Substance use and pre-hospital crash injury severity among U.S. older adults: A five-year national cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol and drug use (substance use) is a risk factor for crash involvement. OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between substance use and crash injury severity among older adults and how the relationship differs by rurality/urbanicity. METHODS: We pooled 2017-2021 cross-sectional data from the United States National Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Information System. We measured injury severity (low acuity, emergent, critical, and fatal) predicted by substance use, defined as self-reported or officer-reported alcohol and/or drug use. We controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, road user type, anatomical injured region, roadway crash, rurality/urbanicity, time of the day, and EMS response time. We performed a partial proportional ordinal logistic regression and reported the odds of worse injury outcomes (emergent, critical, and fatal injuries) compared to low acuity injuries, and the predicted probabilities by rurality/urbanicity. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of 252,790 older adults (65 years and older) road users. Approximately 67%, 25%, 6%, and 1% sustained low acuity, emergent, critical, and fatal injuries, respectively. Substance use was reported in approximately 3% of the population, and this proportion did not significantly differ by rurality/urbanicity. After controlling for patient, crash, and injury characteristics, substance use was associated with 36% increased odds of worse injury severity. Compared to urban areas, the predicted probabilities of emergent, critical, and fatal injuries were higher in rural and suburban areas. CONCLUSION: Substance use is associated with worse older adult crash injury severity and the injury severity is higher in rural and suburban areas compared to urban areas.

Evaluation of Ulnar Sided Wrist Pain.

Ulnar sided wrist pain often presents a diagnostic challenge. Creating a meaningful differential diagnosis is possible with a detailed history and systematic physical exam using provocative maneuvers. Targeted imaging studies can allow for further narrowing of the differential and ultimate diagnosis.

Thermal Debridement in the Management of Low Grade Scapholunate Ligament Tears.

Low grade scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) tears are often managed with mechanical or thermal arthroscopic debridement, although this remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes of thermal debride- ment of low-grade SLIL tears. Patients with low grade SLIL tears who underwent arthroscopic thermal debridement between 2010 and 2017 were identified and divided into two groups: isolated thermal debridement and concomitant pro- cedures. Patient reported outcomes, wrist range of motion, grip strength, return to work, and baseline activities were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients underwent isolated thermal debridement and 20 underwent concomitant procedures. Pain significantly improved in both groups. Grip strength significantly improved in the concomitant procedure group. There was no significant change in wrist range of motion in either group. Most patients returned to baseline activities. Arthroscopic thermal debridement provides good outcomes in patients with low grade SLIL tears both in isolation and in association with other injuries.

Do All Fractures Need Surgery?

Common fractures managed by orthopaedic surgeons include ankle fractures, proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years, humeral shaft fractures, and distal radius fractures. Recent trends indicate that surgical management is the best option for most fractures. However, there is limited evidence regarding whether most of these fractures need surgery, or whether there is a subset that could be managed without surgery, with no change in outcomes, or even possibly having improved results with lower complication rates with nonsurgical care.

Ability of a Risk Prediction Tool to Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Operative Distal Radius Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Distal radius fractures are the second most common fracture in the elderly population. The incidence of these fractures has increased over time, and is projected to continue to do so. The aim of this study is to utilize a validated trauma risk prediction tool to stratify middle-aged and geriatric patients with operative distal radius fractures as well as compare hospital quality metrics and inpatient hospitalization costs among the risk groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled in an orthopedic trauma registry. The Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA) was calculated using patient demographics, injury severity, and functional status. Patients were then stratified into minimal-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk cohorts based on their scores. Length of stay, need for escalation of care, complications, mortality, discharge location, 1-year patient reported outcomes, and index admission costs were evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-three (68.5%) patients were managed with outpatient surgery. The mean inpatient length of stay for the high-risk cohort was 2.9x and 2.2x higher than the minimal and moderate-risk cohorts, respectively (2.0 + 2.9 days vs. 0.7 + 0.9 and 0.9 + 1.1 days, P = .019). There were no complications or mortality in any of the risk groups. No patients required intensive care and all patients were discharged home. There was no difference in readmission rates, inpatient cost, or 1-year patient reported outcomes among the risk cohorts. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: The Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle-Aged is able to risk-stratify patients that undergo operative intervention of distal radius fractures. Middle aged and elderly patients with isolated closed distal radius fractures can be safely managed on an outpatient basis regardless of risk. Standardized pathways can be created in the management of these injuries, thereby optimizing value-based care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

Same-Day Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion-Our Protocol and Experience: Same-Day Discharge After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Suitable Patients has Similarly Low Readmission Rates as Admitted Patients.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is performed frequently, with studies demonstrating similar complication and readmission rates compared to traditional admission. Advantages include cost effectiveness, as well as lower risk of nosocomial infections and medical errors, which lead to quicker recovery and higher patient satisfaction. Protocols are needed to ensure that outpatient ACDF occurs safely. The objective of this study was to develop and implement a protocol with patient selection and discharge criteria for patients undergoing same-day discharge (SDD) ACDF and assess readmission rates. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients undergoing 1 or 2 level primary ACDF between March 2016 and March 2017 who were eligible for SDD according to the institutional protocol (Figure 1, Table 2). Patients with identical surgery and discharge dates were grouped as SDD, and admitted patients were grouped as same-day admission (SDA). Using our electronic health record's analytics, readmissions in the 90-day postoperative period were identified. RESULTS: Of the 434 patients identified, 126 patients were SDD, and 308 were SDA. Baseline characteristics such as age, operative time, and time in the recovery room were significantly different between the 2 groups (Table 2). The average length of stay of admitted patients was 1.48 days, with 77% discharged on postoperative day 1. There was an overall, noninferior readmission rate of 0.8% in the SDD group compared to 0.6% in the SDA group (P = .86). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the feasibility of outpatient ACDF and add a patient selection and discharge criteria to the literature. Proper identification of suitable patients using our protocol results in a noninferior readmission rate, allowing surgeons to continue to safely perform these surgeries with a low readmission rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: SDD is safe in the appropriate patient population.

Gastrointestinal Complications Warranting Invasive Interventions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are uncommon but can be associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The current literature on GI complications that warrant invasive procedures after TJA is lacking. This study reviews the incidence and outcomes of GI complications after TJA that went on to require invasive procedures. METHODS: All TJA patients at our institution between January 2012 and May 2018 who had GI complications requiring an invasive procedure within 30 days of TJA were identified and retrospectively chart reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate these patients. RESULTS: Of 19,090 TJAs in a 6-year period, 34 patients (0.18%) required invasive procedures for GI complications within 30 days of the index surgery. Twenty-two (64%) of the required procedures were endoscopy for suspected GI bleeding. Within this cohort, aspirin was the most common thromboprophylaxis used (63.6% of patients) and smoking was more prevalent (9.1% current smokers) (P = .28). Of the remaining 12 GI procedures required, 75% were exploratory laparotomies, 44.4% of which were performed for obstruction. Three (33.3%) of the exploratory laparotomy patients died during the study period. CONCLUSION: GI complications necessitating surgical intervention after TJA are rare. Suspected GI bleeding is the most common indication for intervention and is typically managed endoscopically. Other complications, such as GI obstruction, often require more extensive intervention and open procedures. Though rare, GI complications following TJA can lead to detrimental outcomes, significant patient morbidity, and occasionally mortality; therefore, a heightened awareness of these complications is warranted.

Rapid Acetabular Chondrolysis following Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip: A Poor Prognostic Sign.

Both hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty have been well described as effective methods of management for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Acetabular erosion is a common long-term complication of hemiarthroplasty. We present a case in which rapid acetabular erosion occurs within weeks of hemiarthroplasty, ultimately leading to an acetabular fracture and need for revision to total hip arthroplasty. Early and rapid acetabular erosion following hip hemiarthroplasty has not been well documented in current literature. It may lead to acetabular fracture and may be secondary to infectious causes. If encountered, an infection workup should be initiated.

Effect of perioperative steroids on dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery is common. Steroids potentially reduce post-operative inflammation that leads to dysphagia; however, the efficacy, optimal dose and route of steroid administration have not been fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the effect of peri-operative steroids on the incidence and severity of dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: A PubMed search adherent to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed to include clinical studies reporting use of steroids in adult patients following anterior cervical spine surgery. Data regarding steroid dose, route and timing of administration were abstracted. Incidence and severity of post-operative dysphagia were pooled across studies. RESULTS: Seven of 72 screened articles met inclusion criteria for a total of 246,298 patients that received steroids. Patients that received systemic and local steroids had significant reductions in rate and severity of dysphagia postoperatively. Reduction of dysphagia severity was more pronounced in patients undergoing multilevel procedures in both groups. There was no difference in infectious complications among patients that received steroids compared with controls. There was no difference in fusion rates at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Steroids may reduce dysphagia after anterior cervical spinal procedures in the early post-operative period without increasing complications. This may be especially beneficial in patients undergoing multilevel procedures. Future studies should further define the optimal dose and route of steroid administration, and the specific contraindications for use.