RESUMO
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs can optimize antimicrobial use and have been federally mandated in all hospitals. However, best stewardship practices in immunocompromised patients with cancer are not well established. Methods: An antimicrobial time out, in the form of an email, was sent to physicians caring for hospitalized patients reaching 5 days of therapy for targeted antimicrobials (daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, vancomycin, imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem) in a comprehensive cancer center. Physicians were to discontinue the antimicrobial if unnecessary or document a rationale for continuation. This is a quasi-experimental, interrupted time series analysis assessing antimicrobial use during the following times: period 1 (before time-out: January 2007-June 2010) and period 2 (after time-out: July 2010-March/2015). The primary antimicrobial consumption metric was mean duration of therapy. Days of therapy per 1000 patient-days were also assessed. Results: Implementation of the time-out was associated with a significant decrease in mean duration of therapy for the following antimicrobials; daptomycin: -0.89 days (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.38 to -.41); linezolid: -0.89 days (95% CI, -1.27 to -.52); meropenem: -0.97 days (95% CI, -1.39 to -.56); tigecycline: -1.41 days (95% CI, -2.19 to -.63); P < .001 for each comparison. Days of therapy/1000 patient-days decreased significantly for meropenem (-43.49; 95% CI, -58.61 to -28.37; P < .001), tigecycline (-35.47; 95% CI, -44.94 to -26.00; P < .001), and daptomycin (-9.47; 95% CI, -15.25 to -3.68; P = .002). Discussion: A passive day 5 time-out was associated with reduction in targeted antibiotic use in a cancer center and could potentially be successfully adopted to several settings and electronic health records.
RESUMO
We report identification of 5 patients with infections caused by NDM-5-producing E. coli harboring PBP3 mutations that showed reduced susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam and cefiderocol. Durlobactam, a novel diazabicyclooctane ß-lactamase inhibitor, demonstrated minimum inhibitory concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 2 µg/mL supporting future investigations into a potential role in clinical management.
RESUMO
ß-Lactamases can accumulate stepwise mutations that increase their resistance profiles to the latest ß-lactam agents. CMY-185 is a CMY-2-like ß-lactamase and was identified in an Escherichia coli clinical strain isolated from a patient who underwent treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam. CMY-185, possessing four amino acid substitutions of A114E, Q120K, V211S, and N346Y relative to CMY-2, confers high-level ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, and accumulation of the substitutions incrementally enhances the level of resistance to this agent. However, the functional role of each substitution and their interplay in enabling ceftazidime-avibactam resistance remains unknown. Through biochemical and structural analysis, we present the molecular basis for the enhanced ceftazidime hydrolysis and impaired avibactam inhibition conferred by CMY-185. The substituted Y346 residue is a major driver of the functional evolution as it rejects primary avibactam binding due to the steric hindrance and augments oxyimino-cephalosporin hydrolysis through a drastic structural change, rotating the side chain of Y346 and then disrupting the H-10 helix structure. The other substituted residues E114 and K120 incrementally contribute to rejection of avibactam inhibition, while S211 stimulates the turnover rate of the oxyimino-cephalosporin hydrolysis. These findings indicate that the N346Y substitution is capable of simultaneously expanding the spectrum of activity against some of the latest ß-lactam agents with altered bulky side chains and rejecting the binding of ß-lactamase inhibitors. However, substitution of additional residues may be required for CMY enzymes to achieve enhanced affinity or turnover rate of the ß-lactam agents leading to clinically relevant levels of resistance.IMPORTANCECeftazidime-avibactam has a broad spectrum of activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales including strains with or without production of serine carbapenemases. After its launch, emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains that produce mutated ß-lactamases capable of efficiently hydrolyzing ceftazidime or impairing avibactam inhibition are increasingly reported. Furthermore, cross-resistance towards cefiderocol, the latest cephalosporin in clinical use, has been observed in some instances. Here, we clearly demonstrate the functional role of the substituted residues in CMY-185, a four amino-acid variant of CMY-2 identified in a patient treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, for high-level resistance to this agent and low-level resistance to cefiderocol. These findings provide structural insights into how ß-lactamases may incrementally alter their structures to escape multiple advanced ß-lactam agents.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Ceftazidima , Humanos , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Cefiderocol , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
Observational data published over the past decade have suggested that concomitant receipt of piperacillin-tazobactam with vancomycin significantly increases the risk for vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury. Importantly, however, there is significant controversy surrounding this association, and debate continues about the veracity of the risk. Given this ongoing debate, the recently published "Cefepime vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults Hospitalized With Acute Infection: The ACORN Randomized Clinical Trial" is of tremendous interest to the infectious diseases community. In ACORN, the authors conclude that there was no association between receipt of cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam and the primary outcome of acute kidney injury or death by day 14, despite the fact that >75% of the population received concomitant vancomycin. In this perspective, we provide a brief history on the controversy, provide a critical analysis of the ACORN findings, and ultimately discuss how these data help inform the ongoing debate.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Inpatient beta-lactam allergy labels may increase the unnecessary use of aztreonam and non-beta-lactam antibiotics, which can then lead to more adverse events and increased health care costs, OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a novel 2-step process (medication history review followed by risk stratification) on rates of beta-lactam delabeling, aztreonam use, and desensitizations on pediatric, adult, and obstetrics inpatients at a tertiary academic center. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on 700 patients who received inpatient consultation from the Beta-Lactam Allergy Evaluation Service between August 2021 and July 2022. Patients were delabeled either by medication review alone, drug challenge alone if with a low-risk history, or penicillin skin test followed by drug challenge if with a high-risk history. Generalized linear regression modeling was used to compare aztreonam days of therapy in the intervention year with the 2 prior years. Drug desensitizations were assessed by electronic chart review. RESULTS: Most of the patients (n = 656 of 700, 94%) had more than or equal to 1 beta-lactam allergy label removed, clarified, or both; 77.9% of these patients (n = 511 of 656) had 587 beta-lactam allergy labels removed. Nearly one-third (n = 149, 27.6%) had 162 allergy labels removed solely by medication history review. All 114 penicillin skin tests performed had negative results, and 98% (8 of 381) of the patients who underwent any drug challenge passed. Only 5.7% of the delabeled patients were relabeled. There was a 27% reduction in aztreonam use (P = .007). Beta-lactam desensitizations were reduced by 80%. CONCLUSION: A full-time inpatient beta-lactam allergy service using medication history review and risk stratification can safely and effectively remove inpatient beta-lactam allergy labels, reduce aztreonam use, and decrease beta-lactam desensitizations.
Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas , Hipersensibilidade , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , beta-Lactamas/efeitos adversos , Pacientes Internados , Aztreonam/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/terapia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Penicilinas/efeitos adversos , Hipersensibilidade/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
The treatment of patients with infection secondary to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii with emerging cefiderocol resistance remains challenging and unclear. We present a case of in vivo emergence of pandrug-resistant A baumannii that was successfully treated with the compassionate use of investigational sulbactam-durlobactam-based antibiotic regimen. We also performed a longitudinal genomic analysis of the bacterial isolates and showed the development of resistance and genetic mutations over time.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To characterize a blaCMY variant associated with ceftazidime/avibactam resistance from a serially collected Escherichia coli isolate. METHODS: A patient with an intra-abdominal infection due to recurrent E. coli was treated with ceftazidime/avibactam. On Day 48 of ceftazidime/avibactam therapy, E. coli with a ceftazidime/avibactam MIC of >256 mg/L was identified from abdominal drainage. Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies WGS was performed on serial isolates to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Site-directed mutants of CMY ß-lactamase were constructed to identify amino acid residues responsible for ceftazidime/avibactam resistance. RESULTS: WGS revealed that all three isolates were E. coli ST410. The ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant strain uniquely acquired a novel CMY ß-lactamase gene, herein called blaCMY-185, harboured on an IncI-γ/K1 conjugative plasmid. The CMY-185 enzyme possessed four amino acid substitutions relative to CMY-2, including A114E, Q120K, V211S and N346Y, and conferred high-level ceftazidime/avibactam resistance with an MIC of 32 mg/L. Single CMY-2 mutants did not confer reduced ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility. However, double and triple mutants containing N346Y previously associated with ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in other AmpC enzymes, conferred ceftazidime/avibactam MICs ranging between 4 and 32 mg/L as well as reduced susceptibility to the newly developed cephalosporin, cefiderocol. Molecular modelling suggested that the N346Y substitution confers the reduction of avibactam inhibition due to steric hindrance between the side chain of Y346 and the sulphate group of avibactam. CONCLUSIONS: We identified ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in E. coli associated with a novel CMY variant. Unlike other AmpC enzymes, CMY-185 appears to require an additional substitution on top of N346Y to confer ceftazidime/avibactam resistance.
Assuntos
Ceftazidima , Escherichia coli , Humanos , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , beta-Lactamases/genética , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Plasmídeos/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) continues to serve as a major global health crisis. Clinicians practising in this modern era are faced with ongoing challenges in the therapeutic management of patients suffering from antimicrobial-resistant infections. A strong educational understanding and synergistic application of clinical microbiology, infectious disease and pharmacological concepts can assist the adventuring clinician in the navigation of such cases. Important items include mobilizing laboratory testing for pathogen identification and susceptibility data, harnessing an understanding of intrinsic pathogen resistance, acknowledging epidemiological resistance trends, recognizing acquired AMR mechanisms, and consolidating these considerations when constructing an ideal pharmacological plan. In this article, we outline a novel framework by which to systematically approach clinical AMR, encourage AMR-related education and optimize therapeutic decision-making in AMR-related illnesses.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This guidance document focuses on infections caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. This updated document replaces previous versions of the guidance document. METHODS: A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of infections caused by ESBL-E, AmpC-E, CRE, DTR-P. aeruginosa, CRAB, and S. maltophilia. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States. RESULTS: Preferred and alternative suggested treatment approaches are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, transitioning to oral therapy, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggested approaches apply for both adult and pediatric populations, although suggested antibiotic dosages are provided only for adults. CONCLUSIONS: The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial resistant infections. This document is current as of December 31, 2022 and will be updated periodically. The most current version of this document, including date of publication, is available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.
RESUMO
This JAMA Insights Clinical Update discusses current recommendations regarding prevention of Pneumocystis pneumonia in patients who are immunocompromised.
Assuntos
Pneumocystis carinii , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis , Adulto , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/microbiologia , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/prevenção & controle , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , QuimioprevençãoRESUMO
Immunocompromised patients with B-cell deficiencies are at risk for prolonged symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We describe 4 patients treated for B-cell malignancies with B-cell-depleting therapies who developed persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and had resolution of symptoms following an extended course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.
RESUMO
Objectives: To characterize a bla CMY variant associated with ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) resistance from a serially collected Escherichia coli isolate. Methods: A patient with an intra-abdominal infection due to recurrent E. coli was treated with CZA. On day 48 of CZA therapy, E. coli with a CZA MIC of >256 mg/L was identified from abdominal drainage. Illumina WGS was performed on all isolates to identify potential resistance mechanisms. Site-directed mutants of CMY ß-lactamase were constructed to identify amino acid residues responsible for CZA resistance. Results: WGS revealed that all three isolates were E. coli ST410. The CZA-resistant strain uniquely acquired a novel CMY ß-lactamase gene, herein called bla CMY-185 , harbored on an IncIγ-type conjugative plasmid. The CMY-185 enzyme possessed four amino acid substitutions relative to CMY-2 including A114E, Q120K, V211S, and N346Y and conferred high-level CZA resistance with an MIC of 32 mg/L. Single CMY-2 mutants did not confer reduced CZA susceptibility. However, double and triple mutants containing N346Y previously associated with CZA resistance in other AmpC enzymes, conferred CZA MICs ranging between 4 and 32 mg/L as well as reduced susceptibility to the newly developed cephalosporin, cefiderocol. Molecular modelling suggested that the N346Y substitution confers the reduction of avibactam inhibition due to the steric hindrance between the side chain of Y346 and the sulfate group of avibactam. Conclusion: We identified CZA resistance in E. coli associated with a novel CMY variant. Unlike other AmpC enzymes, CMY-185 appears to require an additional substitution on top of N346Y to confer CZA resistance.
RESUMO
Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against a variety of Gram-negative bacteria, including MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This agent is approved for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. However, most real-world outcome data come from small observational cohorts. Thus, we sought to evaluate the utilization of ceftolozane/tazobactam at multiple tertiary hospitals in Houston, TX, USA. Methods: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of patients receiving at least 48â h of ceftolozane/tazobactam therapy from January 2016 through to September 2019 at two hospital systems in Houston. Demographic, clinical and microbiological data were collected, including the infecting bacterial isolate, when available. The primary outcome was composite clinical success at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and clinical disposition at 14 and 30â days post ceftolozane/tazobactam initiation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of the primary outcome and mortality. Recovered isolates were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam and underwent WGS. Results: A total of 263 patients were enrolled, and composite clinical success was achieved in 185 patients (70.3%). Severity of illness was the most consistent predictor of clinical success. Combination therapy with ceftolozane/tazobactam and another Gram-negative-active agent was associated with reduced odds of clinical success (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.63). Resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam was noted in 15.4% of isolates available for WGS; mutations in ampC and ftsI were common but did not cluster with a particular ST. Conclusions: Clinical success rate among this patient cohort treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam was similar compared with previous experiences. Ceftolozane/tazobactam remains an alternative agent for treatment of susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic use is a risk factor for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Few studies have correlated use of prior antibiotic classes with CDI, microbiome composition, and disease severity in patients with cancer. We hypothesized that previous antibiotic exposure and fecal microbiome composition at time of presentation are risk factors for severe CDI in patients with cancer. METHODS: This non-interventional, prospective, cohort study examined 200 patients with cancer who had their first episode or first recurrence of CDI. C. difficile was identified using nucleic acid amplification testing. Univariate analysis was used to determine significant risk factors for severe CDI. Fecal microbiome composition was determined by sequencing the V3/V4 region of 16 s rDNA encoding gene. Differential abundance analyses were used to single out significant microbial features which differed across severity levels. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, factors associated with severe CDI included the presence of toxin A/B in stools (odds ratio [OR] 2.14 [1.05-4.36] p = 0.04 and prior 90-day metronidazole use (OR 2.66 [1.09-6.50] p = 0.03). Although alpha and beta diversity was similar between disease severity groups and toxin A/B in stools, increased abundance of Bacteroides uniformis, Ruminococcaceae, and Citrobacter koseri were associated with protection from severe CDI (p < 0.05) and depletion of anaerobes was higher in patients with prior metronidazole exposure. CONCLUSION: Use of metronidazole for non-CDI indications within 90 days prior to diagnosis and presence of toxin A/B in stools were associated with severe CDI. Findings provide valuable insights into risk factors for severe CDI in an underserved population with cancer that warrants further exploration.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are challenging populations for antimicrobial stewardship interventions due to a variety of reasons, including immunosuppression, consequent risk of opportunistic and donor-derived infections, high rates of infection with multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs), Clostridioides difficile, and need for prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis. Despite this, data on stewardship interventions and metrics that address the distinct needs of these patients are limited. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the current state of antimicrobial stewardship in SOT recipients, existing interventions and metrics in this population, and considerations for implementation of transplant-specific stewardship programs. RESULTS: Antimicrobial stewardship metrics are evolving even in the general patient population. Data on metrics applicable to the SOT population are even more limited. Standard process, outcomes, and balancing metrics may not always apply to the SOT population. A successful stewardship program for SOT recipients requires reviewing existing data, applying general stewardship principles, and understanding the nuances of SOT patients. CONCLUSION: As antimicrobial stewardship interventions are being implemented in SOT recipients; new metrics are needed to assess their impact. In conclusion, SOT patients present a challenging but important opportunity for antimicrobial stewards. ABBREVIATIONS: SOT, antimicrobial stewardship program, MDRO, Clostridioides difficile infection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America, prospective audit and feedback, hematopoietic cell transplant, cytomegalovirus, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, surgical site infections, nucleic acid amplification testing, days of therapy, defined daily dose, and length of stay.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Ácidos Nucleicos , Transplante de Órgãos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Transplantados , Combinação Trimetoprima e SulfametoxazolRESUMO
Failure to maintain segregation of oral and gut microbial communities has been linked to several diseases. We sought to characterize oral-fecal microbiome community coalescence, ectopic extension of oral bacteria, clinical variables contributing to this phenomenon, and associated infectious consequences by analyzing the 16S rRNA V4 sequences of longitudinal fecal (n=551) and oral (n=737) samples from 97 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving induction chemotherapy (IC). Clustering observed in permutation based multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and PCoA plot of UniFrac distances between intra-patient longitudinal oral-stool sample pairs suggested potential oral-stool microbial community coalescence. Bray-Curtis dissimilarities and UniFrac distances were used to create an objective definition of microbial community coalescence. We determined that only 23 of the 92 patients exhibited oral-stool community coalescence. This was validated through a linear mixed model which determined that patients who experienced coalescence had an increased proportion of shared to unique OTUs between their oral-stool sample pairs over time compared to non-coalesced patients. Evaluation of longitudinal microbial characteristics revealed that patients who experienced coalescence had increased stool abundance of Streptococcus and Stenotrophomonas compared to non-coalesced patients. When treated as a time-varying covariate, each additional day of linezolid (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06 - 1.24, P <0.001), meropenem (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.21, P = 0.001), metronidazole (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.21, P = 0.001), and cefepime (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.18, P = 0.021) increased the hazard of oral-stool microbial community coalescence. Levofloxacin receipt was associated with a lower risk of microbiome community coalescence (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 - 0.93, P = 0.009). By the time of neutrophil recovery, the relative abundance of Bacteroidia (P<0.001), Fusobacteria (P=0.012), and Clostridia (P=0.013) in the stool were significantly lower in patients with oral-gut community coalescence. Exhibiting oral-stool community coalescence was associated with the occurrence of infections prior to neutrophil recovery (P=0.002), as well as infections during the 90 days post neutrophil recovery (P=0.027). This work elucidates specific antimicrobial effects on microbial ecology and furthers the understanding of oral/intestinal microbial biogeography and its implications for adverse clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Microbiota , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genéticaRESUMO
The long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LGPs) dalbavancin and oritavancin are semisynthetic antimicrobials with broad and potent activity against Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. While they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections, their pharmacological properties suggest a potential role of these agents for the treatment of deep-seated and severe infections, such as bloodstream and bone and joint infections. The use of these antimicrobials is particularly appealing when prolonged therapy, early discharge, and avoidance of long-term intravascular catheter access are desirable or when multidrug-resistant bacteria are suspected. This review describes the current evidence for the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin in the treatment of invasive infections, as well as the hurdles that are preventing their optimal use. Moreover, this review discusses the current knowledge gaps that need to be filled to understand the potential role of LGPs in highly needed clinical scenarios and the ongoing clinical studies that aim to address these voids in the upcoming years.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Glicopeptídeos/química , Glicopeptídeos/farmacologia , Glicopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Lipoglicopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Teicoplanina/farmacologia , Teicoplanina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document. METHODS: A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States. RESULTS: Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations. CONCLUSIONS: The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.
Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas , Criança , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Estados Unidos , beta-LactamasesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) are currently the predominant bacterial pathogens in patients with cancer. Many GNB have become problematic due to the widespread emergence of resistance. Imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL) is a combination of the carbapenem imipenem with relebactam, a non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor. It is active against most pathogenic GNB including many that are resistant to other agents. We compared its in vitro activity to six other agents against 490 GNB recovered exclusively from patients with cancer because such data are scarce. METHODS: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) microbroth dilution methods were used for susceptibility testing. Whole genome sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) was performed on 30 selected isolates. RESULTS: IMI/REL was active against 98% of Enterobacterales and 87% of non-Enterobacterales isolates (excluding Stenotrophomonas maltophilia). It had potent activity against extended spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and other Enterobacterales (Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter Spp., and Serratia Spp.) and moderate activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. IMI/REL had potent activity against Achromobacter Spp., non-multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Sphingomonas paucimobilis and moderate activity against multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa. Overall, IMI/REL was associated with the lowest number of nonsusceptible isolates compared with six other agents (imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, and tigecycline) commonly used in patients with cancer. Whole genome sequencing performed on 30 resistant isolates (10 each of E. coli, K. pneumonia, and P. aeruginosa) did not reveal any predominant mechanism of resistance to IMI/REL. CONCLUSION: Its in vitro activity indicates that IMI/REL might have a role to play in the treatment of Gram-negative infections in patients with cancer.