Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 23(1): 268, 2023 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38053073

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Achievement of lipid targets is crucial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to mitigate the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Data on lipid-control status among patients with T2DM in Bangladesh are scarce. This study was conducted to determine the lipid-control status among patients with T2DM who were on lipid-lowering drugs in the country. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the diabetes outpatient departments of several tertiary hospitals in Bangladesh from January 2022 to December 2022. Adults of both sexes diagnosed with T2DM for at least one year and were on the lipid-lowering drug(s) for a minimum of 3 months were included in the study by consecutive sampling. Patients' data were collected by face-to-face interviews, and blood samples were collected for fasting lipid profile. The lipid target was set at < 200 mg/dL for total cholesterol (TC), < 150 mg/dL for triglyceride (TG), < 100 mg/dL for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), > 40 mg/dL for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and < 160 mg/dL for non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C). RESULT: Three thousand sixty patients (age 44.7 ± 13.3 years, female 57%) with T2DM were evaluated. Overall, almost 81% of the study subjects achieved the LDL-C target. Besides, TC, TG, HDL-C, and non-HDL-C targets were achieved by 40.8, 21.6, 66.3, and 44.1% of patients, respectively. However, all the lipid parameters were under control in only 8.8% of patients. Almost 77.6% of the patients with ischemic heart disease, 81.5% of patients with stroke, and 65% of patients with CKD had LDL levels < 70 mg/dL. Only 10.03% achieved the HbA1c target of < 7%. 7.4% of patients achieved both HbA1c < 7% and LDL < 100 mg/dL and 5% achieved both HbA1c < 7% and LDL < 70 mg/dL. Advanced age (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.98, p < 0.001), longstanding T2DM (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39, 0.72, p < 0.001), and non-statin therapy (aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16, 0.37, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with lipid control (LDL < 100 mg/dL) while using oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.45, 2.77, p < 0.001) and having cardiovascular comorbidity (aOR 3.92, 95% CI 3.00, 5.12, p < 0.001) were positively associated with lipid control. CONCLUSION: Though most patients with T2DM achieved their target LDL level, the prevalence of both glycemic and overall lipid control was low in our study despite lipid-lowering therapy.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Dislipidemias , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , LDL-Colesterol , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , HDL-Colesterol , Triglicerídeos
2.
Diabetol Metab Syndr ; 15(1): 139, 2023 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37365577

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the wide acceptability of fasting lipid profiles in practice, emerging evidence suggests that random lipid profiles might be a convenient alternative for lipid measurement. The objective of the present study was to compare the fasting and random lipid profile among subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: The present cross-sectional study included 1543 subjects with T2DM visiting several endocrinology outpatient clinics throughout Bangladesh from January to December 2021. The fasting lipid profile was measured in the morning following 8-10 h of overnight fasting, and the random lipid profile was measured at any time of the day, irrespective of the last meal. The values of fasting and random lipids were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Spearman rank correlation coefficients. RESULTS: In this study, a good level of correlation was observed between fasting and random lipid levels [r = 0.793, p < 0.001 for triglyceride (TG); r = 0.873, p < 0.001 for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); r = 0.609, p < 0.001 for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); and r = 0.780, p < 0.001 for total cholesterol (TC)]. In addition, TG and TC levels increased by 14% and 0.51%, respectively, in the random state compared to the fasting state (p- <0.05), while LDL-C levels decreased by 0.71% (p-value 0.42). No change was noticed in the HDL-C level. The difference between fasting and random lipid profiles was similar irrespective of patients' age, sex, BMI, glucose-lowering drug(s), and lipid-lowering therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Random lipid profile correlates significantly with fasting lipid profile with little difference. Hence, it might be a reliable alternative for fasting lipid profile in patients with T2DM.

3.
Cureus ; 14(11): e31889, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36579247

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bangladesh is anticipated to have the eighth-highest number of diabetic patients within the next 15 years. Approximately one-fifth of adult diabetes patients reside in Southeast Asian nations. This study aimed to find out the economic burden of extreme hypoglycemia on diabetic sufferers in Bangladesh. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out amongst 164 Type 2 Diabetes sufferers admitted due to extreme hypoglycemia within 15 months at BIRDEM in Dhaka to decide if they have the impact of extreme hypoglycemia on the cost of illness. The cost was once expressed in BDT. RESULTS: Direct medical cost (37058) and direct non-medical cost (5261) was estimated during the study. Among the direct medical cost, hospital cost was 17735, physician cost was 5745, nonmedical transport cost was 1802, and attendant cost was 3459. The total cost was 48743 BDT (€617) for each severe hypoglycemic event leading to hospitalization, and 6.4244 BDT (€82.4) would be the indirect cost of reduced productivity from spending 5.8 days (46.4 hours) in the hospital. CONCLUSION: The analysis indicates that hypoglycemia has a significant negative influence on the cost and reduces the work output of diabetics.

4.
Indian J Endocrinol Metab ; 22(4): 499-504, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30148097

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the impact of hypoglycemia on health-related quality of life from a patient perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 164 type 2 diabetes patients admitted due to severe hypoglycemia from August 2015 to October 2016 at Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, in Dhaka. Impact of severe hypoglycemia on health-related quality of life in diabetic patients was evaluated using the disease-specific questionnaire audit of diabetes-dependent quality of life-19 (ADDQOL-19). RESULTS: The median ADDQOL score was calculated at -3.31. Totally, 88 (53.7%) patients reported an ADDQOL score of - 3.31 or more, and 76 (46.3%) patients had an ADDQOL score of less than -3.31 (lower quality of life [QoL]). After considering weighting, "Freedom to eat" (mean Weighted Impact Score-6.32 ± 1.94) was the most and "Holidays" (mean Weighted Impact Score-0.96 ± 0.19) was the least affected QoL domains, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, severe hypoglycemia impact on ADDQOL was related with age (odds ratio [OR] 0.932, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.897-0.969, P < 0.001), sex (OR 0.088, 95% CIs 0.023-0.338, P < 0.001), glycated hemoglobin (%) (OR 0.613, 95% CIs 0.422-0.890, P = 0.010), and marital status (OR 9.264, 95% CIs 2.467-34.790, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis suggest hypoglycemia impacts heavily on the well-being and quality of life of people with diabetes, and every effort should be made to minimize hypoglycemia while aiming for good glycemic control.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA