Bilateral spheno-orbital meningiomas: surgical management, progression, and recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral spheno-orbital meningiomas (bSOMs) are a rare entity among meningiomas. These tumors are benign and predominantly affect women. They represent 4% of spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs) and are poorly described in the literature. This study aimed to describe the characteristics, risk factors, evolution, and management of bSOMs. METHODS: Twenty patients with bSOMs were enrolled in a multicentric descriptive study including 15 neurosurgical departments. RESULTS: In this study, the authors found that bSOMs affected exclusively women, with a mean age of 50 years. Approximately 65% of patients were on progestin therapy. The mean follow-up in this series was 55 months. Clinically, visual symptoms were predominant: proptosis was present in 17 of 20 patients (85%; 7 unilateral, 10 bilateral), and a decrease in visual acuity was observed in 11 of 20 patients (55%; 6/10 to 9/10 in 6 patients, 3/10 to 5/10 in 1 patient, and < 3/10 in 4 patients). Contrary to unilateral SOMs, the authors identified that intracranial hypertension was a common presentation (25%) of bSOMs. Surgical management with gross-total resection was the gold standard treatment. Recurrences only occurred following subtotal resection in 36% to 60% of patients, with a median time of 50 to 54 months after surgery. Visual improvement or stability was observed in 75% of cases postoperatively. Progesterone receptor expression levels were 70% to 100% in 10 of 11 (91%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral SOMs are usually found in female patients and are strongly associated with hormone replacement therapy. Early surgical management with gross-total resection is the most effective treatment in terms of recurrence and improves visual acuity. Given the slow progressive nature of bSOMs and their time to recurrence, which can be up to 10 years, long-term follow-up of patients is essential.

Are there Still any Benefits to Drainage for Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis/Arthroplasty by Cervicotomy?

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study between January 2019 and 2023. OBJECTIVE: The role and contribution of drainage in the anterior approach to the cervical spine (cervicotomy) is much debated, motivated primarily by the prevention of retropharyngeal hematoma, so are there still any benefits to drainage? BACKGROUND: The anterior approach to the cervical spine is a widespread and common procedure performed in almost all spine surgery departments for the replacement of cervical intervertebral discs and medullar or radicular decompression. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of symptomatic postoperative cervical hematoma. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-one patients who had undergone cervical spine surgery by anterior cervicotomy for cervicarthrosis or cervical disc herniation (ACDF, ACDR) were consecutively included. Patients were separated into 2 groups: Group A, 140 patients (with postoperative drainage) and group B, 291 patients (without drainage). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 2.8 months. The 2 groups were comparable on all criteria, but there was a predominance of arthroplasty (P<0.0001), use of anticoagulants/antiaggregants (P<0.0001) and a greater number of stages (P<0.0001) in group A. There were a total of 4/431 symptomatic postoperative hematomas (0.92%) in this study. Two hematomas occurred in group A (2/140, 1.4%) and two in group B (2/291, 0.68%) (P<0.0001). One patient in group A (0.71%) required surgical drainage for cavity hematoma revealed by marked dyspnea, swallowing and neurological disorders. One case of hematoma diagnosed by dysphonia and neurological deficit was reported in group B (0.34% (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a drain during anterior cervicotomy for (ACDF/ACDR) did not limit the occurrence of symptomatic postoperative hematoma.

Impact of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fracture (pVCF) in neurological and survival prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fractures (pVCF) are the most serious debilitating morbidities of spine metastases (SpMs) causing devastating neurological damages. The respective impact of these two metastasis-spreading entities on survival and on neurological damage is debated. METHODS: A French prospective cohort study collected 279 consecutive patients presenting with SpMs between January 2017 and 2021. We compared 174 patients with MESCC and 105 patients with pVCF. RESULTS: The median Overall Survival (OS) for the MESCC group was 13.4 months (SD 1.5) vs 19.2 months (SD 2.3) for pVCF patients (p = 0.085). Sixty-five patients (23.3 %) were operated on: 49/65 (75.4 %) in the MESCC group and 16/65 (15.2 %) in the pVCF group, p < 0.0001. At 6 months FU, in the MESCC group, 21/44 (45.4 %) of non-ambulatory patients at onset improved to ambulatory status (Frankel D-E) vs 10/13 (76.9 %) in the pVCF group (p = 0.007). In multivariable analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model, good ECOG-PS and SINS Score 7-12 [HR: 6.755, 95 % CI 2.40-19.00; p = 0.001] were good prognostic factors for preserved ambulatory neurological status. However, SpMs diagnosed synchronously with the primary tumor [HR: 0.397, 95 % CI 0.185-0.853; p = 0.018] and MESCC [HR: 0.058, 95 % CI 0.107-0.456; p = 0.007] were independent risk factors for impaired neurological function. CONCLUSION: Contrary to pVCF, MESCC causes neurological damage. Nevertheless, neurological recovery remains possible. MESCC and pVCF have no impact on survival. The management of MESCC remains to be clarified and optimized to reduce neurological damage.

Spinal lesions in multiple myeloma: Primary bone tumors with distinct prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: Although prognostic factors of spinal multiple myeloma (MM) seem to differ from those of other spine metastases (SpM), the data in the literature remains scarce. METHODS: A prospective population of 361 patients treated for spine MM lesions between January 2014 and 2017. RESULTS: OS for our series was 59.6 months (SD 6.0 months; CI 95%: 47.7-71.3). Cox multivariate proportional-hazards analysis showed that bone marrow transplant [HR: 0.390, 95% CI 0.264-0.577; p < 0.0001] and light-chain isotype [HR: 0.748, 95% CI 0.318-1.759; p = 0.005] were independent predictors of longer survival. In contrast, age >80 years [HR: 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.3; p < 0.0001], ISS III [HR: 2.510, 95% CI 2.01-3.124; p = 0.001], IgA isotype [HR: 1.475, 95% CI 1.031-2.11; p = 0.034] and IgD/M isotype [HR: 2.753, 95% CI 1.230-6.130; p = 0.013] were independent poor prognostic factors. However, ECOG (p = 0.486), spine surgery (p = 0.391), spine radiotherapy (p = 0.260), epidural involvement (p = 0.259), the number of vertebra lesions (p = 0.222), and synchronous/metachronous timeline (p = 0.412) were not significantly associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal involvement in the context of MM does not influence OS. The main prognostic factors to consider before spinal surgery are the characteristics of the primary MM disease (ISS score, IgG isotype and systemic treatment).

Craniocerebral Gunshot Injuries in Chad: A Study of 44 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Firearm head injuries cause great public health concern because of their severity. They are life-threatening due to intracranial lesions and sepsis risks. This prospective study evaluates the management of craniocerebral wounds in Chad. METHODS: This is an observational study conducted over a period of 65 months with 44 patients with a ballistic craniocerebral wound (BCW), of which only 7.18% were assessed by neurosurgeons with gunshot wound. RESULTS: The mean age was 30.57 ± 13 years (range:2-60 years). The 21-30 age group was the most affected (31.8%). The sex ratio was 21. A total of 63.6% of cases involved military personnel. The average admission time was 24.95 ± 12 hours (range: 1-72 hours). Explosive device attacks represented 29.5% of cases, of which 53.3% occurred in civilian practice. Point-blank shooting was reported in 70.5% of cases. The entry hole of the projectile was frontal in 40.9%. Intracranial sequestration of the projectile was found in 56.8%. Association of upper limb trauma was found in 9.1% of cases. Brain scans were performed in 95.5% of cases. Surgical treatment was undertaken in 68.18% of cases. The recovery process was marked by brain abscess in 6.8% of cases. Seven deaths were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that BCW is frequent and mainly affects young male individuals in Chad. Many of the cases were related to improvised explosive device attacks, especially in civilian practice (70.5%). The delay in diagnostic and therapeutic management favors the high rate of sequelae.

Chronic low back pain during COVID-19 lockdown: is there a paradox effect?

PURPOSE: The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a compulsory lockdown of 3 months with strict restrictions. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has shown broad repercussions on patients with chronic pain; especially for conditions that present a significant emotional participation such as chronic low back pain (cLBP). METHODS: We performed a prospective study on 50 patients. Pre- and 1-month post-lockdown questionnaires such as: the Impact of Event Scale (IES), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Roland-Morris questionnaire (RMQ) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain intensity were collected. RESULTS: The mean time of the evolution of cLBP was 33.04 months (range 5-120 months). Eighteen (36%) patients improved their cLBP (i-cLBP), whereas for 14 (28%) it was worse (w-cLBP). Cox multivariate proportional hazard model identified that MODIC 1 disc disease [OR 19.93, IC95% (2.81-102.13), p = 0.015] and at-home workouts [OR 18.854, IC95% (1.151-204.9), p = 0.040] were good prognosis factors of the improvement of cLBP while subclinical/mild Covid-19 anxiety (IES score < 26) was a poor prognosis factor in improving cLBP [OR 0.21, IC95% (0.001-0.384), p = 0.009]. Furthermore, pre-lockdown benzodiazepine medication [OR 2.554, IC95% (1.20-9.9), p = 0.002] was a prognosis factor of worse cLBP. In contrast, patients with severe Covid-19 anxiety (IES score > 26) significantly improved their cLBP [OR 0.58, IC95% (0.025-0.834), p = 0.01]. CONCLUSION: Lockdown affected the somatic component of cLBP by decreasing activities and physical measures, whereas the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic spectrum paradoxically improved the psychic and emotional component of cLBP.

Predictors of Trigeminal Neuropathy After Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relationship between dosimetric characteristics and symptoms related to trigeminal neuropathy (TN) observed after radiosurgery (RS) for vestibular schwannomas (VS); to propose guidelines to optimize planification in VS RS regarding TN preservation; and to detail the mechanism of TN impairment after VS RS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred seventy-nine patients treated between 2011 and 2013 for VS RS and without trigeminal impairment before RS were included in a retrospective study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine predictors of TN among characteristics of the patients, the dosimetry, and the VS. RESULTS: There were 20 Koos grade 1, 99 grade 2, 57 grade 3, and 3 grade 4. Fourteen patients (7.8%) presented a transitory or permanent TN. Between the patients with and without TN after VS RS, there was no significant difference regarding dosimetry or VS volume itself. Significant differences (univariate analysis P<.05, Mann-Whitney test) were found for parameters related to the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve: total integrated dose, maximum dose, mean dose, volume of the Vth nerve (Volv), and volume of the Vth nerve receiving at least 11 Gy (VolVcist>11Gy), but also for maximal dose to the Vth nerve nucleus and intra-axial portion (Dose maxVax). After multivariate analysis, the best model predicting TN included VolVcist>11Gy (P=.0045), Dose maxVax (P=.0006), and Volv (P=.0058). The negative predictive value of this model was 97%. CONCLUSIONS: The parameters VolVcist>11Gy, Dose maxVax, and Volv should be checked when designing dosimetry for VS RS.