Resilience in Residency and Beyond.

¼ Distinct from the burnout and wellness continuum, resilience is a developed and refined characteristic that propels an individual toward personal and professional success.¼ We propose a clinical resilience triangle consisting of 3 components that define resilience: grit, competence, and hope.¼ Resilience is a dynamic trait that should be built during residency and constantly fortified in independent practice so that orthopaedic surgeons may acquire and hone the skills and mental fortitude required to take on the overwhelming challenges that we all inevitably face.

Hospital Courses Differ Amongst Hip Fracture Patients With or Without Coronavirus-19 Positive Status Upon Admission.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the hospital course and disposition of COVID-19 positive versus negative patients following an operatively managed hip fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients presenting to a university medical center with a hip fracture who underwent surgical management between February 1, 2020 and April 1, 2021. COVID-19 diagnosis was obtained using PCR testing. Hospital length of stay, disposition, readmission, and mortality were compared between patients with and without COVID-19. RESULTS: 399 total patients were identified who met inclusion criteria, with 14 patients who were COVID-positive (3.1%). There was a 6.1 day increase in length of hospital stay for COVID-19 positive patients compared to those who were COVID negative (p = 0.002), without significant changes in disposition, readmission rates, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A positive COVID-19 test at the time of admission can significantly increase hospital admission duration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective Cohort Study.

What Program Characteristics Are Associated with Resident Racial Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery? An Analysis of Association of American Medical Colleges Data.

In orthopaedic surgery, there are fewer Black or African American (4%) and Hispanic or Latino (4%) residents compared with general surgery, internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics (5%-7% Black residents and 7%-9% Hispanic/Latino residents, respectively). There are also fewer underrepresented in medicine minority (URiM) faculty in orthopaedic surgery (6.1%) compared with general surgery (8.9%), otolaryngology (7.8%), internal medicine (9.7%), and obstetrics and gynecology (15.6%). Identifying program characteristics that are associated with the percentage of URiM residents could reveal strategies for improving diversity. Methods: Using Association of American Medical Colleges orthopaedic resident and faculty race/ethnicity data from 2007 to 2016, we analyzed the racial diversity of 166 of 207 residency programs. The primary outcome was program racial diversity, measured as the percentage of URiM residents per program. The top quartile of programs was compared with the other quartiles. Characteristics analyzed included percentage of URiM faculty, affiliation with a university/top 40 medical school/top 40 orthopaedic hospital, geographic region, city type, and city size. We used a multivariable linear regression model to evaluate program characteristics associated with diversity and a linear mixed-effects model with program-specific random effects to evaluate time trends. Results: The mean percentage of URiM residents per program was 9.3% (SD = 10.5%). In the top quartile of programs, URiM residents composed 20.7% ± 2.5% of the program compared with 5.8% ± 0.3% in other quartiles (p < 0.001). After adjusting for program and faculty size, the only factor associated with the number of URiM residents per program was the number of URiM faculty. For every 5 additional URiM faculty members, there was an associated increase in the number of URiM residents per program by 3.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-5.0). There was a small but statistically significant annual increase in the percentage of URiM residents per program of 0.207 (95% CI: 0.112-0.302) percentage points during the study period. Conclusion: URiM representation remains low among orthopaedic residents. Efforts to increase the URiM faculty base represent a potential strategy for programs to increase URiM representation among residents by attracting more diverse applicants.

Do Patients Want to Be Involved in Their Carpal Tunnel Surgery Decisions? A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel syndrome requires multiple decisions during its management, including regarding preoperative studies, surgical technique, and postoperative wound management. Whether patients have varying preferences for the degree to which they share in decisions during different phases of care has not been explored. The goal of our study was to evaluate the degree to which patients want to be involved along the care pathway in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter study of patients undergoing carpal tunnel surgery at 5 academic medical centers. Patients received a 27-item questionnaire to rate their preferred level of involvement for decisions made during 3 phases of care for carpal tunnel surgery: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. Preferences for participation were quantified using the Control Preferences Scale. These questions were scored on a scale of 0 to 4, with patient-only decisions scoring 0, semiactive decisions scoring 1, equally collaborative decisions scoring 2, semipassive decisions scoring 3, and physician-only decisions scoring 4. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients completed the survey between November 2018 and April 2019. Overall, patients preferred semipassive decisions in all phases of care (median score, 3). Patients preferred equally collaborative decisions for preoperative decisions (median score, 2). Patients preferred a semipassive decision-making role for intraoperative and postoperative decisions (median score, 3), suggesting these did not need to be equally shared. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome prefer varying degrees of involvement in the decision-making process of their care and prefer a semipassive role in intraoperative and postoperative decisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Strategies to engage patients to varying degrees for all decisions during the management of carpal tunnel syndrome, such as decision aids for preoperative surgical decisions and educational handouts for intraoperative decisions, may facilitate aligning decisions with patient preferences for shared decision-making.

Large Angiolipoma of the Hand as a Cause for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Angiolipomas of the hand and wrist are rare presentations with only a few case reports in the literature. These subtypes of lipomas can be infiltrating or noninfiltrating, often affecting treatment outcomes and strategies. Angiolipomas can present as tender masses and, on average, will appear much larger than simple lipomas. We present a case involving a patient with a large palmar noninfiltrating angiolipoma as a cause of carpal tunnel syndrome. The patient was treated with surgical excision, leading to the resolution of his carpal tunnel symptoms.

Implicit and Explicit Factors That Influence Surgeons' Decision-Making for Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that influence surgeons' decision-making in the treatment of distal radius fractures in older patients. METHODS: Fourteen clinical vignettes of a 72-year-old patient with a distal radius fracture were sent to 185 orthopedic hand and/or trauma surgeons. The surgeons were surveyed regarding the demographic/practice details, treatment decision (surgical or nonsurgical), and factors that influenced management, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, functional status, radiographic appearance, and handedness. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the effect of both surgeon-described (explicit) and given clinical (implicit) factors on the treatment decision and to evaluate for discrepancies. RESULTS: Sixty-six surgeons completed the survey, and 7 surgeons completed 10-13 vignettes. Surgeons made the explicit determination to pursue nonsurgical treatment based on the presence of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0.02 for surgery; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.05), but the observation of the underlying clinical data suggested that the recommendation for surgical treatment was instead based on a higher functional status (OR, 3.54/increase in functional status; 95% CI, 2.52-4.98). Those employed by hospitals/health systems were significantly less likely to recommend surgery than those in private practice (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.79) CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the presence of comorbidities, functional status, and practice setting has a significant impact on a surgeon's decision to treat distal radius fractures in older patients. The discrepancy between the surgeon-described factors and underlying clinical data demonstrates cognitive bias. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should be aware of cognitive biases in clinical reasoning and should work through consequential patient decisions using an analytical framework that attempts to reconcile all available clinical data.

Charges for Distal Radius Fracture Fixation Are Affected by Fracture Pattern, Location of Service, and Anesthesia Type.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize charges associated with operative treatment of distal radius fractures and identify sources of variation contributing to overall cost. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2009-2017. Outpatient claims were identified using the International Classification of Diseases-9/10-Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for distal radius fixation surgery. A multivariable mixed model regression was performed to identify variables contributing to total charges of the claim, including patient demographics, anesthesia method, surgery location (ambulatory surgery center [ASC] versus a hospital outpatient department [HOPD], operation time, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and billed procedure codes. RESULTS: A total of 9029 claims were included, finding older age, private primary insurance, surgery performed in a HOPD, and use of local anesthesia (vs general or regional) associated with increased total charges. There was no difference between gender, race, or ethnicity. Additionally, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), increased operative time/fracture complexity, and use of perioperative medications contributed significantly to overall costs. CONCLUSIONS: Charges for distal radius fracture surgery performed in a HOPD were 28.3% higher than compared to an ASC, and cases with local anesthesia had higher billed claims compared to regional or general anesthesia. Furthermore, charges for percutaneous fixation were 54.6% lower than ORIF of extraarticular fracture, and claims had substantial geographic variation. These findings may be used by providers and payers to help improve value of distal radius fracture care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Is Opioid-Limiting Legislation Effective for Hand Surgery Patients?

BACKGROUND: The Rhode Island State Legislature passed the Uniform Controlled Substances Act in 2016 to limit opioid prescriptions. We aimed to objectively evaluate its effect on opioid prescribing for hand surgery patients and also identify risk factors for prolonged opioid use. METHODS: A 6-month period (January-June 2016) prior to passage of the law was compared with a period following its implementation (July-December 2017). Thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty and distal radius fracture fixation were classified as "major surgery" and carpal tunnel and trigger finger release as "minor surgery." Prescription Drug Monitoring Database was used to review controlled substances filled during the study periods. RESULTS: A total of 1380 patients met our inclusion criteria, with 644 prelaw and 736 postlaw patients. Patients undergoing "major surgery" saw a significant decrease in the number of pills issued in the first postoperative prescription (41.1 vs 21.0) and a corresponding decrease in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (318.6 vs 159.2 MMEs) after implementation. A 30% decrease in MMEs was also seen in those undergoing "major surgery" in the first 30 days postoperatively (544.7 vs 381.7 MMEs). Risk factors for prolonged opioid use included male sex and preoperative opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: In Rhode Island, opioid-limiting legislation resulted in a significant decrease in the number of pills and MMEs of the initial prescription and a 30% decrease in total MMEs in the 30-day postoperative period after "major hand surgery." Additional research is needed to explore the association between legislation and clinical outcomes.

COBRE for Skeletal Health and Repair: The Impact of Aging on the Capacity for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Peripheral nerves are crucial to the motor and sensory function provided by our upper and lower extremities to our brain and spinal cord. Following trauma or illness, these nerves may be injured, leading to a loss of function that can be significantly debilitating. Fortunately, given the type of injury and under the right conditions, peripheral nerves can regenerate through well-coordinated biochemical processes. However, as individuals age, the ability for nerves to regenerate becomes less efficient, reducing nerve's potential for the nerve to return to its prior level of function. In this article, we review the research that has been conducted to illustrate the reasons for such a decline in regenerative capacity. In doing so, we explore the concept of inflammaging alongside aging-related impairments of the macrophage and Schwann cell during nerve regeneration.

Current Concepts in the Management of Dupuytren Disease of the Hand.

Dupuytren disease is a fibroproliferative disorder of the palmar fascia of the hand. Little agreement and remarkable variability exists in treatment algorithms between surgeons. Because the cellular and molecular etiology of Dupuytren has been elucidated, ongoing efforts have been made to identify potential chemotherapeutic targets that could modulate the phenotypic expression of the disease. Although these efforts may dramatically alter the approach to treating this disease in the future, these approaches are largely experimental at this point. Over the past decade, the mainstay nonsurgical options have continued to be percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and collagenase Clostridium hystoliticum, and the most common surgical option is limited fasciectomy.

Gorham Disease Limited to the Left Upper Extremity Without Hand Involvement.

In this case report, we present a young female patient with a history of Gorham disease, who sustained pathologic fractures of the left radius and ulna after a low-impact fall. Massive osteolysis of the left forearm and wrist was noted on plain radiographs. The patient had had 8 previous left upper-extremity fractures without evidence of disease in any other area of the body.

Global Volunteering in Orthopaedics: Availability and Implementation Considerations.

The World Health Organization describes traumatic injuries as a "neglected epidemic" in developing countries, accounting for more deaths annually than HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis combined. Low- and middle-income countries rely on volunteer assistance to address the growing surgical disease burden of traumatic injuries. Efforts to increase the availability of international electives for orthopaedic trainees can help with the short-term need for surgical personnel abroad and facilitate sustainability through capacity building, maximizing long-term benefits for all parties. The volunteer invariably benefits from this cross-cultural experience with many citing improved skills in communication, clinical diagnostics, appreciation of equality and diversity, and cost-consciousness. A consolidated discussion regarding barriers and implementation strategies can assist interested individuals and institutions plan for future volunteering endeavors.

Larger Initial Opioid Prescriptions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Are Associated with Greater Risk of Prolonged Use.

BACKGROUND: The ongoing U.S. opioid epidemic threatens quality of life and poses substantial economic and safety burdens to opioid abusers and their communities, physicians, and health-care systems. Public health experts have argued that prescription opioids are implicated in this epidemic; however, opioid dosing following surgical procedures remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between initial opioid prescribing following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the risk and quantity of long-term opioid use. METHODS: Patients undergoing THA or TKA from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2016, were identified. Preoperative 30-day opioid and benzodiazepine exposures were evaluated using the Rhode Island Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) in the postoperative inpatient stay, initial outpatient opioid prescription, and prescriptions filled from 31 to 90 days (prolonged use) and 91 to 150 days (chronic use) following the surgical procedure were calculated. Regression analyses evaluated the association between the initial postoperative opioid dosing and prolonged or chronic use, controlling for demographic characteristics, procedure, preoperative opioid and benzodiazepine exposures, anesthesia type, and use of a peripheral nerve block. RESULTS: A total of 507 patients (198 who underwent a THA and 309 who underwent a TKA) were identified. Increased inpatient opioid dosing (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 per 1 standard deviation increase in inpatient opioid MMEs; p = 0.001) and increased dosing in the first outpatient prescription (OR, 1.26 per 1 standard deviation increase in initial outpatient prescription MMEs; p = 0.049) were each independently associated with an increased risk of prolonged opioid use. Additionally, increased inpatient dosing postoperatively was strongly associated with a greater risk of chronic use (OR, 1.77 per 1 standard deviation increase in inpatient MMEs; p < 0.001). Among the 30% (151 of 507) of patients requiring prolonged postoperative opioids, each 1-MME increase in the initial outpatient prescription dose was associated with a 0.997-MME increase in quantity filled during the prolonged period (p < 0.001). Among the 14% (73 of 507) of patients requiring chronic opioids, every 1-MME increase in the initial outpatient dose was associated with a 1.678-MME increase in chronic opioid dosing (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Increased opioid dosing in the early postoperative period following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is associated with an increased risk of extended opioid use. A dose-dependent relationship between initial outpatient dosing and greater future quantities consumed by those with prolonged usage and those with chronic usage was noted. This study suggests that providers should attempt to minimize inpatient and early outpatient opioid utilization following TJA. Multimodal pain management strategies may be employed to assist in achieving adequate pain control while minimizing opioid utilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty: An Evaluation of Gender and Racial Diversity Compared with Other Specialties.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has adopted the strategic goal of evolving its culture and governance to become more strategic, innovative, and diverse. Given the charge to increase diversity, a focus on assessing and increasing diversity at the faculty level may help this cause. However, an analysis of gender and racial diversity among orthopaedic faculty has not been performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate faculty appointments for underrepresented minority (URM) and female orthopaedic surgeons. We also aim to draw comparisons between orthopaedic surgery and other specialties. METHODS: Data on gender, race, and faculty rank (clinical instructor, assistant professor, associate professor, and professor) of academic faculty for 18 specialties from 1997 to 2017 were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Faculty Roster. Assistant professors were designated as junior faculty, whereas associate professor and professor were considered senior faculty. URMs were defined using the AAMC definition-groups having lower representation than in the general population. Regression analysis was used to evaluate and compare the change over time and to compare the change across different specialties. RESULTS: Over the 20-year study period, the number of female faculty increased (8.8% pts) but represents a lower proportion than other specialties (13.9% pts) (p = 0.029). Female orthopaedic senior faculty grew slower (7.3% pts) than other specialties (14.7% pts) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the growth of URM faculty positions (2.0% pts) compared with all other specialties (2.4% pts) (p = 0.165). The proportion of orthopaedic URM senior faculty increased less (0.5% pts) than other specialties (2.5% pts) (p < 0.001), whereas more orthopaedic URM junior faculty were added than other specialties (2.2% pts) (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Although orthopaedic surgery has increased the representation of female and URM faculty members, it continues to lag behind other specialties. In addition, fewer female and URM orthopaedic faculty members obtained senior faculty status than other specialties. To address the differences seen in faculty diversity, a concerted effort should be made to recruit and promote more diverse faculty, given similar qualifications and capabilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV.

Which Decisions For Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Distal Radius Fractures Should Be Shared?

PURPOSE: To evaluate, from the surgeon's perspective, the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing decisions during an episode of care of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or distal radius fracture in patients aged greater than 65 years. METHODS: A consortium of 9 fellowship-trained hand/upper-limb surgeons used the RAND Corporation/University of California Los Angeles Delphi Appropriateness method to evaluate the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing 27 decisions for CTS and 28 decisions for distal radius fractures in patients aged greater than 65 years. Panelists rated each measure on a scale of 1 (definitely not important/feasible/appropriate) to 9 (definitely important/feasible/appropriate) in 2 voting rounds with an intervening face-to-face discussion. Panelist agreement and disagreement were assessed using predetermined criteria. RESULTS: Panelists achieved agreement on 16 decisions (29%) as important, 43 (78%) as feasible, and 17 (31%) as appropriate for sharing with patients. Twelve decisions met all 3 of these criteria and were therefore considered important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients. Examples in CTS included decisions to perform extra confirmatory diagnostic testing, to have surgery, and to perform a steroid injection into the carpal tunnel. Examples in distal radius fracture management included the decision to have surgery, type of pain medication prescribed after surgery, and whether to remove the implant. The remaining 43 decisions did not reach consensus on the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using a validated consensus-building approach, we identified 12 decisions made during an episode of care for CTS or distal radius fracture that were important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients from the surgeon's perspective. These decisions merit inclusion in shared decision-making models (eg, preoperative patient preference elicitation tools or decision aids) to align patient preferences with care decisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding which aspects of care are important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients may improve patient-centered care by aligning patient preferences with care decisions.

Has a Prescription-limiting Law in Rhode Island Helped to Reduce Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: In the United States, since 2016, at least 28 of 50 state legislatures have passed laws regarding mandatory prescribing limits for opioid medications. One of the earliest state laws (which was passed in Rhode Island in 2016) restricted the maximum morphine milligram equivalents provided in the first postoperative prescription for patients defined as opioid-naïve to 30 morphine milligram equivalents per day, 150 total morphine milligram equivalents, or 20 total doses. While such regulations are increasingly common in the United States, their effects on opioid use after total joint arthroplasty are unclear. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are legislative limitations to opioid prescriptions in Rhode Island associated with decreased opioid use in the immediate (first outpatient prescription postoperatively), 30-day, and 90-day periods after THA and TKA? (2) Is this law associated with similar changes in postoperative opioid use among patients who are opioid-naïve and those who are opioid-tolerant preoperatively? METHODS: Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA between January 1, 2016 and June 28, 2016 (before the law was passed on June 28, 2016) were retrospectively compared with patients undergoing surgery between June 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 (after the law's implementation on April 17, 2017). The lapse between the pre-law and post-law periods was designed to avoid confounding from potential voluntary practice changes by physicians after the law was passed but before its mandatory implementation. Demographic and surgical details were extracted from a large multi-specialty orthopaedic group's surgical billing database using Current Procedural Terminology codes 27130 and 27447. Any patients undergoing revision procedures, same-day bilateral arthroplasties, or a second primary THA or TKA in the 3-month followup period were excluded. Secondary data were confirmed by reviewing individual electronic medical records in the associated hospital system which included three major hospital sites. We evaluated 1125 patients. In accordance with the state's department of health guidelines, patients were defined as opioid-tolerant if they had filled any prescription for an opioid medication in the 30-day preoperative period. Data on age, gender, and the proportion of patients who were defined as opioid tolerant preoperatively were collected and found to be no different between the pre-law and post-law groups. The state's prescription drug monitoring program database was used to collect data on prescriptions for all controlled substances filled between 30 days preoperatively and 90 days postoperatively. The primary outcomes were the mean morphine milligram equivalents of the initial outpatient postoperative opioid prescription after discharge and the mean cumulative morphine milligram equivalents at the 30- and 90-day postoperative intervals. Secondary analyses included subgroup analyses by procedure and by preoperative opioid tolerance. RESULTS: After the law was implemented, the first opioid prescriptions were smaller for patients who were opioid-naïve (mean 156 ± 106 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 451 ± 296 before, mean difference 294 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001) and those who were opioid-tolerant (263 ± 265 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 534 ± 427 before, mean difference 271 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001); however, for cumulative prescriptions in the first 30 days postoperatively, this was only true among patients who were previously opioid-naïve (501 ± 416 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 796 ± 597 before, mean difference 295 morphine milligram equivalents; p < 0.001). Those who were opioid-tolerant did not have a decrease in the cumulative number of 30-day morphine milligram equivalents (1288 ± 1632 morphine milligram equivalents after the law's passage versus 1398 ± 1274 before, mean difference 110 morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: The prescription-limiting law was associated with a decline in cumulative opioid prescriptions at 30 days postoperatively filled by patients who were opioid-naïve before total joint arthroplasty. This may substantially impact public health, and these policies should be considered an important tool for healthcare providers, communities, and policymakers who wish to combat the current opioid epidemic. However, given the lack of a discernible effect on cumulative opioids filled from 30 to 90 days postoperatively, further investigations are needed to evaluate more effective policies to prevent prolonged opioid use after total joint arthroplasty, particularly in patients who are opioid-tolerant preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

A Prospective Evaluation of the Effect of Supervised Hand Therapy After Carpal Tunnel Surgery.

Background: The objective of this investigation is to examine the effect of postoperative therapy after routine carpal tunnel release. Our hypothesis was that supervised hand therapy does not improve outcomes after routine carpal tunnel release. Methods: Patients with carpal tunnel syndrome were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups based on the last digit of their medical record numbers to one of 3 groups: standard 6-week postoperative rehabilitation (standard therapy), expedited one-session postoperative rehabilitation group (expedited therapy), and no postoperative rehabilitation group (no therapy). The primary outcome measures were Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and return to work. The outcome questionnaire was completed preoperatively, at the 2-week follow-up visit, and monthly to 6 months after surgery. Results: All 3 treatment groups had similar mean QuickDASH scores preoperatively. At 1- to 6-month follow-up, all 3 groups had similar QuickDASH scores at each visit, and all showed a significant decline from baseline (preoperative) QuickDASH score. Overall, QuickDASH score decreased significantly from a preoperative visit mean of 42.7 to a final postoperative (visit 8) mean of 6.69. There was no significant difference in the mean QuickDASH score among all 3 groups at 6-month follow-up. There was no significance in the time of return to work among the 3 groups (standard therapy, 21.8 days; expedited therapy, 20.9 days; no therapy, 16.6 days). Conclusions: This investigation adds evidence that supervised hand therapy does not improve the outcomes of routine carpal tunnel surgery as measured by QuickDASH and return to work.

Opioid-Limiting Regulation: Effect on Patients Undergoing Knee and Shoulder Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect prescription-limiting legislation passed in Rhode Island has had on opioids prescribed following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery at various time points, up to 90 days postoperatively. METHODS: All patients undergoing the 3 most common arthroscopic procedures at our institution (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, partial meniscectomy, and rotator cuff repair) were included. Patients were selected from 2 6-month study periods (prepassage and postimplementation of the law). The state's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program database was queried for controlled substances filled in the perioperative period (from 30 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively). Multiple logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of chronic (>30 days) opioid use. RESULTS: The morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed in the initial postoperative script decreased from 319.04 (∼43 5-mg oxycodone tablets) in the prepassage to 152.45 MMEs (∼20 5-mg oxycodone tablets) in the postimplementation group (P < .001). The total MMEs filled in the first 30 days decreased from 520.93 to 299.94 MMEs (∼70 to ∼40 5-mg oxycodone tablets) (P < .001). MMEs filled between 30 and 90 days fell by 22.5% for all patients in this study; however, this change was not statistically significant (P = .263). Preoperative opioid use (odds ratio, 10.85; P < .001) and preoperative benzodiazepine use (odds ratio, 2.13; P = .005) predicted chronic opioid use postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: State opioid-limiting legislation reduced cumulative MMEs following arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery in the first 30 days. Further research assessing the impact of this legislation on postoperative pain control, patient satisfaction, and functional outcomes following surgery is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Opioid-limiting legislation associated with decreased 30-day opioid utilization following anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Since 2016, 35 of 50 US states have passed opioid-limiting laws. The impact on postoperative opioid prescribing and secondary outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of opioid-limiting regulations on postoperative opioid prescriptions, emergency department (ED) visits, unplanned readmissions, and reoperations following elective ACDF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective review of prospectively-collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred and eleven patients (101 pre-law, 110 post-law) undergoing primary elective 1-3 level ACDF during specified pre-law (December 1st, 2015-June 30th, 2016) and post-law (June 1st, 2017-December 31st, 2017) study periods were evaluated. METHODS: Demographic, medical, surgical, clinical, and pharmacological data was collected from all patients. Total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) filled was compared at 30-day postoperative intervals, before and after stratification by preoperative opioid-tolerance. Thirty- and 90-day ED visit, readmission, and reoperation rates were calculated. Independent predictors of increased 30-day and chronic (>90 day) opioid utilization were evaluated. RESULTS: Demographic, medical, and surgical factors were similar pre-law versus post-law (all p>.05). Post-law, ACDF patients received fewer opioids in their first postoperative prescription (26.65 vs. 62.08 pills, p<.001; 202.23 vs. 549.18 MMEs, p<.001) and in their first 30 postoperative days (cumulative 30-day MMEs 444.14 vs. 877.87, p<.001). Furthermore, post-law reductions in cumulative 30-day MMEs were seen among both opioid-naïve (363.54 vs. 632.20 MMEs, p<.001) and opioid-tolerant (730.08 vs. 1,122.90 MMEs, p=.022) patient populations. Increased 30-day opioid utilization was associated with surgery in the pre-law period, preoperative opioid exposure, preoperative benzodiazepine exposure, and number of levels fused (all p<.05). Chronic (>90 day) opioid requirements were associated with preoperative opioid exposure (odds ratio 4.42, p<.001) but not with pre/post-law status (p>.05). Pre- and post-law patients were similar in terms of 30- or 90-day ED visits, unplanned readmissions, and reoperations (all p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of mandatory opioid prescribing limits effectively decreased 30-day postoperative opioid utilization following ACDF without a rebound increase in prescription refills, ED visits, unplanned hospital readmissions, or reoperations for pain.

Opioid-Limiting Legislation Associated With Reduced Postoperative Prescribing After Surgery for Traumatic Orthopaedic Injuries.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate opioid-prescribing patterns after surgery for orthopaedic trauma before and after implementation of opioid-limiting mandates in one state. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred fifty-three patients (297 pre-law and 456 post-law) undergoing isolated fixation for 6 common fracture patterns during specified pre-law (January 1, 2016-June 28, 2016) and post-law (June 01, 2017-December 31, 2017) study periods. Polytrauma patients were excluded. INTERVENTION: Implementation of statewide legislation establishing strict limits on initial opioid prescriptions [150 total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), 30 MMEs per day, or 20 total doses]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Initial opioid prescription dose, cumulative MMEs filled by 30 and 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Pre-law and post-law patient groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, opioid tolerance, recent benzodiazepine use, or open versus closed fracture pattern (P > 0.05). The post-law cohort received significantly less opioids (363.4 vs. 173.6 MMEs, P < 0.001) in the first postoperative prescription. Furthermore, the post-law group received significantly less cumulative MMEs in the first 30 postoperative days (677.4 vs. 481.7 MMEs, P < 0.001); This included both opioid-naïve (633.7 vs. 478.1 MMEs, P < 0.001) and opioid-tolerant patients (1659.2 vs. 880.0 MMEs, P = 0.048). No significant difference in opioid utilization between pre- and post-law groups was noted after postoperative day 30. Independent risk factors for prolonged (>30 days) postoperative opioid use included male gender (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.9, P < 0.001) and preoperative opioid use (odds ratio 5.1, 95% confidence interval 2.4-10.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-limiting legislation is associated with a statistically and clinically significant reduction in initial and 30-day opioid prescriptions after surgery for orthopaedic trauma. Preoperative opioid use and male gender are independently associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.