Differential toxic effects of bile acid mixtures in isolated mitochondria and physiologically relevant HepaRG cells.

Bile acids (BAs) are recognised as the causative agents of toxicity in drug-induced cholestasis (DIC). Research in isolated mitochondria and HepG2 cells have demonstrated BA-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction as a key mechanism of toxicity in DIC. However, HepG2 cells are of limited suitability for DIC studies as they do not express the necessary physiological characteristics. In this study, the mitotoxic potentials of BA mixtures were assessed in isolated mitochondria and a better-suited hepatic model, HepaRG cells. BAs induced structural alterations and a loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in isolated mitochondria however, this toxicity did not translate to HepaRG cells. There were no changes in oxygen consumption rate, MMP or ATP levels in glucose and galactose media, indicating that there was no direct mitochondrial toxicity mediated via electron transport chain dysfunction in HepaRG cells. Assessment of key biliary transporters revealed that there was a time-dependent reduction in the expression and activity of multi-drug resistance protein 2 (MRP2), which was consistent with the induction of cytotoxicity in HepaRG cells. Overall, the findings from this study have demonstrated that mitochondrial dysfunction is not a mechanism of BA-induced toxicity in HepaRG cells.

From the Cover: MechanisticInsights in Cytotoxic and Cholestatic Potential of the Endothelial Receptor Antagonists Using HepaRG Cells.

Several endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been developed for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Some of them have been related to clinical cases of hepatocellular injury (sitaxentan [SIT]) and/or cholestasis (bosentan [BOS]). We aimed to determine if ambrisentan (AMB) and macitentan (MAC), in addition to BOS and SIT, could potentially cause liver damage in man by use of human HepaRG cells. Our results showed that like BOS, MAC-induced cytotoxicity and cholestatic disorders characterized by bile canaliculi dilatation and impairment of myosin light chain kinase signaling. Macitentan also strongly inhibited taurocholic acid and carboxy-2',7'-dichlorofluorescein efflux while it had a much lower inhibitory effect on influx activity compared to BOS and SIT. Moreover, these three drugs caused decreased intracellular accumulation and parallel increased levels of total bile acids (BAs) in serum-free culture media. In addition, all drugs except AMB variably deregulated gene expression of BA transporters. In contrast, SIT was hepatotoxic without causing cholestatic damage, likely via the formation of reactive metabolites and AMB was not hepatotoxic. Together, our results show that some ERAs can be hepatotoxic and that the recently marketed MAC, structurally similar to BOS, can also cause cholestatic alterations in HepaRG cells. The absence of currently known or suspected cases of cholestasis in patients suffering from PAH treated with MAC is rationalized by the lower therapeutic doses and Cmax, and longer receptor residence time compared to BOS.

A multicenter assessment of single-cell models aligned to standard measures of cell health for prediction of acute hepatotoxicity.

Assessing the potential of a new drug to cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenge for the pharmaceutical industry. We therefore determined whether cell models currently used in safety assessment (HepG2, HepaRG, Upcyte and primary human hepatocytes in conjunction with basic but commonly used endpoints) are actually able to distinguish between novel chemical entities (NCEs) with respect to their potential to cause DILI. A panel of thirteen compounds (nine DILI implicated and four non-DILI implicated in man) were selected for our study, which was conducted, for the first time, across multiple laboratories. None of the cell models could distinguish faithfully between DILI and non-DILI compounds. Only when nominal in vitro concentrations were adjusted for in vivo exposure levels were primary human hepatocytes (PHH) found to be the most accurate cell model, closely followed by HepG2. From a practical perspective, this study revealed significant inter-laboratory variation in the response of PHH, HepG2 and Upcyte cells, but not HepaRG cells. This variation was also observed to be compound dependent. Interestingly, differences between donors (hepatocytes), clones (HepG2) and the effect of cryopreservation (HepaRG and hepatocytes) were less important than differences between the cell models per se. In summary, these results demonstrate that basic cell health endpoints will not predict hepatotoxic risk in simple hepatic cells in the absence of pharmacokinetic data and that a multicenter assessment of more sophisticated signals of molecular initiating events is required to determine whether these cells can be incorporated in early safety assessment.

Comparative Proteomic Characterization of 4 Human Liver-Derived Single Cell Culture Models Reveals Significant Variation in the Capacity for Drug Disposition, Bioactivation, and Detoxication.

In vitro preclinical models for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are usually based on cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes (cPHH) or human hepatic tumor-derived cell lines; however, it is unclear how well such cell models reflect the normal function of liver cells. The physiological, pharmacological, and toxicological phenotyping of available cell-based systems is necessary in order to decide the testing purpose for which they are fit. We have therefore undertaken a global proteomic analysis of 3 human-derived hepatic cell lines (HepG2, Upcyte, and HepaRG) in comparison with cPHH with a focus on drug metabolizing enzymes and transport proteins (DMETs), as well as Nrf2-regulated proteins. In total, 4946 proteins were identified, of which 2722 proteins were common across all cell models, including 128 DMETs. Approximately 90% reduction in expression of cytochromes P450 was observed in HepG2 and Upcyte cells, and approximately 60% in HepaRG cells relative to cPHH. Drug transporter expression was also lower compared with cPHH with the exception of MRP3 and P-gp (MDR1) which appeared to be significantly expressed in HepaRG cells. In contrast, a high proportion of Nrf2-regulated proteins were more highly expressed in the cell lines compared with cPHH. The proteomic database derived here will provide a rational basis for the context-specific selection of the most appropriate 'hepatocyte-like' cell for the evaluation of particular cellular functions associated with DILI and, at the same time, assist in the construction of a testing paradigm which takes into account the in vivo disposition of a new drug.