Primary retroperitoneal solitary fibrous tumor: A case report.

Primary retroperitoneal masses have numerous differential diagnoses, many of which are rare entities. These can be neoplastic or nonneoplastic. Among the rare conditions are solitary fibrous tumors, which can either be benign or malignant. It is a mesenchymal, spindle-cell tumor, reported first in 1931 as a pleural tumor by Klemperer et al. A 20-year-old lady, with abdominal pain for 6 months, was diagnosed with a retroperitoneal mass on the left lower abdomen on USG which was confirmed by an MRI scan of the abdomen. The patient underwent laparoscopy-assisted excision of the mass. The final histopathological reports and immunohistochemistry reports revealed a solitary fibrous tumor. Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare tumors in the retroperitoneum. In our search, fewer than a hundred cases have been reported. It has a characteristic "patternless pattern" in a microscopic study. Adverse outcomes of SFTs are associated with atypical features in histology, such as nuclear pleomorphism, necrosis, increased cellularity, and mitoses >4/10 HPF and size more than 10 cm. The standard of care is surgical excision with clear margins. Open surgeries have been done traditionally; we present a case where we performed the excision laparoscopically.

Radical Cystectomy for Intradiverticular Bladder Carcinoma: A Case Report.

Herniation of bladder mucosa through the bladder wall muscle layer is known as bladder diverticulum. The incidence of bladder diverticulum is 1.7. About 0.8 to 10% of the urinary bladder diverticulum develops carcinoma. Transitional cell carcinoma is the most common. Painless hematuria is the most common clinical presentation. Different imaging modalities along with cystoscopy are the key to accurate diagnosis and staging. High grade multifocal urothelial carcinoma in the bladder diverticulum is better managed by radical cystectomy and standard pelvic lymph node dissection with an ileal conduit. Here we report a case of a 66-year old gentleman of high grade multifocal urothelial carcinoma in bladder diverticulum managed with radical cystectomy and standard pelvic lymph node dissection with an ileal conduit. Such cases have been addressed adequately in the literature, but we did not find such cases from our country.

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Paediatric Population: A Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Management of paediatric stone disease is challenging as they are considered high risk group. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is minimally invasive procedure with definite advantages in terms of higher stone clearance in single session and no long term effect in renal function. METHODS: Retrospective study was done including all patients upto the age of 18 years who underwent Percutaneous nephrolithotomy from January 2010 to December 2018 in our center after taking approval from ethical committee. Data was collected regarding gender, operative side, operative time duration, hospital stay, post-operative decrease in hemoglobin, stone size, Guy's stone score and early post-operative complications with Clavien-Dindo grade. RESULTS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was done in 48 renal units in 44 patients. 28 patients were boys and 16 were girls with mean age of 10.91 ± 5.22 years and mean stone size 17.16 ± 6.43 mm. 91.6% of cases had Guy's stone score of 1 and 2. Standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy was done in 21 renal units, mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 24 renal units and supermini percutaneous nephrolithotomy was done in three renal units with total stone free rate of 93.4%. Three patients required extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for significant residual stone. Average post-operative hemoglobin drop was 1.2 gm%. Overall complications rate was 18.1% with 4.5% of complications being grade 1 and 2 whereas 13.6% were Grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is safe and feasible in paediatric patients with large stone burden, complex anatomy or shock-wave lithotripsy failure with acceptable complication and stone free rate.

Impact of Miniaturization on Early Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy has become the standard procedure for large renal stones but still remains highly challenging due to complications such as bleeding and sepsis, even though it has high stone free rate (SFR). We report the early outcomes of more than 1000 percutaneous nephrolithotomys done in our center. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy from January 2010 to December 2017 in single institution was conducted. All cases were stratified into three groups based on tract size; standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tract size ? 22 F, mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tract size 15 - 20 F and ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tract size ? 14 F. Age, gender, stone complexity using Guy's stone score, stone size, operative time, hemoglobin drop, hospital stay, early major and minor complications were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 1074 patients had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy among which, 578 patients were standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy, 433 mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 63 had undergone ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy. There was even distribution of patients with Guy's stone score 1 and 2 in all three groups. However, majority of patients with Guy's stone score 3 underwent standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy or mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and no patients with Guy's stone score 4 underwent ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Age group, gender and operative time were comparable between the groups; however, significant difference was noted in terms of less hemoglobin drop and shorter hospital stay (p-value < 0.05) in the miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. Complications were found to be fewer in mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy group in comparison to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Miniaturization of tract size significantly decreases post-operative complication rates, blood loss and hospital stay while maintaining high stone free rates in well selected patients undergoing Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Simultaneous Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy in one tertiary hospital in Nepal. METHODS: Retrospective study was done for all patients that underwent bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy in our center from January 2010 to December 2017. The study included 36 male and 16 female patients with totalof 104renal units at an average age of 37 years (range 3 -65 years). Five patients were planned for bilateral simultaneous Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, but intraoperatively the procedure was aborted after completion of only one side due to various factors. All PCNL were performed in prone position under general anesthesia. RESULTS: In91.2% of the patients, bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy could be performed as planned. Average time required for bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy was 94 ± 38.8mins (range 25 - 170 mins) with average hemoglobin drop of 1.85 ± 1.30gm% (range 0.1 - 4.2gm%) and no significant change in serum creatinine levels. Multiple access tracts (>1) had to be created in 3 renal units. Most of the renal stones were Guy's stone score (GSS) 1 and 2 whereas 15.4% were GSS of 3 and 4.Overall stone free rate was 94% with significant residual stones (>4mm) in 6 renal units which were subjected to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) on a later date (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-a). Bladder clot evacuation was done in one patient (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-b). Blood transfusion was required in two patients and two patients developed postoperative sepsis (Clavien-Dindo Grade: II). One patient developed hydrothorax which was managed successfully (Clavien-Dindo Grade: III-a). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral simultaneous Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is feasible and safe procedure, given that the patients are appropriately selected based upon Guy's stone score, stone burden, pelvi-calyceal anatomy and overall health status.