Non-specialist delivered psycho-social interventions for women with perinatal depression living in rural communities: A systematic review.

Evidence from low- and middle-income countries suggests that non-specialist-delivered interventions effectively improve access to perinatal mental health care. However, there have been no systematic attempts to synthesize the evidence on effectiveness, relevance, and application of this strategy to resource-limited settings such as rural areas. The aim of this review is to synthesize the evidence about the effectiveness of non-specialist delivered interventions in improving depression and related outcomes in women with perinatal depression living in rural communities. Seven electronic databases were searched using the following search concepts: perinatal depression (e.g., puerperal depression, antenatal depression), rural areas (e.g., remote, nonmetropolitan, underserved), and non-specialist workers (e.g., lay worker, volunteer aide, informal caretaker. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. A narrative synthesis was performed as the high degree of study heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. Nine unique studies were eligible for inclusion. Psychoeducation and problem-solving techniques were the most used intervention elements. Two interventions significantly reduced the prevalence of perinatal depression compared to usual care, and three interventions reported effectiveness in reducing depression symptom severity. There was little to no consistent evidence for other outcomes, including but not limited to maternal health care utilization, breastfeeding behaviors, and child health. This review provides limited evidence to suggest that non-specialist delivered interventions effectively improved outcomes among women with perinatal depression living in rural communities. The paucity of high-quality studies included in this review demonstrates that this rural demographic is frequently neglected in the context of maternal mental health research.

Emergency department clinicians' views on implementing psychosocial care following acute paediatric injury: a qualitative study.

Introduction: The early post-trauma period is a key time to provide psychological support to acutely injured children. This is often when they present to emergency departments (EDs) with their families. However, there is limited understanding of the feasibility of implementing psychological support for children and their families in EDs. The aim of this study was to explore UK and Irish ED clinicians' perspectives on developing and implementing psychosocial care which educates families on their children's post-trauma psychological recovery.Methods: Semi-structured individual and group interviews were conducted with 24 UK and Irish ED clinicians recruited via a paediatric emergency research network.Results: Clinicians expressed that there is value in offering psychological support for injured children and their families; however, there are barriers which can prevent this from being effectively implemented. Namely, the prioritisation of physical health, time constraints, understaffing, and a lack of training. Therefore, a potential intervention would need to be brief and accessible, and all staff should be empowered to deliver it to all families.Conclusion: Overall, participants' views are consistent with trauma-informed approaches where a psychosocial intervention should be able to be implemented into the existing ED system and culture. These findings can inform implementation strategies and intervention development to facilitate the development and delivery of an accessible digital intervention for acutely injured children and their families.

The emergency department provides an opportunity for early trauma-informed care for acutely injured children and their families.Addressing psychological distress in emergency care for acutely injured children and their families should adopt a universal trauma-informed approach.The development of a paediatric trauma-informed intervention should consider barriers which can impact implementation into emergency care. Particular barriers highlighted by clinicians include staff shortages, time constraints, and high caseloads.

A systematic literature review of the relationship between parenting responses and child post-traumatic stress symptoms.

Background: Parents are a key source of support for children exposed to single-incident/acute traumas and can thereby play a potentially significant role in children's post-trauma psychological adjustment. However, the evidence base examining parental responses to child trauma and child posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) has yielded mixed findings.Objective: We conducted a systematic review examining domains of parental responding in relation to child PTSS outcomes.Method: Studies were included if they (1) assessed children (6-19 years) exposed to a potentially traumatic event, (2) assessed parental responses to a child's trauma, and (3) quantitatively assessed the relationship between parental responses and child PTSS outcomes. A systematic search of three databases (APAPsycNet, PTSDpubs, and Web of Science) yielded 27 manuscripts.Results: Parental overprotection, trauma communication, avoidance of trauma discussion and of trauma reminders, and distraction were consistently related to child PTSS. There was more limited evidence of a role for trauma-related appraisals, harsh parenting, and positive parenting in influencing child outcomes. Significant limitations to the evidence base were identified, including limited longitudinal evidence, single informant bias and small effect sizes.Conclusion: We conclude that key domains of parental responses could be potential intervention targets, but further research must validate the relationship between these parental responses and child PTSS outcomes.

Child post-traumatic stress symptoms following acute trauma are consistently related to post-trauma parental overprotection, avoidance of trauma discussion and of trauma reminders, and promotion of distraction from trauma-related thoughts and stimuli.The findings from this review provide a potential rationale for targeting these parental domains in clinical interventions addressing children's post-traumatic stress symptoms.Future research is needed to validate the longitudinal relationship between parental response domains following children's traumatic exposure and child post-traumatic stress symptoms.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Group-Based Interventions for Treating Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Children and Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: Trauma exposure in childhood is common and can lead to a range of negative mental health outcomes, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In many settings, resources to address this distress are scarce. Group-based interventions require minimal resources and training, can be delivered by non-mental health specialists, and target larger numbers of children and adolescents. This meta-analysis sought to establish whether such an approach is an effective method for targeting PTSD symptoms and to identify potential moderators of effectiveness. METHOD: PubMed, PsycNET, and PTSDPubs were searched for randomized controlled trials that used a group-based PTSD intervention with children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years. Data were extracted for PTSD symptoms and depression symptoms. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to obtain between-group pooled effect size estimates. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187214). RESULTS: The initial search identified 9,650 studies, of which 42 were eligible for inclusion (N = 5,998). Children randomized to a group-based intervention had significantly lower PTSD symptoms after treatment compared with a control group, with a medium pooled effect (g = -0.55, 95% CI [-0.76, -0.35]). Group interventions were superior when compared with either active or passive controls, at follow-up, and for depression symptoms. There was a large amount of heterogeneity, but no evidence that this was explained by whether the intervention was delivered in a low- and middle-income or high-income country, included caregivers, or was universal or targeted. CONCLUSION: Group PTSD interventions, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy-based interventions, are effective at targeting posttrauma distress in children and adolescents. There was evidence of effectiveness when delivered in highly complex and resource-scarce settings and to a range of trauma-exposed groups, including groups exposed to war/conflict, natural disasters, and abuse.

Barriers to emergency department clinicians' confidence in providing paediatric trauma-informed care.

Background: It has been estimated that around 31% of children will experience a traumatic event during childhood, most commonly serious accidents that lead to hospitalisation. Around 15% of children who experience such events go onto develop post-traumatic stress disorder. Emergency department (ED) clinicians have a unique opportunity to intervene during the early peri-trauma period, which can involve incorporating a trauma-informed approach within their care. The available evidence indicates that clinicians internationally need further education and training to enhance their knowledge and confidence in providing trauma-informed psychosocial care. However, UK/Ireland specific knowledge is limited. Methods: The current study analysed the UK and Irish subset of data (N = 434) that was collected as part of an international survey of ED clinicians. Questionnaires indexed clinician confidence in providing psychosocial care, and a range of potential barriers to providing that care. Hierarchical linear regression was used to identify predictors of clinician confidence. Results: Clinicians reported moderate levels of confidence in providing psychosocial care to injured children and families (M = 3.19, SD = 0.46). Regression analyses identified negative predictors of clinical confidence, including a lack of training, worrying about further upsetting children and parents, and low levels of perceived departmental performance in providing psychosocial care (R 2 = 0.389). Conclusions: The findings highlight the need for further training in psychosocial care for ED clinicians. Future research must identify nationally relevant pathways to implement training programmes for clinicians, in order to improve their skills in relation to paediatric traumatic stress and to reduce the perception of barriers identified in the present study.