Surgical Approach Does Not Influence Instability Risk in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although the direct anterior (DA) approach has increased in popularity for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is limited evidence regarding its use for revision THA. It is unknown whether the dislocation benefit seen in the primary setting translates to revision cases. METHODS: This retrospective review compared the dislocation rates of revision THA performed through DA versus postero-lateral (PL) approaches at a single institution (2011 to 2021). Exclusion criteria included revision for instability, ≥ 2 prior revisions, approaches other than DA or PL, and placement of dual-mobility or constrained liners. There were 182 hips in 173 patients that met inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 2 to 8 years). RESULTS: There was a trend towards more both-component revisions being performed through the PL approach. There were no differences in dislocation rates between the DA revision and PL revision cohorts, which were 8.1% (5 of 72) and 7.5% (9 of 120), respectively (P = 0.999). Dislocation trended lower when the revision approach was discordant from the primary approach compared to cases where primary and revision had a concordant approach (4.9 versus 8.5%), but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.740). No significant differences were found in return to operating room (OR), 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, or 90-day readmissions. However, the length of stay was significantly shorter in patients who had DA revisions after a primary PL procedure (P = 0.021). CONCLUSION: Dislocation rates following revision THA did not differ between the DA and PL approaches irrespective of the primary approach. Surgeons should choose their revision approach based on their experience and the specific needs of the patient.

Intraoperative Surgeon-Administered Adductor Canal Block Is a Safe Alternative to Preoperative Anesthesiologist-Administered Adductor Canal Block in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The shift toward outpatient total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) has led to a demand for effective perioperative pain control methods. A surgeon-performed "low" adductor canal block ("low-ACB") technique, involving an intraoperative ACB, is gaining popularity due to its efficiency and early pain control potential. This study examined the transition from traditional preoperative anesthesiologist-performed ultrasound-guided adductor canal blocks ("high-ACB") to low-ACB, evaluating pain control, morphine consumption, first physical therapy visit gait distance, hospital length-of-stay, and complications. METHODS: There were 2,620 patients at a single institution who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, and received either a low-ACB or high-ACB. Cohorts included 1,248 patients and 1,372 patients in the low-ACB and high-ACB groups, respectively. Demographics and operative times were similar. Patient characteristics and outcomes such as morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), Visual Analog Scale pain scores, gait distance (feet), length of stay (days), and postoperative complications (30-day readmission and 30-day emergency department visit) were collected. RESULTS: The low-ACB cohort had higher pain scores over the first 24 hours (5.05 versus 4.86, P < .001) and higher MME at 6 hours (11.49 versus 8.99, P < .001), although this was not clinically significant. There was no difference in pain scores or MME at 12 or 24 hours (20.81 versus 22.07 and 44.67 versus 48.78, respectively). The low-ACB cohort showed longer gait distance at the first physical therapy visit (188.5 versus 165.1 feet, P < .001) and a shorter length of stay (0.88 versus 1.46 days, P < .01), but these were not clinically significant. There were no differences in 30-day complications. CONCLUSIONS: The low-ACB offers effective pain relief and comparable early recovery without increasing operative time or the complication rate. Low-ACB is an effective, safe, and economical alternative to high-ACB. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III (retrospective cohort study).

Femoral Neck Fracture in a Pediatric Patient with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

Case: A previously healthy 11-year-old girl underwent expedited surgical fixation of a femoral neck fracture sustained while jump-roping. After further work up, she was diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism. Parathyroidectomy of a hypertrophic adenoma proved curative. Now, five months post left hip surgery, the patient is pain-free and walks without a limp. Conclusion: We describe the first published case of primary hyperparathyroidism presenting as a pathologic hip fracture in a child. Although presentation with a fracture is exceedingly rare, bone pain is a frequent complaint of pediatric hyperparathyroidism. Orthopedic surgeons may find themselves the front-line caregivers for the condition.

A Reduction in Body Mass Index From ≥ 40 to < 40 Lowers Emergency Department Visits, but May Increase All-Cause Readmissions After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Conflicting 90-Day Outcomes at a Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons tasked a 2013 workgroup to provide obesity-related recommendations in total joint arthroplasty. Morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40) seeking hip arthroplasty were determined to be at increased perioperative risk, and surgeons were recommended to encourage these patients to reduce their BMI <40 presurgery. We report the effect of instituting a 2014 BMI <40 threshold on our primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs). METHODS: We queried our institutional database to select all primary THAs from January 2010 to May 2020. There were 1,383 THAs that were pre-2014 and 3,273 THAs that were post-2014. The 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and returns to operating room (OR) were identified. Patients were propensity score weight-matched according to comorbidities, age, initial surgical consultation (consult) BMI, and sex. We conducted 3 comparisons: A) pre-2014 patients who had a consult and surgical BMI ≥40 against post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥40 and surgical BMI <40; B) pre-2014 patients against post-2014 patients who had a consult and surgical BMI <40; and C) post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥40 and surgical BMI <40 against post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥40 and surgical BMI ≥40. RESULTS: Post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥ 40 and surgical BMI <40 had less ED visits (7.6 versus 14.1%, P = .0007), but similar readmissions (11.9 versus 6.3%, P = .22) and returns to OR (5.4 versus 1.6%, P = .09) compared to pre-2014 patients who had a consult BMI and surgical BMI ≥ 40. Post-2014 BMI <40 had less readmissions (5.9 versus 9.3%, P < .0001), and similar all-cause returns to OR and ED visits than patients pre-2014. Post-2014 patients who had a consult and surgical BMI ≥ 40 had lower readmissions (12.5 versus 12.8%, P = .05), and similar ED visits and returns to OR than consult BMI ≥ 40 and surgical BMI <40. CONCLUSION: Patient optimization prior to total joint arthroplasty is critical. However, the BMI optimization that mitigates risk in primary total knee arthroplasty may not apply to primary THA. We observed a paradoxical increased readmission rate for patients who reduced their BMI before THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Institutional Adherence to the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Body Mass Index Guidelines Lowers Perioperative Emergency Department Visits in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons tasked a workgroup to provide obesity-related recommendations in total joint arthroplasty and determined that patients who had body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 seeking hip/knee arthroplasty were at increased perioperative risk and recommended preoperative weight reduction. Few studies have shown the actual results of instituting this; therefore, we reported the effect of instituting a BMI < 40 threshold in 2014 on our elective, primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). METHODS: We queried an institutional database to select all TKAs conducted from January 2010 to May 2020. There were 2,514 TKA pre-2014 and 5,545 TKA post-2014 that were identified. The 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and returns-to-operating room (OR) outcomes were identified. Patients were propensity score weight-matched as per comorbidities, age, initial surgical consultation (consult) BMI, and sex. We conducted 3 outcome comparisons: (1) pre-2014 patients who had a consult and surgical BMI ≥ 40 against post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥ 40 and surgical BMI < 40; (2) pre-2014 patients against post-2014 patients who had a consult and surgical BMI < 40; (3) post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥ 40 and surgical BMI < 40 against post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥ 40 and surgical BMI ≥ 40. RESULTS: Pre-2014 patients who had a consult and surgical BMI ≥ 40 had more ED visits (12.5% versus 6%, P = .002) but similar readmissions and returns-to-OR than post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥ 40 and surgical BMI < 40. Pre-2014 patients who had a consult and surgical BMI < 40 had more readmissions (8.8% versus 6%, P < .0001) but similar ED visits and returns-to-OR when compared to their post-2014 counterparts. Post-2014 patients who had a consult BMI ≥ 40 and surgical BMI < 40 had fewer ED visits (5.8% versus 10.6%) but similar readmissions and returns-to-OR than patients who had a consult BMI ≥ 40 and surgical BMI ≥ 40. DISCUSSION: Patient optimization prior to total joint arthroplasty is essential. Enacting BMI reduction pathways prior to total knee arthroplasty seems to afford morbidly obese patients major risk mitigation. We must continue to ethically balance the pathology, expected improvement after surgery, and the overall risks of complications for each patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

High Rate of Intramedullary Canal Culture Positivity in Total Knee Arthroplasty Resection for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic infection is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty. A 2-stage protocol often includes an interim antibiotic spacer with intramedullary (IM) dowels. However, the necessity of IM dowels has recently been challenged. Specifically, the data supporting bacterial colonization of the IM canal are limited and controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the rate of positive IM cultures during resection arthroplasty in periprosthetic knee infection. METHODS: A total of 66 IM diaphyseal cultures were taken during resection arthroplasty from 34 patients diagnosed with periprosthetic knee infection. These IM cultures were taken from the femoral and tibial canals using separate sterile instruments. All patients had infected primary total knee arthroplasty implants at the time of resection. RESULTS: Thirty one percent (n = 21) of IM canal cultures in this study were positive from either the tibial or the femoral diaphysis at the time of resection arthroplasty. There were 18 of 21 (86%) of the positive IM canal cultures with concordant intraoperative joint cultures where the IM cultures matched the intraarticular cultures. CONCLUSION: With a 31% positive IM canal culture rate, this study confirms the logic of using IM dowels with an antibiotic spacer to treat periprosthetic knee infection. Since the failure of a 2-stage reimplantation is catastrophic, any attempt to provide additional local antibiotic delivery seems warranted. Since nearly one-third of our patients had positive IM cultures, this simple addition to an antibiotic spacer has the potential to improve 2-stage results. Claims supporting the elimination of IM dowels during resection arthroplasty seem ill-advised.

The Role of Dual-Mobility Components in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

➤: Dual mobility (DM) refers to a now widely available option for total hip articulation. DM implants feature a small inner head, a hard bearing, that connects via a taper fit onto the femoral trunnion. This head freely rotates but is encased inside a larger, outer polyethylene head that articulates with a smooth acetabular component. ➤: DM acetabular components are available in the form of a monoblock shell or as a liner that is impacted into a modular shell, providing a metal articulation for the polyethylene outer head. ➤: DM is designed to increase hip stability by providing the arthroplasty construct with a higher jump distance, head-to-neck ratio, and range of motion prior to impingement. ➤: The use of DM in total hip arthroplasty continues to increase in the United States for both primary and revision arthroplasty. Surgeons should be aware of the potential benefits and pitfalls. ➤: Long-term data are lacking, especially for modular DM implants. Points of concern include a potential for accelerated polyethylene wear, intraprosthetic dislocation, and modular backside fretting corrosion.

Has the time come for regional periprosthetic joint infection centers in the United States? A first-year experience.

Several fields of orthopedics have concluded benefits from volume thresholds. We postulate that we could similarly optimize periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment by creating a regional referral center, concentrating expertise and resources. Here, we review our reasoning and our first-year experience of a PJI referral center in the United States.

A Simple Physical Therapy Algorithm Is Successful in Decreasing Skilled Nursing Facility Length of Stay and Increasing Cost Savings After Hip Fracture With No Increase in Adverse Events.

INTRODUCTION: Shorter length of stays (LOS) at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) after hip fracture surgery would be expected to lead to costs savings for the healthcare system. Evidence also suggests that shorter SNF stays also leads to improved 30-day outcomes, thus compounding this value proposition. Our Integrated Fragility Hip Fracture Program created a simple algorithm at discharge to provide each post-operative hip fracture patient with an expected SNF LOS. We studied whether this intervention produced a shorter SNF LOS and other observable short-term outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all original Medicare hip fracture patients treated with operative fixation who were admitted to our hospital in 2015, 2017 and 2018. We selected patients who were discharged to a single SNF following hospitalization, and excluded patients with incomplete records. The algorithm for the expected LOS recommendation was based on the degree of assistance the patient needed for ambulation: 7 days ("0-person assist"), 14 days ("1-person assist"), or 21 days ("2-person assist"). We compare the SNF LOS of our hip fracture patient population between those discharged to a program participant, those SNF that agreed to this algorithm, and those discharged to a non-program participant SNF. RESULTS: We identified 246 patients meeting our selection criteria. 69 were discharged to a program participant SNF. Patients discharged to a participant SNF had similar baseline demographics and ASA distributions to those discharged to a non-participant provider. There was a statistically significant difference in length of stay between the groups, with program participant patients spending an average of 23 days at the SNF while the control group spent an average of 31 days. (p < 0.001). Program participant discharges were also associated with additional cost savings. There was no significant difference in ED visits within 90 days of discharge. DISCUSSION: SNF LOS for geriatric hip fractures can be decreased with implementation of a simple physical therapy driven algorithm based on the patient's ambulatory independence at hospital discharge. Conclusion: This is a simple, yet completely unique program that seems to have increased the value of healthcare provided.

Patient Factors and Perioperative Outcomes Affect Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey Response Rates After Primary Total Hip Replacement.

INTRODUCTION: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey is a federally mandated survey that assesses patient satisfaction after hospitalization. It has been noted that a minority of patients actually return the survey. Potential bias in who does and does not respond to the survey (nonresponse bias) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may affect the survey results. METHODS: All adult patients undergoing inpatient elective primary THA between February 2013 and May 2020 at a single institution were selected for retrospective analysis. After discharge, all had been mailed the HCAHPS survey, and the primary outcome for the current study was survey return. Patient characteristics and 30-day perioperative outcomes were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine correlations between the above variables and HCAHPS survey return status. RESULTS: Of 3,310 THA patients analyzed, 1,049 (31.69%) returned the HCAHPS surveys. On multivariate regression analyses, patients who did not return the survey were more likely to have a higher American Society of Anesthesia score (score of three or higher, odds ratio [OR] = 2.27; P < 0.001), be more functionally dependent (OR = 2.69; P = 0.005), or be Black/African American (OR = 3.40; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients who did not return the survey were more likely to have had any adverse event (OR = 1.80; P = 0.012), major adverse event (OR = 2.88; P = 0.007), readmission (OR = 2.13; P < 0.001), be discharged to a place other than home (OR = 1.71; P < 0.001), or stay in the hospital for longer than 3 days (OR = 1.89; P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: After THA, the HCAHPS survey response rate was only 31.69% and completion of the survey correlated with demographic and perioperative variables. These findings suggest that the HCAHPS survey results should be interpreted as a skewed sample of the true surgical patient population. Nonresponse bias is an important factor to consider when evaluating healthcare quality, patient satisfaction survey results, and their effects on federal hospital reimbursement rates.

Cement Augmentation of Vertebral Compression Fractures May Be Safely Considered in the Very Elderly.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to perform a retrospective review of a national database to assess the safety of cement augmentation for vertebral compression fractures in geriatric populations in varying age categories. METHODS: The 2005-2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases were queried to identify patients undergoing kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty in the following age categories: 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and 90+ years old. Demographic variables, comorbidity status, procedure type, provider specialty, inpatient/outpatient status, number of procedure levels, and periprocedure complications were compared between age categories using chi-square analysis. Multivariate logistic regressions controlling for patient and procedural variables were then performed to assess the relative periprocedure risks of adverse outcomes of patients in the different age categories relative to those who were 60-69 years old. RESULTS: For the 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and 90+ years old cohorts, 486, 822, 937, and 215 patients were identified, respectively. After controlling for patient and procedural variables, 30-day any adverse events, serious adverse events, reoperation, readmission, and mortality were not different for the respective age categories. Cases in the 80- to 89-year-old cohort were at increased risk of minor adverse events compared to cases in the 60- to 69-year-old cohort. CONCLUSION: As the population ages, cement augmentation is being considered as a treatment for vertebral compression fractures in increasingly older patients. These results suggest that even the very elderly may be appropriately considered for these procedures (level of evidence: 3).

Two-stage Treatment for Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Infections.

Two-stage exchange remains the standard of care for treatment of chronic periprosthetic infections in the United States. The strategy involves three steps; a resection arthroplasty with a thorough debridement and placement of a temporary spacer, an extended period of targeted antibiotics, and finally, a second definitive reconstruction procedure. The lengthy period of time between surgeries, where patients have diminished mobility, a long period of IV antibiotics and its considerable side effects, and the need for two large operations and hospitalizations places physiologic and emotional demands on patients and their families. A two-stage exchange has considerable morbidity and mortality, with significant attrition between stages. Nonetheless, it remains the gold standard for treatment of chronic periprosthetic infections, with good historic success rates. In this review, we outline its historical origins, surgical technique, outcomes and current research shaping two-stage exchanges. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(4):220-225, 2021).

High, As Well As Low, Preoperative Platelet Counts Correlate With Adverse Outcomes After Elective Posterior Lumbar Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Assess correlation between preoperative platelet counts and postoperative adverse events after elective posterior lumbar surgery procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative low platelet counts have been correlated with adverse outcomes after posterior lumbar surgery. Nonetheless, the effect of varying platelet counts has not been studied in detail for a large patient population, especially on the high end of the platelet spectrum. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective posterior lumbar surgery were identified in the 2011 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Preoperative platelet counts were considered relative to 30-day perioperative adverse outcomes. Patients were classified into platelet categories based on determining upper and lower bounds on when the adverse outcomes crossed a relative risk of 1.5. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared 30-day postoperative complications, readmissions, operative time, and hospital length of stay between those with low, normal, and high platelet counts. RESULTS: In total, 137,709 posterior lumbar surgery patients were identified. Using the relative risk threshold of 1.5 for the occurrence of any adverse event, patients were divided into abnormally low (≤140,000/mL) and abnormally high (≥447,000/mL) platelet cohorts. The abnormally low and high platelet groups were associated with higher rates of any, major, minor adverse events, transfusion, and longer hospital length of stay. Furthermore, the abnormally low platelet counts were associated with a higher risk of readmissions. CONCLUSION: The data-based cut-offs for abnormally high and low platelet counts closely mirrored those found in literature. Based on these definitions, abnormally high and low preoperative platelet counts were associated with adverse outcomes after elective posterior lumbar surgery. These findings facilitate risk stratification and suggest targeted consideration for patients with high, as well as low, preoperative platelet counts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Characteristics and Predictors of HCAHPS Nonresponse After Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess nonresponder biases for the HCAHPS survey following spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey is a publicly reported patient satisfaction survey. In addition to having the potential of impacting a hospital's reputation, it is directly linked to government reimbursement. However, it is known that a minority of patients return this survey, and it is expected that there are nonresponder biases. METHODS: All adult inpatient spine surgery patients at a single institution between January 2013 and August 2017 at a single institution were selected for retrospective analysis. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes were assessed as potential predictors of not returning HCAHPS surveys. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 5517 spine surgeries analyzed, 1505 (27.3%) patients returned the HCAHPS survey. Response rate was variable based on patient characteristics (with statistically significant differences based on age, functional status, race, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score) but not variable based on anatomic region of the spine surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients who did not return the HCAHPS survey were more likely to be black/African American (OR = 2.8, P < 0.001), have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR 1.76, P < 0.001), and have had a major adverse event (OR = 1.66; P = 0.001), minor adverse event (OR = 2.50; P < 0.001), discharged to a destination other than home (OR = 2.16, P < 0.001), hospital readmission (OR = 2.58; P < 0.001), and a long hospital length of stay (OR = 1.28, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: For spine surgery patients, patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were found to be significantly associated with the nonresponder bias for HCAHPS surveys. Although the potential resultant bias in HCAHPS scores cannot be directly determined, this must be considered in interpreting the results of such satisfaction surveys given that less than one-third of patients actually completed this survey in the study population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Postoperative Pressure Ulcers After Geriatric Hip Fracture Surgery Are Predicted by Defined Preoperative Comorbidities and Postoperative Complications.

INTRODUCTION: The current study sought to determine the factors predictive of postoperative pressure ulcer development by analyzing extensive multicenter outcomes data from the 2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. METHODS: The 2016 NSQIP Participant Use File and Hip Fracture Procedure Targeted file were used to identify the risk factors for the development of postoperative pressure ulcers after hip fracture surgery in a geriatric cohort. Multivariate regressions were performed to identify preoperative comorbidities and postoperative complications that are risk factors for developing postoperative pressure ulcers. RESULTS: Of 8,871 geriatric hip fracture patients included in the study cohort, 457 (5.15%) developed pressure ulcers. Multivariate regressions identified the following preoperative risk factors for developing a postoperative pressure ulcer (in order of decreasing relative risk): preoperative sepsis, elevated platelet count, insulin-dependent diabetes, and preexisting pressure ulcer. Multivariate regressions also identified the following postoperative complications as risk factors for developing a postoperative pressure ulcer: postoperative sepsis, postoperative pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and postoperative delirium. DISCUSSION: The identified preoperative factors and postoperative complications should help guide quality improvement programs.

Admission NarxCare Narcotics Scores are not Associated With Adverse Surgical Outcomes or Self-reported Patient Satisfaction Following Elective Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to investigate how elective spine surgery patient preoperative opioid use (as determined by admission NarxCare narcotics use scores) correlated with 30-day perioperative outcomes and postoperative patient satisfaction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effect of preoperative narcotics usage on postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction following spine surgery has been of question. The NarxCare platform analyzes the patients' state Physician Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) records to assign numerical scores that approximate a patient's overall opioid drug usage. METHODS: Elective spine surgery cases performed at a single institution between October 2017 and March 2018 were evaluated. NarxCare narcotics use scores at the time of admission were assessed. Patient characteristics, as well as 30-day adverse events, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality, were abstracted from the medical record. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey data were also abstracted when available.Cases were binned based on the following ranges of admission NarxCare scores: 0, 1 to 99, 100 to 299, 300 to 499, and 500+. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to compare the odds of having an adverse events, readmission, reoperation, and mortality between the different narcotics groups. One-way analysis of variance analyses were performed to compare HCAHPS survey response rates and HCAHPS survey results between the different narcotics score groups. RESULTS: In total, 346 patients met criteria for inclusion in the study (NarxScore 0: n = 74, 1-99: n = 58, 300-499: n = 117, and 500+: n = 21). Multivariate logistic regressions did not detect statistically significant differential odds of experiencing adverse events, readmission, reoperation, or mortality between the different groups of admissions narcotics scores. Analyses of variance did not detect statistically significant differences in HCAHPS survey response rates, total HCAHPS scores, or HCAHP subgroup scores between the different narcotics score groups. CONCLUSION: Although there are many reasons to address preoperative patient narcotic utilization, the present study did not detect perioperative outcome differences or patient satisfaction based on the narcotic use scores as stratified here. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Unlike Native Hip Fractures, Delay to Periprosthetic Hip Fracture Stabilization Does Not Significantly Affect Most Short-Term Perioperative Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of periprosthetic hip fractures is increasing due to higher numbers of total hip arthroplasties being performed. Unlike native hip fractures, the effect of time to surgery of periprosthetic hip fractures is not well established. This study evaluates the effect of time to surgery on perioperative complications for patients with periprosthetic hip fractures. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for periprosthetic hip fracture were identified in the 2005-2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and stratified into 2 groups: <2 and ≥2 days from hospital admission to surgery. Multivariate regressions were used to compare risk for perioperative complications between the 2 groups. Independent risk factors for postoperative serious adverse events were characterized. RESULTS: In total, 409 (<2 days from admission to surgery) and 272 (≥2 days from admission to surgery) patients were identified. Multivariate analysis revealed only higher risk of extended postoperative stay for patients who had delays of ≥2 days to surgery compared to those who had <2 days from admission to surgery. Independent risk factors for serious adverse events included increasing age, dependent preoperative functional status, and preoperative congestive heart failure, but not time to surgery. CONCLUSION: Unlike for native hip fractures, time to surgery for periprosthetic hip fractures does not appear to affect most 30-day perioperative complications. However, it is worth noting that this study was unable to control for all potential confounders and therefore the results may not be generalizable to all types of periprosthetic hip fractures.

Lyme periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty.

Lyme arthritis, caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, is a common tick-borne illness in New England and the upper Midwest. Most often, the disease affects the knee and has typically been reported as a cause of native joint infection. There has been only 1 case of Lyme periprosthetic joint infection (associated with a total knee arthroplasty) reported in the literature, and to our knowledge, no other reported cases of Lyme periprosthetic joint infections exist. In this article, we report on 2 patients diagnosed with prosthetic joint infections who were subsequently found to have Lyme prosthetic joint infections, with B burgdorferi as the infectious organism. We discuss the medical and surgical management of these patients.

Late total hip arthroplasty dislocation due to yoga.

Yoga has become a popular form of exercise, recreation, and meditation for adults in the United States. As the popularity of both yoga and the incidence of hip replacements have both coincidentally increased over the last 2 decades, we imagine that the number of total hip replacement patients partaking in the practice of yoga has also increased. There are no clear guidelines available for yoga practice following hip replacement. To date, there have been no published reports of prosthetic hip dislocations during yoga. We present 2 cases of late total hip dislocations during yoga and provide a review of the available orthopaedic literature and our recommendations on patient restrictions and education with respect to practicing yoga after a hip replacement.

Early Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis After Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism is a common complication of traumatic brain injury with an estimated incidence of 25% when chemoprophylaxis is delayed. The timing of initiating prophylaxis is controversial given the concern for hemorrhage expansion. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of initiating venous thromboembolic event (VTE) chemoprophylaxis within 24 h of presentation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage presenting to a level I trauma center. Patients receiving early chemoprophylaxis (<24 h) were compared to the matched cohort of patients who received heparin in a delayed fashion (>48 h). The primary outcome of the study was radiographic expansion of the intracranial hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes included VTE, use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, delayed decompressive surgery, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 282 patients, 94 (33%) received chemoprophylaxis within 24 h of admission. The cohorts were evenly matched across all variables. The primary outcome occurred in 18% of patients in the early cohort compared to 17% in the delayed cohort (P = .83). Fifteen patients (16%) in the early cohort underwent an invasive procedure in a delayed fashion; this compares to 35 patients (19%) in the delayed cohort (P = .38). Five patients (1.7%) in our study had a VTE during their hospitalization; 2 of these patients received early chemoprophylaxis (P = .75). The rate of mortality from all causes was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Early (<24 h) initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage appears to be safe. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this finding.