Longer time to testosterone recovery impacts favorably on outcomes for prostate cancer following androgen deprivation and radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of sustained hypogonadism after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) associated with radiotherapy in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of 213 consecutive PCa patients referred for radiotherapy plus ADT was carried out. Follow-up times including time to testosterone recovery (TTR) and bRFS were calculated from the end of ADT. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses predicting bRFS were used. The optimal cutoffs for TTR and duration of ADT were determined using the maximally selected rank statistics (MSRS). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 104 months, 18 patients relapsed among those who had recovered testosterone levels and 9 among those who did not. Median ADT duration was 36 months. The optimal cutoff for TTR was determined using MSRS. TTR >48 months was significantly associated with better bRFS (logrank, p < 0.0027). Five-year bRFS was 100% for >48 months vs. 85% for <48 months. TTR was the only significant variable for bRFS in multivariate Cox analysis. CONCLUSION: Our data show an association between longer TTR and bRFS values among PCa patients treated with ADT.

[Review of current treatment for hot flushes induced by androgen deprivation in prostate carcinoma]. / Revisión del tratamiento actual de los sofocos inducidos por deprivación androgénica en el carcinoma prostático.

Considering the currently increased incidence, prevalence and survival of prostate cancer, the management of hot flushes associated with LH-RH analog treatment must be taken into account. The most widely used and effective treatment is hormone replacement, though the latter is not without risks. It is presently possible to address hot flushes in these patients based on a broad range of treatment options in which hormone therapy may constitute a last option, due to the risk of tumor relapse or progression -- since prostate cancer is hormone sensitive. The present study reviews the currently used treatments and hygiene-dietary measures that may help reduce the symptoms. A review is made of both hormone and non-hormone therapies, based on the existing scientific evidence. Drugs such as the new antidepressants, gabapentin and clonidine may play an important role in the management of hot flushes. While the underlying mechanisms of action are varied, they are related to the complex feedback exerted by the sexual hormones upon the hypothalamic secretion of noradrenalin -- this being the principal etiological factor of hot flushes.

[Physiopathological mechanism of hot flushes-perspiration induced by androgen deprivation in prostate carcinoma]. / Mecanismo fisiopatológico de los sofocos-sudores inducidos por deprivación androgénica en el carcinoma prostático.

Hot flushes and perspiration are common problems during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate carcinoma, and largely contribute to worsen patient quality of life. Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain the underlying physiopathological mechanisms, though all are very complex, basically because of the multiple causal factors involved. The present review offers a pondered and updated perspective of the origin of hot flushes-perspiration in such patients. Negative feedback of the plasma sexual hormones upon the hypothalamic secretion of noradrenalin and serotonin appears to be the main cause. Likewise, the direct action of such mechanisms upon the LH-RH producing hypothalamic center located close to the thermoregulatory center, together with shortening of the thermoneutral interval, would also play a role. Improved understanding of the causal mechanism may help improve the treatment of such symptoms.

[Single fraction boost with high dose rate interstitial brachytherapy in conservative treatment of breast carcinoma]. / Sobreimpresión en fracción única con braquiterapia intersticial de alta tasa en el tratamiento conservador del carcinoma de mama.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the effectiveness of interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy as a single fraction boost to the surgical bed in patients with breast cancer undergoing conservative treatment. The comparison was with the alternative of electron boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1999 and December 2000, we conducted a prospective study of 84 patients with infiltrative breast carcinoma treated with conservative surgery, with free margins. This was followed by external radiotherapy to the breast of up to 46 Gy and one application of brachytherapy with needles inserted into the surgical bed, and administering 7 Gy to 90% with high dose rate (HDR). RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 43 months, only one patient had therapeutic failure in the implant area, and local control was 98.5%. Another patient had a 2nd tumour in a different quadrant and 3 developed metastasis. Survival at 5 years was 98.7%. Acute toxicity was minimal, with excellent or good cosmetic appearance in 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy with high dose rate as single fraction boost in conservative treatment of breast carcinoma is simple, fast, well tolerated, with excellent local control, good cosmetic appearance, and with minimal late-onset toxicity.