Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Bioinformatics ; 18(Suppl 15): 496, 2017 Dec 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29244014

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent progress in genome sequencing and assembly, many of the currently available assembled genomes come in a draft form. Such draft genomes consist of a large number of genomic fragments (scaffolds), whose positions and orientations along the genome are unknown. While there exists a number of methods for reconstruction of the genome from its scaffolds, utilizing various computational and wet-lab techniques, they often can produce only partial error-prone scaffold assemblies. It therefore becomes important to compare and merge scaffold assemblies produced by different methods, thus combining their advantages and highlighting present conflicts for further investigation. These tasks may be labor intensive if performed manually. RESULTS: We present CAMSA-a tool for comparative analysis and merging of two or more given scaffold assemblies. The tool (i) creates an extensive report with several comparative quality metrics; (ii) constructs the most confident merged scaffold assembly; and (iii) provides an interactive framework for a visual comparative analysis of the given assemblies. Among the CAMSA features, only scaffold merging can be evaluated in comparison to existing methods. Namely, it resembles the functionality of assembly reconciliation tools, although their primary targets are somewhat different. Our evaluations show that CAMSA produces merged assemblies of comparable or better quality than existing assembly reconciliation tools while being the fastest in terms of the total running time. CONCLUSIONS: CAMSA addresses the current deficiency of tools for automated comparison and analysis of multiple assemblies of the same set scaffolds. Since there exist numerous methods and techniques for scaffold assembly, identifying similarities and dissimilarities across assemblies produced by different methods is beneficial both for the developers of scaffold assembly algorithms and for the researchers focused on improving draft assemblies of specific organisms.


Assuntos
Mapeamento Cromossômico/métodos , Genômica/métodos , Software , Algoritmos , Genoma , Alinhamento de Sequência , Análise de Sequência de DNA
2.
Science ; 347(6217): 1258522, 2015 Jan 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25554792

RESUMO

Variation in vectorial capacity for human malaria among Anopheles mosquito species is determined by many factors, including behavior, immunity, and life history. To investigate the genomic basis of vectorial capacity and explore new avenues for vector control, we sequenced the genomes of 16 anopheline mosquito species from diverse locations spanning ~100 million years of evolution. Comparative analyses show faster rates of gene gain and loss, elevated gene shuffling on the X chromosome, and more intron losses, relative to Drosophila. Some determinants of vectorial capacity, such as chemosensory genes, do not show elevated turnover but instead diversify through protein-sequence changes. This dynamism of anopheline genes and genomes may contribute to their flexible capacity to take advantage of new ecological niches, including adapting to humans as primary hosts.


Assuntos
Anopheles/genética , Evolução Molecular , Genoma de Inseto , Insetos Vetores/genética , Malária/transmissão , Animais , Anopheles/classificação , Sequência de Bases , Cromossomos de Insetos/genética , Drosophila/genética , Humanos , Insetos Vetores/classificação , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Filogenia , Alinhamento de Sequência
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA