The Necessity or Not of Additional Endovascular Therapy to Medical Therapy for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Insights from 30-Day and 1-Year Results.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment between endovascular therapy and medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis is still unclear. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 treatments based on the results from currently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science were used for searching the RCTs evaluating the addition of endovascular therapy to medical therapy for treating symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis from the inception of these databases to September 30, 2022. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using STATA version 12.0. RESULTS: A total of 4 RCTs were involved in the current study, including 989 participants. In the 30-day results, the data showed that compared with the medical therapy alone group, the additional endovascular therapy group was associated with a higher risk of death or stroke (relative risk (RR): 2.857; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.756-4.648; P < 0.001), ipsilateral stroke (RR: 3.525; 95% CI: 1.969-6.310; P < 0.001), death (risk differences (RD): 0.01; 95% CI: 0.004-0.03; P = 0.015), hemorrhagic stroke (RD: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.01-0.06; P < 0.001), and ischemic stroke (RR: 2.221; 95% CI: 1.279-3.858; P = 0.005). In the 1-year results, the additional endovascular therapy group was related to a greater incidence of ipsilateral stroke (RR, 2.247; 95% CI, 1.492-3.383; P < 0.001) and ischemic stroke (RR: 2.092; 95% CI: 1.270-3.445; P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Given that the medical treatment alone was related to a lower risk of stroke and death in the short-term and long-term compared with endovascular therapy combined with medical therapy. Based on this evidence, these findings do not support the addition of endovascular therapy to medical therapy for treating patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis.

Long non-coding RNA MIR17HG impedes FOSL2-mediated transcription activation of HIC1 to maintain a pro-inflammatory phenotype of microglia during intracerebral haemorrhage.

Activation and polarization of microglia play decisive roles in the progression of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and lactate exposure correlates with microglia polarization. This study explores molecules influencing lactate production and microglia phenotype alteration following ICH. A murine model of ICH was induced by intracerebral injection of collagenase. The mice experienced autonomous neurological function recovery, haematoma resolution and rapid lactate production, along with a gradual increase in angiogenesis activity, neuronal recovery and an M1-to-M2 phenotype change of microglia. Galloflavin, a lactate dehydrogenase antagonist, suppressed this phenotype change and the functional recovery in mice. FOS like 2 (FOSL2) was significantly upregulated in the brain tissues from day 7 post-ICH. Overexpression of FOSL2 induced an M1-to-M2 phenotype shift in microglia and accelerated lactate production in vivo and in haemoglobin-treated microglia in vitro. Long non-coding RNA MIR17HG impeded FOSL2-mediated transcription activation of hypermethylated in cancer 1 (HIC1). MIR17HG overexpression induced pro-inflammatory activation of microglia in mice, which was blocked by further HIC1 overexpression. Overall, this study demonstrates that MIR17HG maintains a pro-inflammatory phenotype of microglia during ICH progression by negating FOSL2-mediated transcription activation of HIC1. Specific inhibition of MIR17HG or upregulation of FOSL2 or HIC1 may favour inflammation inhibition and haematoma resolution in ICH.

Bioinformatics analysis reveals the landscape of immune cell infiltration and novel immune-related biomarkers in moyamoya disease.

Objective: This study aimed to identify immune infiltration characteristics and new immunological diagnostic biomarkers in the cerebrovascular tissue of moyamoya disease (MMD) using bioinformatics analysis. Methods: GSE189993 and GSE141022 were downloaded from the GEO database. Differentially expressed gene and PPI analysis were performed. After performing WGCNA, the most significant module associated with MMD was obtained. Next, functional pathways according to GSEA, GO, and KEGG were enriched for the aforementioned core genes obtained from PPI and WGCNA. Additionally, immune infiltration, using the CIBERSORT deconvolution algorithm, immune-related biomarkers, and the relationship between these genes, was further explored. Finally, diagnostic accuracy was verified with ROC curves in the validation dataset GSE157628. Results: A total of 348 DEGs were screened, including 89 downregulated and 259 upregulated genes. The thistlel module was detected as the most significant module associated with MMD. Functional analysis of the core genes was chiefly involved in the immune response, immune system process, protein tyrosine kinase activity, secretory granule, and so on. Among 13 immune-related overlapping genes, 4 genes (BTK, FGR, PTPN11, and SYK) were identified as potential diagnostic biomarkers, where PTPN11 showed the highest specificity and sensitivity. Meanwhile, a higher proportion of eosinophils, not T cells or B cells, was demonstrated in the specific immune infiltration landscape of MMD. Conclusion: Immune activities and immune cells were actively involved in the progression of MMD. BTK, FGR, PTPN11, and SYK were identified as potential immune diagnostic biomarkers. These immune-related genes and cells may provide novel insights for immunotherapy in the future.

Clinical effectiveness of nimodipine for the prevention of poor outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: In clinical practice, nimodipine is used to control cerebral vasospasm (CVS), which is one of the major causes of severe disability and mortality in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, the exact efficacy of nimodipine use for patients with aSAH is still controversial due to the lack of sufficient and up-to-date evidence. Methods: In this meta-analysis, the latest databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed-Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and OVID-Medline were comprehensively searched for retrieving all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy of nimodipine in patients with aSAH. The primary outcome was a poor outcome, and the secondary outcomes were mortality and cerebral vasospasm (CVS). After detailed statistical analysis of different outcome variables, further evidence quality evaluation and recommendation grade assessment were carried out. Results: Approximately 13 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 1,727 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that a poor outcome was significantly reduced in the nimodipine group [RR, 0.69 (0.60-0.78); I2 = 29%]. Moreover, nimodipine also dramatically decreased the mortality [RR, 0.50 (0.32-0.78); I2 = 62%] and the incidence of CVS [RR, 0.68 (0.46-0.99); I2 = 57%]. Remarkably, we found a poor outcome and mortality were both significantly lower among patients with aSAH, with the mean age < 50 than that mean age ≥ 50 by subgroup analysis. Furthermore, the evidence grading of a poor outcome and its age subgroup in this study was assessed as high. Conclusion: Nimodipine can significantly reduce the incidence of a poor outcome, mortality, and CVS in patients with aSAH. Moreover, we strongly recommend that patients with aSAH, especially those younger than 50 years old, should use nimodipine as early as possible in order to achieve a better clinical outcome, whether oral medication or endovascular direct medication. Systematic review registration: www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd, identifier: CRD42022334619.