Organ Utilization Rates from Non-Ideal Donors for Solid Organ Transplant in the United States.

Background: Non-ideal donors provide acceptable allografts and may expand the donor pool. This study evaluates donor utilization across solid organs over 15-years in the United States. Methods: We analyzed the OPTN STAR database to identify potential donors across three donor eras: 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019. Donors were analyzed by a composite Donor Utilization Score (DUS), comprised of donor age and comorbidities. Outcomes of interest were overall and organ-specific donor utilization. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression modeling were performed. p-values < 0.01 considered significant. Results: Of 132,465 donors, 32,710 (24.7%) were identified as non-ideal donors (NID), based on a DUS ≥ 3. Compared to ideal donors (ID), NID were older (median 56 years, IQR 51-64 years vs. 35 years, 22-48 years, p < 0.001) and more frequently female (44.3% vs. 39.1%, p < 0.001), Black (22.1% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001) and obese (60.7% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.001). The likelihood of overall DBD utilization from NID increased from Era 1 to Era 2 (OR 1.227, 95% CI 1.123-1.341, p < 0.001) and Era 3 (OR 1.504, 1.376-1.643, p < 0.001), while DCD donor utilization in NID was not statistically different across Eras. Compared to Era 1, the likelihood of DBD utilization from NID for kidney transplantation was lower in Era 2 (OR 0.882, 0.822-0.946) and Era 3 (OR 0.938, 0.876-1.004, p = 0.002). The likelihood of NID utilization increased in Era 3 compared to Era 1 for livers (OR 1.511, 1.411-1.618, p < 0.001), hearts (OR 1.623, 1.415-1.862, p < 0.001), and lungs (OR 2.251, 2.011-2.520, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Using a universal definition of NID across organs, NID donor utilization is increasing; however, use of DUS may improve resource utilization in identifying donors at highest likelihood for multi-organ donation.

Implications of drug intoxication on donor utilization and outcomes in liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the implications of drug intoxication (DI) on donor utilization and outcomes in liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: The UNOS STAR database was evaluated for all potential donors and adult, first-time, whole LT between 2005 and 2019. Logistic regression analyses evaluated liver utilization; proportional hazards modeling assessed risk of 1-year graft loss. RESULTS: A total of 132 783 potential donors (10 205, 7.7% from DI), and 90 612 adult LT were identified (7490, 8.3% from DI). DI donors had median age 32 years (IQR 26-40 years, p < .001), were 42.6% female (n = 4346), and 15.5% were DCD donors (n = 1583). Utilization of DI donors changed over time, such that by 2015-2019 they were the most likely donor cause of death (COD) to be utilized. Among LT recipients, there were insignificant differences (<2% variance) in age, gender, ethnicity, and etiology of liver disease according to donor COD. Recipients with MELD scores >30 more frequently received grafts from donors with trauma (23.8%) and DI (21.8%) versus cardiovascular (20.0%) and CVA/stroke (19.9%, p < .001). Among DBD donors, DI-COD was associated with superior 1-year graft survival compared to donors from trauma (HR 1.172, 95% CI 1.057-1.300) and CVA/stroke (HR 1.404, 95% CI 1.264-1.561, p < .001). Donor COD was not significantly associated with 1-year graft loss among DCD donors. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased likelihood of donor utilization when COD is drug overdose and an increased likelihood of 1-year graft survival compared to donors from trauma, CVA/stroke, and other COD.

Incidence and Outcomes of Simultaneous Thoracoabdominal Triple Organ Transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate patient outcomes of simultaneous triple organ transplants, which may provide insight into optimal donor allocation while maximizing recipient benefit. METHODS: Triple organ transplants and their corollary dual organ transplants were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Triple organ transplants evaluated included heart-lung-kidney (n = 12) and heart-liver-kidney (n = 37). Heart-lung-kidney recipients were compared with heart-lung (n = 325), lung-kidney (n = 91), and heart-kidney (n = 2022) groups. Heart-liver-kidney recipients were compared with heart-liver (n = 451), liver-kidney (n = 10422), and heart-kidney (n = 2517) recipients. Patient survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Patients undergoing triple organ transplants showed similar 10-year survival as their corresponding dual organ transplant cohorts. Patient survival estimate at 10 years for the heart-lung-kidney group was 45%, with no statistically significant difference in survival when compared with dual organ groups (P = .16). Survival estimates at 10 years for the heart-liver-kidney group was 49%, with no statistically significant difference in survival when compared with dual organ groups (P = .06). CONCLUSION: Despite the surgical burden of adding a third organ transplant, heart-liver-kidney and heart-lung-kidney have similar survival outcomes to dual organ equivalents and represent a reasonable allocation option in well-selected patients.

Serum Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone and Incidence and Progression of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Results From the REDUCE Study.

PURPOSE: Though the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia is unclear, it was previously believed that increasing androgen levels contributed, though not all data support this idea. We tested if elevated serum testosterone or dihydrotestosterone were risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms incidence in asymptomatic men and for lower urinary tract symptoms progression in symptomatic men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A post hoc analysis of REDUCE was performed in 3009 asymptomatic men and in 2145 symptomatic men. REDUCE was a randomized trial of dutasteride for prostate cancer prevention in men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen and negative prestudy biopsy. We estimated multivariable adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using Cox models to test the association between quintiles of serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone at baseline and lower urinary tract symptoms incidence and progression and tested for interaction by treatment arm (dutasteride vs placebo). RESULTS: In asymptomatic men, there was no evidence serum testosterone or dihydrotestosterone were related to lower urinary tract symptoms incidence (P = .9, P = .4). In symptomatic men, there was no evidence serum testosterone or dihydrotestosterone were related to lower urinary tract symptoms progression (P = .9, P = .7). Results were similar in both placebo and dutasteride arms (all P interaction ≥ .3). CONCLUSIONS: In REDUCE, higher serum testosterone and higher serum dihydrotestosterone were not associated with either lower urinary tract symptoms incidence in asymptomatic men or lower urinary tract symptoms progression in symptomatic men. These data do not support the hypothesis that serum androgens in middle-aged men are associated with lower urinary tract symptoms.

Drug Overdose and Cardiovascular Deaths Among Deceased Organ Donors: Implications for Donor Utilization and Data Reporting.

BACKGROUND The present study evaluated expanded cause of death (COD) definitions and its implications on donor utilization for solid organ transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS The OPTN Standard Transplant and Research file was queried for potential donors between 2005 and 2019. Donor- and organ-specific utilization were evaluated. Expanded donor COD were identified: trauma, cardiovascular (CV), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or stroke, drug intoxication (DI), anoxia not otherwise specified (NOS), and other. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression analyses for donor utilization were performed. RESULTS Among 132 783 potential donors identified, the most common COD was CVA/Stroke (n=44 707, 33.7%), followed by trauma (n=43 356, 32.7%), CV (n=20 053, 15.1%), anoxia-NOS (n=12 261, 9.2%), DI (n=10 205, 7.7%), and other causes (n=2201, 1.7%). Significant differences between CV, DI, and anoxia-NOS groups existed for donor age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, and comorbidities. Donors from trauma had the highest unadjusted utilization rate (97.2%) while CV donors had the lowest (90.1%). Multivariable analysis of brain-dead donors (DBD) showed that compared to trauma, donors from DI had higher likelihood of utilization (odds ratio 1.217, 95% 1.025-1.446) while CV donors were lower (OR 0.717, 95% CI 0.642-0.800, P<0.001). Among donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, there was decreased utilization compared to trauma for both CV (OR 0.607, 95% CI 0.523-0.705) and DI (OR 0.754, 95% CI 0.603-0.914, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Current COD definitions should be expanded to capture significant differences in the donor population. DI donors are the fastest growing cohort and the most likely utilized DBD donors, while trauma donors remain the most likely utilized DCD donors.