Robotic computed tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis: our experience of technique and outcomes.

Aim: We report the use of robot assistance for computed tomography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for the first time. Materials & methods: Four patients of upper abdominal cancer with intractable pain despite opioids were positioned prone on the PET-computed tomography scanner, which measured the accurate coordinates for the entry, depth and angle of the target point. The robot positioned its arm over the patient in accordance with the set needle path. The physician manually inserted needle through it and injected 20 ml of 0.75% alcohol after dye confirmation. Results: Significant reduction in pain scores and oral morphine consumption were observed in patients during 3 months follow-up. Conclusion: The robot precisely orients and helps in accurate placement of the needle through the robotic arm.

Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound for Iliopsoas Block: A Randomised Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare analgesic efficacy, improvement in the quality of life, psychology and learning curve for iliopsoas (IP) injection using ultrasound (US) versus fluoroscopy (FL). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with chronic low back pain secondary to IP myofascial pain were randomly allocated into two groups and were given IP injection in prone position, using either FL or US as a guide. Pain scores were assessed using numerical rating scale (NRS); learning curve was evaluated by the number of attempts, time taken and subjective ease of performing the procedure. The psychological and quality of life assessment were done using Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively. RESULTS: FL and US guided IP injection had equianalgesic efficacy with a decrease in preprocedure NRS pain scores from mean value of 7.06 6 0.24 and 6.78 6 0.24, respectively, to 2.22 6 0.29 and 1.78 6 0.26 (at 24 hours), 1.50 6 0.22 and 1.50 6 0.23 (1 week), 0.50 6 0.12 and 0.56 6 0.15 (4 weeks) and 0.33 6 0.11 and 0.44 6 0.15 (12 weeks) (P < .001). The learning curve was easier for US intervention with average attempts of 1-2 compared to 1-3 for FL. The average time taken to perform IP intervention was lesser for US group. The improvement in DASS and ODI was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: FL and US both are effective modalities for IP muscle injection as they provide equal relief from pain, disability and psychological stress. US guided IP injections are easier to learn and perform in comparison with FL.