From struggle to strength in African and Middle Eastern newcomers' integration stories to Canada: A participatory health equity research study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Newcomers (immigrants, refugees, and international students) face many personal, gender, cultural, environmental and health system barriers when integrating into a new society. These struggles can affect their health and social care, reducing access to mental health care. This study explores the lived experiences of African and Middle Eastern newcomers to Ontario, Canada. An understanding of newcomer integration challenges, successes and social justice issues is needed to improve health equity and social services. METHODS: In this qualitative study, we used a participatory research approach to collect stories reflecting participants' integration perspectives and experiences. Beginning with our immigrant community network, we used snowball sampling to recruit newcomers, ages 18 to 30, originating from Africa or the Middle East. We used qualitative narrative analysis to interpret stories, identifying context themes, integrating related barriers and facilitators, and resolutions and learnings. We shared our findings and sought final feedback from our participants. FINDINGS: A total of 18 newcomers, 78% female and approximately half post-secondary students, participated in the study. Participants described an unknown and intimidating migration context, with periods of loneliness and isolation aggravated by cold winter conditions and unfamiliar language and culture. Amidst the struggles, the support of friends and family, along with engaging in schoolwork, exploring new learning opportunities, and participating in community services, all facilitated integration and forged new resilience. CONCLUSIONS: Community building, friendships, and local services emerged as key elements for future immigrant service research. Utilizing a participatory health research approach allowed us to respond to the call for social justice-oriented research that helps to generate scientific knowledge for promoting culturally adaptive health care and access for marginalized populations.

"I Learned Myself": Using Structuration Theory to Uncover Korean Immigrants' Health Literacy Development in the U.S. as an Agentic Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The health literacy of immigrants has been often viewed in a deficit model. By using structuration theory as a theoretical lens, this study aimed to uncover the health literacy development of Korean immigrants in the U.S. as an agentic behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with Korean immigrants in the U.S. Findings reveal how the participants' experience was shaped by structural forces such as conflicting but co-existing public health systems between the U.S. and Korea, information overload, and the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic. Participants also employed strategies such as constantly comparing the public health guidelines from the two countries, critically appraising the information, deliberately choosing which guideline to follow, combating misinformation, and regulating media consumption. These strategies enabled them to develop health literacy by leveraging their immigrant status as an advantage. Theoretical, practical, and policy implications are discussed.

An Intersectional Approach to Understanding Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Mental Health Issues Among Muslim Immigrant Women in Canada.

Although addressing cultural and religious practices is important in providing mental health care, little research exists on understanding mental health issues of minority groups such as Muslim immigrant women. We employed an intersectional approach to examine beliefs and attitudes toward mental health issues among Muslim immigrant women in Canada. Four focus groups (21 participants) were conducted, and 101 surveys were collected in Ottawa, Canada. Three core themes emerged from thematic content analysis of focus group data that relate to participants' communication about: 1) stressors, 2) mental health care seeking, and 3) utilizing coping strategies. The survey data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and One-Way ANOVA, the results of which supported the qualitative findings that social stigma was an important obstacle preventing those women from seeking professional mental health services. Muslim women with South and Southeast Asian cultural/ethnic backgrounds were more likely to get help from professionals than those with African cultural/ethnic backgrounds. No group differences were found in age, family income, and employment status. Broadly, the findings underscore the importance of developing knowledge about the intersections among gender, religion, cultural identity, immigration status, and social stigma that influence beliefs and attitudes toward mental health issues. Specifically, the findings point to the need for an intersectional approach that offers a more nuanced understanding for tailoring mental health care to Muslim immigrant women's needs.

Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Reasons for Vaccine Hesitancy Among New York State Refugees.

PURPOSE: Resettled refugees in the U.S. face a disproportionately high risk of COVID-19 exposure, infection, and death. This study examines COVID-19 vaccination status among adult participants and their minor children, reasons for vaccine hesitancy, and predictors of vaccine uptake, as well as sources of COVID-19 news and information and trust in those sources. METHOD: The data in this study were drawn from the Telehealth and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in New York Refugee Communities Survey (N = 353), conducted March-May, 2022. RESULTS: The multivariate results indicate that in this sample of resettled refugees, those who reported higher levels of educational attainment, were from Afghanistan, and those who had fewer concerns about the vaccine were more likely to accept vaccination. The participants in this study identified local health workers, clinics, and community organizations - places where social workers are present - as both the largest source of nonsocial media COVID-19 news and information and the most trusted source of COVID-19 news and information. DISCUSSION: The implications from this study provide social workers with an understanding of the social and behavioral factors impacting vaccine uptake in refugee communities. CONCLUSION: According to the NASW Code of Ethics, social workers must challenge inequalities that persist against marginalized groups, such as racial and ethnic health disparities. Social work practitioners can play an essential role in decreasing unjust health disparities by providing accurate, culturally appropriate information on public health concerns such as COVID-19 to their refugee clients and within interprofessional collaboration.

Social Media and Black Maternal Health: The Role of Health Literacy and eHealth Literacy.

BACKGROUND: Black women experience greater maternal mortality and morbidity than White women. Although there are many causes of this disparity, providing more and better maternal health information to this population may be beneficial. Social media offers a way to easily and quickly disseminate information to empower and educate Black women about health during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to identify social media use patterns to determine what sources Black women used to obtain information about pregnancy and to explore whether health literacy/eHealth literacy influence those patterns. METHODS: This cross-sectional, nationally representative survey panel included 404 Black women. Health literacy was measured by the Single Item Literacy Screener, and eHEALS was used to measure eHealth literacy. We examined participants' social media activity, social media use, social media use for support, and sharing of pregnancy-related health information. Relationships between health literacy, eHealth literacy, and social media use were assessed. KEY RESULTS: Overall, 67.5% of participants had high health literacy, and the average eHealth literacy score was high (34.5). Most women (71.6%) reported using more than three social media accounts as a source for pregnancy information. Women with low health literacy searched social media for general and specific pregnancy health information, reported more social media use during pregnancy in general (p < .001), and more use of social media for giving and getting support (p = .003). Women with higher eHealth literacy were more likely to report more social media use (r = 0.107, p = .039) and often used social media to give and get support (r = 0.197, p = .0001). Women with high health literacy more often reported sharing the pregnancy information they found on social media with their nurse (χ2 = 7.068, p = .029), doula (χ2 = 6.878, p = .032), and childbirth educator (χ2 = 10.289, p = .006). Women who reported higher eHealth literacy also reported more often sharing the pregnancy information they found on social media with their doctor (r = 0.115, p = .030), nurse (r = 0.139, p = .001), coworkers (r = 0.160, p = .004), and family or friends (r = 0.201, p = .0001). CONCLUSION: Substantial numbers of Black women use social media to find pregnancy health information. Future studies should elicit more detailed information on why and how Black women use social media to obtain pregnancy information and support as well as what role health literacy and eHealth literacy may have on birth outcomes. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(3):e119-e129.].

Advancing Community-Based Participatory Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Methods Commentary on the Lessons Learned from Working with Community Data Collectors on a Refugee Health Disparities Study.

This methods commentary focuses on lessons learned from working with community data collectors on a refugee health disparities study during the COVID-19 pandemic. While there is a strong literature base for community health workers in refugee or migrant communities, there is less known about the procedural elements, challenges, and effectiveness of using community data collectors (CDCs) in research with refugee or migrant communities. Recognizing the cultural wealth and unique strengths of local stakeholders in the refugee community, the research team employed a robust collaborative approach by partnering with CDCs to design and administer the Telehealth and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in New York Refugee Communities Survey. The study's success was largely due to the CDC partnership. This methods commentary highlights the utility of Community-Based Participatory Research as a culturally-responsive framework well-suited to exploring health disparities as part of a broader agenda of public health communication research.

Communication Dimensions of Healthcare Engagement and Patient Health Literacy for Immigrant Populations: A Systematic Review.

Health literacy is an important social determinant of health. Achieving health literacy of immigrants can be critical to empower this disadvantaged population in healthcare communication. However, to achieve this goal, it is a prerequisite to examine the relationship between health literacy and patient engagement in healthcare communication. This systematic review conceptualizes behavioral, emotional, and cognitive dimensions of patient engagement in healthcare communication and examines how health literacy and patient engagement among immigrants shape each other. A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant articles from five databases between 2010 and 2020. The reviewers synthesized findings from 15 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The results indicate that communication researchers should be more attentive to the emotional dimension of patient engagement in healthcare communication and that more empirical studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between health literacy and patient engagement among immigrants. Practical implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Identifying Health Equity Factors That Influence the Public's Perception of COVID-19 Health Information and Recommendations: A Scoping Review.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted global public health and public trust in health recommendations. Trust in health information may waver in the context of health inequities. The objective of this scoping review is to map evidence on public perceptions of COVID-19 prevention information using the PROGRESS-Plus health equity framework. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycInfo, and Embase databases from January 2020 to July 2021. We identified 792 citations and 31 studies published in 15 countries that met all inclusion criteria. The majority (30/31; 96.7%) of the studies used an observational design (74.2% cross-sectional, 16.1% cohort, 6.5% case study, 3.2% experimental trials). Most studies (61.3%) reported on perception, understanding, and uptake, and 35.5% reported on engagement, compliance, and adherence to COVID-19 measures. The most frequently reported sources of COVID-related information were social media, TV, news (newspapers/news websites), and government sources. We identified five important equity factors related to public trust and uptake of recommendations: education and health literacy (19 studies; 61.3%), gender (15 studies; 48.4%), age (15 studies; 48.4%), socioeconomic status (11 studies; 35.5%), and place of residence (10 studies; 32.3%). Our review suggests that equity factors play a role in public perception of COVID-19 information and recommendations. A future systematic review could be conducted to estimate the impact of equity factors on perception and behavior outcomes.