 36(7): e265-e270, 2022 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924510

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of traction radiographs with 2-dimensional computed tomography (2D CT) in distal humerus fracture classification and characterization. DESIGN: Randomized controlled radiographic review of retrospectively collected data. SETTING: Academic Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Skeletally mature patients with intra-articular distal humerus fractures with both traction radiographs and CT scans were reviewed by 11 orthopaedists from different subspecialties and training levels. INTERVENTION: The intervention involved traction radiographs and 2D CT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome measurements included interobserver and intraobserver reliability of fracture classification by the OTA/AO and Jupiter-Mehne and determination of key fracture characteristics. RESULTS: For the OTA/AO and Jupiter-Mehne classifications, we found a moderate intraobserver agreement with both 2D CT and traction radiographs (κ = 0.70-0.75). When compared with traction radiographs, 2D CT improved the interobserver reliability of the OTA/AO classification from fair to moderate (κ = 0.3 to κ = 0.42) and the identification of a coronal fracture from slight to fair (κ = 0.2 to κ = 0.34), which was more pronounced in a subgroup analysis of less-experienced surgeons. When compared with 2D CT, traction radiographs improved the intraobserver reliability of detecting stable affected articular fragments from fair to substantial (κ = 0.4 to κ = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Traction radiographs provide similar diagnostic characteristics as 2D CT in distal humerus fractures. For less-experienced surgeons, 2D CT may improve the identification of coronal fracture lines and articular comminution.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Tração , Humanos , Úmero , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
4.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 18: 181-186, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33967549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) placed unprecedented pressure on the healthcare system. Many institutions implemented a government-mandated restructured set of safety and administrative protocols to treat urgent orthopaedic trauma patients. The objective of this study was to compare two cohorts of patients, a COVID group and non-COVID control group, and to evaluate the effectiveness of safety measures outlined in the Rutgers Orthopaedic Trauma Patient Safety Protocol (ROTPSP). Secondary outcomes were to elucidate risk factors for complications associated with fractures and COVID-19. METHODS: Patients treated for orthopaedic traumatic injuries were retrospectively identified between March and May 2020, and compared to a series of patients from the same time period in 2018. Main outcome measures included surgical site infections (SSI), length of stay (LOS), post-operative LOS (poLOS), presentation to OR time (PORT), and length of surgery. RESULTS: After review, 349 patients (201 non-COVID, 148 COVID) undergoing 426 surgeries were included. Average LOS (11.91 days vs. 9.27 days, p = 0.04), poLOS (9.68 days vs. 7.39 days, p = 0.03), and PORT (30.56 vs. 25.59 h, p < 0.01) was significantly shorter in the COVID cohort. There were less SSI in the COVID group (5) compared to the non-COVID group (14) (p = 0.03). Overall complications were significantly lower in the COVID group. Patients receiving Cepheid tests had significantly shorter LOS and poLOS compared to patients receiving the RNA and DiaSorin tests (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). The Cepheid test carried the best benefit-to-cost ratio, 0.10, p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: The restructuring of care protocols caused by COVID-19 did not negatively impact perioperative complication rates, PORT or LOS. Cepheid COVID test type administered upon admission plays an integral role in a patient's hospital course by reducing both length of stay and hospital costs. This information demonstrates we can continue to treat orthopaedic trauma patients safely during the COVID-19 pandemic by utilizing strict safety protocols.

5.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 31(2): 383-389, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32902718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the second (S2) and third (S3) sacral segments have been established as potential osseous fixation pathways for screw fixation, the S2 body has been demonstrated to have inferior bone density when compared to the body of the first (S1) sacral segment. Caution regarding the use of iliosacral screws at this level has been advised as a result. As transiliac-transsacral screws traverse the lateral cortices of the posterior pelvis, they may be relying on bone with superior density for purchase, which could obviate this concern. The objective of this study was to compare the bone density of the posterior ilium and sacroiliac joint to that of the sacral body at the first (S1), second (S2), and third (S3) sacral levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case series was performed, reviewing the CT scans of 100 patients without prior pelvic trauma. Each CT was confirmed to have available osseous fixation pathways at the first (S1), second (S2), and third (S3) sacral segments. The bone density of the posterior ilium/sacroiliac joint (PISJ) and sacral body (SB) was measured using the embedded standardized Hounsfield units (HU) tool at each sacral level. RESULTS: The average S2 PISJ bone density (320.1) was significantly higher than the S1 (286.5) and S3 (278.9) PISJ (p < 0.0001) and S1 and S3 PISJ was not statistically different. The S1 sacral body bone density (231.1) was significantly higher than the S2 (182.1) and S3 (126.8) bone density (p < 0.0001). The PISJ bone density is greater than the sacral body at every sacral level (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The S2 PISJ bone density is significantly greater than S1. The S1, S2, and S3 PISJ bone density is greater than the sacral body at all sacral levels, and the S1 body has higher bone density than the S2 and S3 bodies. These differences in bone density may have implications for the stability of posterior pelvic ring fixation constructs with regard to screw purchase. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Case cohort series.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Ossos Pélvicos , Densidade Óssea , Parafusos Ósseos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Ílio/diagnóstico por imagem , Ílio/cirurgia , Ossos Pélvicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossos Pélvicos/cirurgia , Pelve , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Sacro/cirurgia
6.
Injury ; 52(4): 686-691, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33246644

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical attributes of patella fracture fixation with either anterior plating utilizing two parallel, longitudinal 2.0 mm plates technique versus a cannulated screw tension band technique. METHODS: Five matched pairs (ten specimens) of fresh frozen cadavers were utilized. A transverse patella fracture (OTA 34C1.1) was fixed using either two 4.0 mm cannulated screw anterior tension band (CATB) or with two 2.0 mm stainless steel non-locking plates along the anterior cortex secured with 2.4 mm cortical screws traversing the fracture site. Specimens underwent 1000 cycles of simulated active knee range of motion before load to failure destructive testing. RESULTS: During cyclic loading there were no failures in the plate fixation group, and 2 out of 5 specimens catastrophically failed in the CATB group (p = 0.22). Average fracture displacement at the end of fatigue testing was 0.96 mm in the plate fixation group and 2.72 mm in the CATB group (p = 0.18). The specimens that withstood cyclic testing underwent a destructive load. Mean load to failure for the plate fixation specimens was 1286 N, which was not significantly different from the CATB group mean of 1175 N (p = 0.48). The mechanism of failure in the plate fixation cohort was uniformly via a secondary vertical patella fracture around the plates in all five specimens. In the CATB group, the mechanism of failure was via wire elongation and backing out of the screws. CONCLUSIONS: Patella fixation with anterior plating technique statistically performed equivalent to cannulated screw anterior tension band in ultimate load to failure strength and fatigue endurance under cyclical loading. No failures were observed cyclic simulated active range of motion in the anterior plate group. There was a trend towards improved fatigue endurance in the plate fixation group, however this did not reach statistical significance. We believe plate fixation technique represents a low-profile implant option for treatment of transverse patella fractures, which may allow for early active range of motion, and these data support biomechanical equivalency to standard of care.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Patela , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Placas Ósseas , Cadáver , Fixação de Fratura , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Patela/cirurgia
7.
J Orthop Trauma ; 35(5): e177-e181, 2021 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32694377

RESUMO

SUMMARY: Restoration of anatomical alignment while preserving the soft-tissue envelope around the fracture site remains a challenge during distal femur fracture fixation. Although the lateral distal femoral locking plate allows surgeons to achieve adequate bony stability, their application has been associated with malalignment leading to inferior outcomes. We propose a biologically friendly, percutaneous technique that sequentially reduces and aligns distal femur fractures with an anterior external fixator before definitive fixation with a lateral distal femoral locking plate.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur , Placas Ósseas , Fixadores Externos , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fêmur , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos
8.
J Orthop Trauma ; 34(1): e6-e13, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851115

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Middle third clavicle fractures have long been managed conservatively with immobilization. Some patients, especially those with completely displaced or shortened clavicle fractures are now thought to have increased risk of nonunion or symptomatic malunion. The authors performed a meta-analysis to study the incidence of nonunion and symptomatic malunion and test the hypothesis that surgical fixation of these fractures significantly lowers the risk of these complications. METHODS: A search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials and quasi-experimental trials that compare outcomes of operative and nonoperative management for clavicle fractures that are fully (100%) displaced or have greater than 2 cm of shortening. Pooled patient data were used to construct forest plots for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies including 497 patients who were treated and 457 patients treated conservatively were analyzed. Patients managed operatively had significantly lower relative risk of developing nonunion [0.17 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.33)] and symptomatic malunion [0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.05-0.37)]. Plate fixation significantly reduced the risk of nonunion, but intramedullary nail fixation did not. There was no difference in Constant-Murley or DASH scores between the 2 treatment groups or in the rate of secondary operative procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo operative fixation of displaced middle-third clavicle fractures have a lower incidence of nonunion and symptomatic malunion. The clinical significance of this effect is uncertain, as functional scores were similar in both groups. Further research into the risk factors for nonunion and symptomatic malunion will be necessary to determine which patients benefit from operative fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Clavícula , Fraturas Ósseas , Placas Ósseas , Clavícula/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 27(21): 794-805, 2019 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31149969

RESUMO

Posttraumatic avascular necrosis (AVN) is osteonecrosis from vascular disruption, commonly encountered after fractures of the femoral neck, proximal humerus, talar neck, and scaphoid. These locations have a tenuous vascular supply; the diagnosis, risk factors, natural history, and treatment are reviewed. Fracture nonunion only correlates with AVN in the scaphoid. In the femoral head, the risk is increased for displaced fractures, but the time to surgery and open versus closed treatment do not seem to influence the risk. Patients with collapse are frequently symptomatic, and total hip arthroplasty is the most reliable treatment. In the humeral head, certain fracture patterns correlate with avascularity at the time of injury, but most do not go on to develop AVN due to head revascularization. Additionally, newer surgical approaches and improved construct stability appear to lessen the risk of AVN. The likelihood of AVN of the talar body rises with increased severity of talar injury. The development of AVN corresponds with a worse prognosis and increases the likelihood of secondary procedures. In proximal pole scaphoid fractures, delays in diagnosis and treatment elevate the risk of AVN, which is often seen in cases of nonunion. The need for vascularized versus nonvascularized bone grafting when repairing scaphoid nonunions with AVN remains unclear.


Assuntos
Fêmur/irrigação sanguínea , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Úmero/irrigação sanguínea , Osteonecrose/etiologia , Osso Escafoide/irrigação sanguínea , Tálus/irrigação sanguínea , Fêmur/lesões , Fêmur/cirurgia , Humanos , Úmero/lesões , Úmero/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Osteonecrose/cirurgia , Osso Escafoide/lesões , Osso Escafoide/cirurgia , Tálus/lesões , Tálus/cirurgia
10.
Foot Ankle Int ; 40(6): 634-640, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30841752

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The plantar fascia attaches to the tuberosity of the calcaneus, which produces a distinct plantar medial avulsion (PMA) fracture fragment in certain calcaneal fractures. We hypothesized that tongue-type fractures, as described by the Essex-Lopresti classification, were more likely to be associated with this PMA fracture than joint depression fractures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at 2 distinct Level I trauma centers to identify patients sustaining calcaneal fractures. Radiographs were then reviewed to determine the Essex-Lopresti classification, OTA classification, and presence of a PMA fracture. RESULTS: The review yielded 271 total patients with 121 (44.6%) tongue-type (TT), 110 (40.6%) joint depression (JD), and 40 (14.8%) fractures not classifiable by the Essex-Lopresti classification. In the TT group, 73.6% of the patients had the PMA fracture whereas only 8.2% of JD and 15.0% of nonclassifiable fractures demonstrated a PMA fragment ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: Plantar medial avulsion fractures occurred in 38.4% of the calcaneal fractures reviewed with a significantly greater proportion occurring in TT (73.6%) as opposed to JD (8.2%). Given the plantar fascia attachment to the PMA fragment, there may be clinical significance to identifying this fracture and changing treatment management; however, this requires further investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study.


Assuntos
Calcâneo/lesões , Fratura Avulsão/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/diagnóstico , Placa Plantar/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Calcâneo/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fratura Avulsão/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/fisiopatologia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco
11.
J Orthop Trauma ; 33 Suppl 2: S32-S36, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30688857

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We present a series of skeletally immature patients sustaining acetabular fractures. We hypothesized that if the secondary ossification centers of the acetabulum are not completely ossified, fractures often will not be identified on plain radiography. Our objective was to determine the efficacy of diagnostic plain radiography in these patients. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Urban, level-I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Skeletally immature patients with acetabular fractures following blunt force trauma. INTERVENTION: We obtained a dedicated axial computed tomographic (CT) scan of the pelvis with sequential sections of 2.5-mm thickness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The accuracy of plain radiography as compared with CT in diagnosing acetabular fractures in skeletally immature patients. RESULTS: Fourteen patients with 16 fractures of the acetabulum were identified by CT scan; however, 69% (11 of 16) were not visible on plain radiography. Radiographs were less likely to identify acetabular fractures compared with pelvic ring fractures [31% (5/16) vs. 92% (11/12); odds ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.37; P = 0.001]. Patients younger than 12 years were less likely to have acetabular fractures identified on plain radiography [9% (1/11) vs. 80% (4/5); odds ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.59; P = 0.013]. The mean age of patients whose acetabular fractures were not identified on plain radiography was less than those whose fractures were identified on plain radiography (7.6 ± 2.9 vs. 12.8 ± 1.6; P = 0.004). Acetabular fractures visible on plain radiography were more likely to require operative stabilization [60% (3/5) vs. 0% (0/11); P = 0.004]. CONCLUSIONS: In skeletally immature patients with suspected injury to the pelvis, particularly in patients younger than 12 years, diagnostic evaluation using plain radiographs alone may lead to missed injuries. If an acetabular fracture is identified, patients should be followed closely both clinically and radiographically to ensure early identification of any developing posttraumatic deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; Diagnostic-Investigating a diagnostic test.


Assuntos
Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagem , Acetábulo/lesões , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografia , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
J Orthop Trauma ; 32(11): 543-547, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30277990

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of concomitant posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs) in operative, distal-third, spiral tibia fractures. DESIGN: Prospective protocol with retrospective review of data. SETTING: Single, Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-three consecutive, skeletally mature patients with operatively treated fractures of the distal-third, tibial shaft and metaphysis. Pilon fractures were excluded. INTERVENTION: Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained in all distal-third, spiral fractures of the tibia to determine fracture morphology and presence of a PMF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The incidence of concurrent PMFs in operative spiral fractures of the distal tibia. RESULTS: Twenty-six distal-third, spiral fractures were identified with an ipsilateral PMF diagnosed in 92.3% of cases (24 cases). PMFs were over 25 times more likely to occur in distal-third, spiral fractures when compared with other distal-third fracture patterns (relative risk = 25.7, 95% confidence interval, 11.6-56.8). PMFs were treated with supplemental fixation in 23/24 (95.8%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high incidence of concomitant, ipsilateral fractures of the posterior malleolus in patients presenting with operative distal-third, spiral fractures of the tibia. A preoperative ankle computed tomography should be strongly considered in all cases with this specific fracture morphology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo/epidemiologia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Traumatismo Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/epidemiologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Fraturas do Tornozelo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismo Múltiplo/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
JBJS Case Connect ; 8(3): e64, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30134261

RESUMO

CASE: We present the case of a 10-year-old girl who sustained a transepiphyseal femoral neck fracture with posterior dislocation of the femoral epiphysis and an associated transverse posterior wall acetabular fracture, leading to complete separation of the capital femoral epiphysis. She underwent urgent operative intervention; she was followed for 13 years and achieved an excellent outcome. CONCLUSION: Pediatric hip fracture-dislocations are complex injuries that should be managed by a competent pelvic reconstructive surgeon in a well-resuscitated patient. If a quality reduction is obtained in a timely manner, the patient has the best chance of achieving a favorable long-term outcome.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral/cirurgia , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Articulação Sacroilíaca/lesões , Acidentes de Trânsito , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Ossos Pélvicos/cirurgia , Articulação Sacroilíaca/cirurgia
14.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 100(9): e60, 2018 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29715233

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic trauma fellowship applicants use online-based resources when researching information on potential U.S. fellowship programs. The 2 primary sources for identifying programs are the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) database and the San Francisco Match (SF Match) database. Previous studies in other orthopaedic subspecialty areas have demonstrated considerable discrepancies among fellowship programs. The purpose of this study was to analyze content and availability of information on orthopaedic trauma surgery fellowship web sites. METHODS: The online databases of the OTA and SF Match were reviewed to determine the availability of embedded program links or external links for the included programs. Thereafter, a Google search was performed for each program individually by typing the program's name, followed by the term "orthopaedic trauma fellowship." All identified fellowship web sites were analyzed for accessibility and content. Web sites were evaluated for comprehensiveness in mentioning key components of the orthopaedic trauma surgery curriculum. By consensus, we refined the final list of variables utilizing the methodology of previous studies on the topic. RESULTS: We identified 54 OTA-accredited fellowship programs, offering 87 positions. The majority (94%) of programs had web sites accessible through a Google search. Of the 51 web sites found, all (100%) described their program. Most commonly, hospital affiliation (88%), operative experiences (76%), and rotation overview (65%) were listed, and, least commonly, interview dates (6%), selection criteria (16%), on-call requirements (20%), and fellow evaluation criteria (20%) were listed. Programs with ≥2 fellows provided more information with regard to education content (p = 0.0001) and recruitment content (p = 0.013). Programs with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation status also provided greater information with regard to education content (odds ratio, 4.0; p = 0.0001). Otherwise, no differences were seen by region, residency affiliation, medical school affiliation, or hospital affiliation. CONCLUSIONS: The SF Match and OTA databases provide few direct links to fellowship web sites. Individual program web sites do not effectively and completely convey information about the programs. The Internet is an underused resource for fellow recruitment. The lack of information on these sites allows for future opportunity to optimize this resource.


Assuntos
Bolsas de Estudo , Internet , Ortopedia/educação , Acreditação , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Humanos , Estados Unidos
15.
J Orthop Trauma ; 32(4): 178-182, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29401088

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the osseous anatomy of the dysmorphic third sacral segment and assess its ability to accommodate internal fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of a trauma database. SETTING: University Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Fifty-nine patients over the age of 18 with computed tomography scans of the pelvis separated into 2 groups: a group with normal pelvic anatomy and a group with sacral dysmorphism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The sacral osseous area was measured on computed tomography scans in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes in normal and dysmorphic pelves. These measurements were used to determine the possibility of accommodating a transiliac transsacral screw in the third sacral segment. RESULTS: In the normal group, the S3 coronal transverse width averaged 7.71 mm and the S3 axial transverse width averaged 7.12 mm. The mean S3 cross-sectional area of the normal group was 55.8 mm. The dysmorphic group was found to have a mean S3 coronal transverse width of 9.49 mm, an average S3 axial transverse width of 9.14 mm, and an S3 cross-sectional area of 77.9 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The third sacral segment of dysmorphic sacra has a larger osseous pathway available to safely accommodate a transiliac transsacral screw when compared with normal sacra. The S3 segment of dysmorphic sacra can serve as an additional site for screw placement when treating unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures.


Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Sacro/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anatomia Transversal , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ossos Pélvicos/lesões , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Sacro/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto Jovem
16.
J Orthop Trauma ; 32(2): 93-99, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29065034

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To report the incidence of patients with a third sacral segment (S3) osseous fixation pathway (OFP) that could accommodate a transiliac-transsacral screw. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Regional Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 250 patients without pelvic trauma from January 2017 to February 2017 were included. INTERVENTION: The axial and sagittal reconstruction images of each patient's computed abdomen and pelvis tomography (CT) scans were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Each CT was evaluated for the presence of sacral dysmorphism and whether an S3 OFP that could accommodate an intraosseous transiliac-transsacral screw exists. RESULTS: There were 130 of the 250 patients (52%) with sacral dysmorphism. Overall, 38 of the 250 patients (15.2%) had an S3 OFP that could accommodate a 7.0-mm transiliac-transsacral style screw. When narrowed to patients who had an S3 OFP, 38 of 153 patients (24.8%) could accommodate a 7.0-mm transiliac-transsacral screw. Specific to the 38 patients with an adequate S3 OFP, 34 of 38 patients (89.5%) were noted to have sacral dysmorphism. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that 15.2% of patients have an S3 OFP large enough to accommodate an intraosseous implant. Patients who have sacral dysmorphism are more likely to have an adequate S3 OFP. Additional studies are needed to quantify the S3 OFP, understand the bone quality of the S3 segment and accompanying biomechanical implications, and investigate the anatomical concerns associated with S3 screw placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Sacro/anormalidades , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Parafusos Ósseos , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sacro/diagnóstico por imagem , Sacro/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Orthop Trauma ; 31(11): 606-609, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29053544

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of using the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA/AO) classification for both bone forearm fractures in predicting compartment syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Level 1 Academic Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-one patients 18 years of age and older, with both bone forearm fractures diagnosed from 2001 to 2016 were categorized based on the OTA/AO classification. Patients with both bone fractures caused by gunshot wounds were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The endpoint for our study was whether forearm fasciotomies were performed based on the presence of compartment syndrome. RESULTS: Of a total of 151 both bone forearm fractures, 15% underwent fasciotomy. Six of 80 (7.5%) grouped 22-A3, 8 of 44 (18%) grouped 22-B3, and 9 of 27 (33%) grouped 22-C underwent fasciotomies for compartment syndrome (P = 0.004). The relative risks of developing compartment syndrome for group 22-B3 versus 22-A3 was 2.42 (P = 0.08), 22-C versus 22-B3 was 1.83 (P = 0.15), and 22-C versus 22-A3 was 4.44 (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant correlation between the OTA/AO classification and the need for fasciotomies, with group C fractures representing the highest risk. Clinicians can use this information to have a higher index of suspicion for compartment syndrome based on OTA/AO classification to help minimize the risk of a missed diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Síndromes Compartimentais/epidemiologia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/cirurgia , Fraturas do Rádio/classificação , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Fraturas da Ulna/classificação , Fraturas da Ulna/cirurgia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Síndromes Compartimentais/etiologia , Síndromes Compartimentais/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Traumatismos do Antebraço/classificação , Traumatismos do Antebraço/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/classificação , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Injury ; 48(12): 2838-2841, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982481

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to analyze if the addition of CT changed the management of femoral shaft fractures caused by gunshot wounds when compared to those managed with plain radiography alone. METHODS: A multiple-choice, single-answer electronic survey was created to compare utility of advanced imaging when treating femur fractures resulting from gunshot injury. A total of ten femoral shaft fracture cause by gunshot injuries were selected for an online survey to be administered to orthopeaedic traumatologists. The survey compared the use the of fixation device and surgical planning before and after the CT scan. RESULTS: A total of 99 surveys were initiated, of which 82 were completed. For proximal shaft fractures, 37% of experts reported that a CT scan should be ordered based on the radiograph alone, prior to reviewing the CT. After reviewing the CT, 5% of experts reported that they would have performed a "major" change, and 10% reported that they would have performed a "minor" change. 4% of surveyors would have changed their decision regarding ordering a CT. For distal femoral shaft fractures, 42% of experts selected that a CT scan would have been ordered prior to reviewing the CT. After reviewing the CT, 2% would have performed a "major" change, and 8% would have performed a "minor" change in management. 5% of surveyors would have changed their decision regarding ordering a CT. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that CT scans are relatively unlikely to cause major changes in fracture management of gunshot-induced fractures of femoral shaft.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Ortopedia , Radiografia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Traumatologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Ortopedia/economia , Doses de Radiação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/efeitos adversos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatologia/economia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia
19.
Instr Course Lect ; 66: 51-61, 2017 Feb 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28594488

RESUMO

Calcaneal fractures are potentially devastating injuries. To effectively manage calcaneal fractures, surgeons must understand the anatomy of the calcaneus as well as the surgical techniques necessary to restore normal biomechanics of the foot. Surgeons also must understand calcaneal fracture patterns and classifications; initial management techniques, surgical indications and rationale, temporizing management techniques, surgical approaches, definitive management techniques, and postoperative management for calcaneal fractures; as well as outcomes and common complications of calcaneal fractures.


Assuntos
Calcâneo , Traumatismos do Pé , Fraturas Ósseas , Calcâneo/lesões , Traumatismos do Pé/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Humanos , Radiografia , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
J Orthop Trauma ; 31(6): 334-338, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28166168

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study was to compare the use of computer tomography with plain radiographs for the evaluation of intra-articular extension of long bone fractures in the lower extremity after low-energy gunshot wounds. DESIGN: Retrospective chart and radiographic review. SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from a single institution from 2000 to 2014. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients greater than 17 years of age, low-velocity gunshot injuries causing fracture of the femur or tibia, plain radiographs with adequate films, and computed tomography (CT) imaging of the fracture. This consisted of 133 patients with 140 fractures. INTERVENTION: Intra-articular fracture extension was evaluated on initial plain radiographs and CTs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of "gold standard" CT with all reviewers' evaluation of plain radiographs. RESULTS: There were 140 total fractures; 108 were femoral fractures and 32 were tibial fractures. By comparing plain radiographs with the gold standard CT, the reviewers demonstrated correct diagnosis in 85% of intra-articular fractures and 96% of non-intra-articular fractures. In addition, the reviewers accurately diagnosed 70.8% of intra-articular extensions in the diaphysis and 70.5% in the metaphysis. The sensitivity and specificity for plain radiographs were 85.3% and 96.0%, respectively, for all locations. Metaphyseal and diaphyseal fractures demonstrated the poorest sensitivity at 80.7% and 82.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Low-energy gunshot wounds with fractures in the diaphyseal of the distal femur and all metaphyseal fractures warrant CT evaluation to better examine for intra-articular fracture extension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Fraturas Intra-Articulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Intra-Articulares/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Perna/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Filme para Raios X/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causalidade , Criança , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Traumatismos da Perna/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA