Complex Valve Surgery in Elderly Patients: Increasingly Necessary and Surprisingly Feasible.

OBJECTIVES: The increasing proportion of elderly patients in cardiac surgery poses additional challenges for the clinical management and leads to a higher operative risk due to multiple comorbidities of these patients. We reviewed the outcome of patients who were 75 years and older and underwent complex multiple valve surgery at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who were 75 years and older and underwent multiple valve surgery between January 2011 and May 2016 at our institution. Patients were assigned to one out of four subgroups: combined aortic and mitral valve surgery (group AM), aortic and tricuspid valve surgery (group AT), mitral and tricuspid valve surgery (group MT), and aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valve surgery (group AMT). RESULTS: A total of 311 patients underwent multiple valve surgery, of whom 119 (38.3%) were 75 years and older (median: 78 [25th-75th quartile: 76-80]). The estimated operative mortality (EuroSCORE II) in the overall cohort was 10.7%. The observed 30-day mortality was 4.2% (7% in group AM, 0% in group AT, 2.2% in group MT, 3.8% in group AMT; p = 0.685). Main complications were reexplorative surgery in 16%, adverse cerebrovascular events in 6.7%, prolonged mechanical ventilation in 10.1%, renal replacement therapy in 15.1%, nosocomial pneumonia in 15.1%, and pacemaker implantation in 18.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of complex multiple valve surgery in elderly patients. The observed perioperative mortality was lower than predicted. However, we observed a substantial rate of adverse events; therefore, careful patient selection is required in this high-risk patient population.

Minimally invasive versus conventional extracorporeal circulation circuits in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a propensity-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation circuits provide several advantages compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation circuits. We compared the results of a minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system with those of conventional extracorporeal circulation system, in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: We identified 753 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting at our centre between October 2014 and September 2016. These patients were divided into two groups: a minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation group (M, n = 229) and a conventional extracorporeal circulation group (C, n = 524). Baseline parameters, details of cardiac surgery as well as postoperative complications and outcomes were compared by means of a propensity-matched analysis of 180 matched pairs. RESULTS: The median EuroSCORE II was 1.3%. Transfusion requirement of packed red blood cells (p = 0.002) was lower in Group M compared to conventional extracorporeal circulation systems. There were no differences in hospital mortality or in rates of adverse events between the matched groups. Total in-hospital mortality of the cohort was 1.7%. CONCLUSION: The use of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation is associated with a significantly lower use of blood products after isolated coronary revascularisation. There were no differences concerning duration of surgery, complication rates and mortality between the groups. Therefore, the application of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems should be considered as preferred technique in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures.