Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Center of Excellence recognition is associated with improved failure to rescue after cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: The influence of Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) center of excellence (CoE) recognition on failure to rescue after cardiac surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that ELSO CoE would be associated with improved failure to rescue. METHODS: Patients undergoing a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. Patients were stratified by whether or not their operation was performed at an ELSO CoE. Hierarchical logistic regression analyzed the association between ELSO CoE recognition and failure to rescue. RESULTS: A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers. In total, 807 developed cardiac arrest with 444 (55%) experiencing failure to rescue after cardiac arrest. Three centers received ELSO CoE recognition, and accounted for 4238 patients (9.71%). Before adjustment, operative mortality was equivalent between ELSO CoE and non-ELSO CoE centers (2.08% vs 2.36%; P = .25), as was the rate of any complication (34.5% vs 33.8%; P = .35) and cardiac arrest (1.49% vs 1.89%; P = .07). After adjustment, patients undergoing surgery at an ELSO CoE facility were observed to have 44% decreased odds of failure to rescue after cardiac arrest, relative to patients at non-ELSO CoE facility (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.316-0.993; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: ELSO CoE status is associated with improved failure to rescue following cardiac arrest for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. These findings highlight the important role that comprehensive quality programs serve in improving perioperative outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Renal recovery in cardiac surgery patients requiring postoperative renal-replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Renal failure after cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of data examining the rate of renal recovery after patients have started dialysis following cardiac surgery. We aimed to determine the frequency of and time to renal recovery of patients requiring dialysis after cardiac surgery. METHODS: All patients who developed new-onset renal failure requiring dialysis following cardiac surgery at our institution from 2011 to 2022 were included. Renal recovery, time to renal recovery, and mortality at 1 year were merged with patients' Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database files. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to predict time to renal recovery; we censored patients who died or were lost to follow up. Cox regression was used for risk-adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients were included in the final analysis. Mortality during index hospital admission was 33% (n = 105), and mortality at 1 year was 45% (n = 141). Of those surviving at 1 year, 69% (n = 118) remained renally recovered. Median renal recovery time was 56 (37-74) days. Accounting for mortality as a competing risk, 51% of patients were predicted to achieve renal recovery. Increasing age (hazard ratio, 0.98; 0.514-0.94, P < .026) and increasing total packed red blood cells (hazard ratio, 0.0958; 0.937-0.987, P < .001) received were found to be significant negative predictors of renal recovery in the Fine-Gray model for subhazard distribution. CONCLUSIONS: More than two-thirds of patients with renal failure who survived the perioperative period had renal recovery within 1 year after surgery. Recovery was driven primarily by postoperative complications rather than comorbidities and intraoperative factors, suggesting renal failure in the postoperative cardiac surgery patient surviving to discharge is unlikely to be permanent.

Center case volume is associated with Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined failure to rescue in cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Our understanding of the impact of a center's case volume on failure to rescue (FTR) after cardiac surgery is incomplete. We hypothesized that increasing center case volume would be associated with lower FTR. METHODS: Patients undergoing a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. After we excluded patients with missing Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores, patients were stratified by mean annual center case volume. The lowest quartile of case volume was compared with all other patients. Logistic regression analyzed the association between center case volume and FTR, adjusting for patient demographics, race, insurance, comorbidities, procedure type, and year. RESULTS: A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers during the study period. Of these, 5315 (12.2%) developed an FTR complication, and 735 (13.8% of those who developed an FTR complication) experienced FTR. Median annual case volume was 226, with 25th and 75th percentile cutoffs of 136 and 284 cases, respectively. Increasing center-level case volume was associated with significantly greater center-level major complication rates but lower mortality and FTR rates (all P values < .01). Observed-to-expected FTR was significantly associated with case volume (P = .040). Increasing case volume was independently associated with decreasing FTR rate in the final multivariable model (odds ratio, 0.87 per quartile; confidence interval, 0.799-0.946, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing center case volume is significantly associated with improved FTR rates. Assessment of low-volume centers' FTR performance represents an opportunity for quality improvement.

Cardiac Surgery Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic Worsened Across All Socioeconomic Statuses.

BACKGROUND: Increasing socioeconomic distress has been associated with worse cardiac surgery outcomes. The extent to which the pandemic affected cardiac surgical access and outcomes remains unknown. We sought to examine the relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and outcomes after cardiac surgery by socioeconomic status. METHODS: All patients undergoing a Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) index operation in a regional collaborative, the Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative (2011-2022), were analyzed. Patients were stratified by timing of surgery before vs during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 13, 2020). Hierarchic logistic regression assessed the relationship between the pandemic and operative mortality, major morbidity, and cost, adjusting for the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), STS predicted risk of mortality, intraoperative characteristics, and hospital random effect. RESULTS: A total of 37,769 patients across 17 centers were included. Of these, 7269 patients (19.7%) underwent surgery during the pandemic. On average, patients during the pandemic were less socioeconomically distressed (DCI 37.4 vs DCI 41.9; P < .001) and had a lower STS predicted risk of mortality (2.16% vs 2.53%, P < .001). After risk adjustment, the pandemic was significantly associated with increased mortality (odds ratio 1.398; 95% CI, 1.179-1.657; P < .001), cost (+$4823, P < .001), and STS failure to rescue (odds ratio 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.70; P = .005). The negative impact of the pandemic on mortality and cost was similar regardless of DCI. CONCLUSIONS: Across all socioeconomic statuses, the pandemic is associated with higher cost and greater risk-adjusted mortality, perhaps related to a resource-constrained health care system. More patients during the pandemic were from less distressed communities, raising concern for access to care in distressed communities.

Benign Feminizing Adrenal Tumor in an Adult Male.

Background: Feminizing adrenal tumors are rare and generally malignant tumors usually seen in male adults and children. We report the case of a benign feminizing adrenal tumor in a male patient. To our knowledge, only 2 other cases of benign, estrogen-only-secreting adrenal tumors have been reported. Case Report: A 44-year-old male with a history of hypertension presented to his primary care physician with chest tenderness, fatigue, and erectile dysfunction. Hormonal workup and imaging identified an estrogen-only-secreting adrenal adenoma. The adenoma was removed via laparoscopic adrenalectomy, and the patient had a normal postoperative course. Pathologic findings were an adrenal cortical adenoma with a Weiss score of 0 and a Ki-67 score of 0%. At 6-month follow-up, the patient's symptoms had significantly improved, and his previously abnormal sex hormone levels were within normal limits. Conclusion: Given the ambiguity in distinguishing between malignant and benign feminizing adrenal tumors, we suggest that radiologic (via Hounsfield units), clinical (via trending hormone levels), and histopathologic (via Weiss and Ki-67 scores) findings are sufficient to confirm the benign nature of this commonly malignant tumor.