Adding eosinophil count to EMERALD rules predicts subarachnoid haemorrhage better in emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) clinical decision rules can provide successful results in the differential diagnosis of non-traumatic headache. AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate whether a laboratory parameter that can be added to clinical decision-making rules can better predict subarachnoid haemorrhages in patients presenting to the emergency department with headache. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study between March 2017 and March 2019. Patients over the age of 18 who admitted to the emergency department with non-traumatic, acute headache last 14 days before admission and evaluated by imaging and laboratory studies were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 867 patients were included and 141 of them had SAH. In detecting the SAH, Ottawa SAH rule sensitivity (85.1%), specificity (47.1%), positive predictive value (PPV) (23.8%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (94.2%), and for EMERALD SAH, rule sensitivity (96.4%), specificity (43.2%), PPV (24.8%) and NPV (98.4%). In the regression analysis, statistically significant result was obtained to exclude the diagnosis of SAH with the decrease in the eosinophil value (cutoff < 0.085 10^3/µL, OR: 0.011, 95% CI: 0.001-0.213, p = 0.003). When eosinophil value was added to EMERALD SAH rule, it provided a 100% of sensitivity, a 38.4% of specificity, a 24% of PPV and a 100% of NPV in detecting the SAH. CONCLUSIONS: EMERALD SAH rule plus eosinophil, which offers 100% sensitivity and NPV for predicting SAH in adult non-traumatic headaches, may be recommended as a successful and practical decision rule for clinical use according to the Ottawa and EMERALD SAH rule.

Significance of Preoperative Prone Position Computed Tomography in Free Hand Subaxial Cervical Pedicular Screwing.

OBJECTIVE: The subaxial cervical pedicle screwing technique shows powerful biomechanical properties for posterior cervical fusion. When applying a pedicle screw using the freehand technique, it is essential to analyse cervical computed tomography and plan the surgery accordingly. Normal cervical computed tomography is usually performed in the supine position, whereas during surgery, the patient lies in a prone position. This fact leads us to suppose that radiological evaluations may yield misleading results. Our study aimed to investigate whether there is any superiority between preoperative preparation on computed tomography performed in the prone position and that performed in the supine position. METHODS: This study included 17 patients (132 pedicle screws) who were recently operated on with cervical vertebral computed tomography in the prone position and 17 patients (136 pedicle screws) who were operated on by conventional cervical vertebral computed tomography as the control group. The patients in both groups were compared in terms of age, gender, pathological diagnosis, screw malposition and complications. A screw malposition evaluation was made according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding age, gender and pathological diagnosis. The screw malposition rate (from 11.1% to 6.9%, p<0.05), mean malposition distance (from 2.18 mm to 1.86 mm, p <0.05), and complications statistically significantly decreased in the prone position computed tomography group. CONCLUSION: Preoperative surgical planning by performing cervical vertebral computed tomography in the prone position reduces screw malposition and complications. Our surgical success increased with a simple modification that can be applied by all clinicians without creating additional radiation exposure or additional costs.

Paediatric High-Grade Intracranial Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma: A Case Report with 6 Years of Follow-Up without Recurrence.

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MSC) is an extremely rare tumour that constitutes only 0.015% of all central nervous system tumours. These tumours usually originate from skull base synchondrosis and are often observed in young adults during their second and third decades of life. Despite the absence of a consensus regarding adjuvant radiotherapy, radical excision remains crucial for the prognosis of MSC. CASE PRESENTATION: We herein present the case of a young male patient with intracranial MSC, a malignant tumour, for which no consensus regarding its treatment has yet been established. The patient underwent radical excision followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Histological analysis revealed a poorly differentiated tumour containing necrotic areas. Notably, no signs of recurrence had been observed after 6 years. CONCLUSION: The absence of recurrence over a long follow-up duration suggests the importance of radical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy.

The Effect of Straight or Lordotic Rods on Cervical Subaxial Alignment While Fusing C1-C2.

BACKGROUND: The C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw with rod fixation system has been used commonly in recent years. Despite the numerous reports on this technique in the literature, there are no studies regarding the effect of the angle of the rod used. We investigated the effect of rod angle on subaxial lordosis, cervical sagittal balance, and pain scores. METHODS: Clinical records and radiologic images of 58 patients who underwent procedures between 2011 and 2016 at our clinic were assessed retrospectively. We recorded clinical findings, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, angles of cervical and segmental lordosis, and the distance between the C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and the C7 posterior-superior corner. RESULTS: A total of 36 male and 22 female patients were enrolled. A negative correlation was found between the C1-C2 lordosis angle and the C2-C7 lordosis angle irrespective of surgical technique. In patients who were operated on using 30°-angled rods, there was a postoperative increase in C1-C2 lordosis degree and an improvement in C2 cervical SVA values. Postoperative month 6 VAS scores were significantly better in the patients who were operated on with angled rods compared with those who received straight rods. CONCLUSIONS: We believe this is because of the positive effect of the angled rod on sagittal balance. Nevertheless, prospective case-control studies should be conducted with larger groups of subjects. Furthermore, every patient should be evaluated considering the whole spinal sagittal balance.