Impact of long-term storage of plasma and cell-free DNA on measured DNA quantity and fetal fraction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal sample storage conditions are essential for non-invasive prenatal testing of cell-free fetal and total DNA. We investigated the effect of long-term storage of plasma samples and extracted cfDNA using qPCR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fetal and total cfDNA yield and fetal fraction were calculated before and after storage of plasma for 0-6 years at -25°C. Dilution experiments were performed to investigate PCR inhibition. Extraction with or without proteinase K was used to examine protein dissociation. Storage of extracted cfDNA was investigated by testing aliquots immediately, and after 18 months and 3 years of storage at -25°C. RESULTS: We observed a marked increase in the levels of amplifiable fetal and total DNA in plasma stored for 2-3 years, and fetal fraction was slightly decreased after 3 years of storage. cfDNA detection was independent of proteinase K during DNA extraction in plasma samples stored >2 years, indicating a loss of proteins from DNA over time, which was likely to account for the observed increase in DNA yields. Measured fetal and total DNA quantities, as well as fetal fraction, increased in stored, extracted cfDNA. CONCLUSION: Fetal and total cell-free DNA is readily detectable in plasma after long-term storage at -25°C. However, substantial variation in measured DNA quantities and fetal fraction means caution may be required when using stored plasma and extracted cfDNA for test development or validation purposes.

Measurement of fetal fraction in cell-free DNA from maternal plasma using a panel of insertion/deletion polymorphisms.

OBJECTIVE: Cell-free DNA from maternal plasma can be used for non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidies and single gene disorders, and also has applications as a biomarker for monitoring high-risk pregnancies, such as those at risk of pre-eclampsia. On average, the fractional cell-free fetal DNA concentration in plasma is approximately 15%, but can vary from less than 4% to greater than 30%. Although quantification of cell-free fetal DNA is straightforward in the case of a male fetus, there is no universal fetal marker; in a female fetus measurement is more challenging. We have developed a panel of multiplexed insertion/deletion polymorphisms that can measure fetal fraction in all pregnancies in a simple, targeted sequencing reaction. METHODS: A multiplex panel of primers was designed for 35 indels plus a ZFX/ZFY amplicon. cfDNA was extracted from plasma from 157 pregnant women, and maternal genomic DNA was extracted for 20 of these samples for panel validation. Sixty-one samples from pregnancies with a male fetus were subjected to whole genome sequencing on the Ion Proton sequencing platform, and fetal fraction derived from Y chromosome counts was compared to fetal fraction measured using the indel panel. A total of 157 cell-free DNA samples were sequenced using the indel panel, and informativity was assessed, along with the proportion of fetal DNA. RESULTS: Using gDNA we optimised the indel panel, removing amplicons giving rise to PCR bias. Good correlation was found between fetal fraction using indels and using whole genome sequencing of the Y chromosome (Spearmans r = 0.69). A median of 12 indels were informative per sample. The indel panel was informative in 157/157 cases (mean fetal fraction 14.4% (±0.58%)). CONCLUSIONS: Using our targeted next generation sequencing panel we can readily assess the fetal DNA percentage in male and female pregnancies.

Challenges in non-invasive prenatal screening for sub-chromosomal copy number variations using cell-free DNA.

Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) has revolutionized the approach to prenatal fetal aneuploidy screening. Many commercial providers now offer analyses for sub-chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs). Here, we review the use of NIPS in the context of screening for microdeletions and microduplications, issues surrounding the choice of disorders tested for, and the advantages and disadvantages associated with the inclusion of microdeletions to current NIPS. Several studies have claimed benefits; however, we suggest that microdeletions have not demonstrated a low enough false positive rate to be deemed practical or ethically acceptable, especially considering their low positive predictive values. Because a positive NIPS result should be confirmed using diagnostic techniques, and false positive rates are as high as 90% for some microdeletions, diagnostic testing seems preferable when the goal is to maximize the detection of microdeletion or microduplication syndromes.

Preferences for prenatal tests for Down syndrome: an international comparison of the views of pregnant women and health professionals.

Non-invasive prenatal testing is increasingly available worldwide and stakeholder viewpoints are essential to guide implementation. Here we compare the preferences of women and health professionals from nine different countries towards attributes of non-invasive and invasive prenatal tests for Down syndrome. A discrete choice experiment was used to obtain participants' stated preference for prenatal tests that varied according to four attributes: accuracy, time of test, risk of miscarriage, and type of information. Pregnant women and health professionals were recruited from Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Singapore, and the United Kingdom. A total of 2666 women's and 1245 health professionals' questionnaires were included in the analysis. Differences in preferences were seen between women and health professionals within and between countries. Overall, women placed greater emphasis on test safety and comprehensive information than health professionals, who emphasised accuracy and early testing. Differences between women's and health professionals' preferences are marked between countries. Varied approaches to implementation and service delivery are therefore needed and individual countries should develop guidelines appropriate for their own social and screening contexts.