[Clinical features of the ALK-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients who received first-line alectinib treatment]. / Birinci basamak alektinib tedavisi alan ALK mutasyonu pozitif akciger kanseri hastalarinin klinik özelliklerinin degerlendirilmesi.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the most common cancer type and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The positivity rate of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has been reported as 3-7%. This study aimed to investigate the pathological, clinical and demographic characteristics of ALK-mutant NSCLC patients who received first-line alectinib as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in two different centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed at the Medical Oncology Departments of Ankara City Hospital and Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital. Patients diagnosed with ALK-mutant NSCLC and received alectinib treatment as a first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor were enrolled to study and retrospectively analyzed. RESULT: A total of 38 patients (15 males, 23 females) were included in the study. Median age was 56.5. 55.3% of the patients were non-smokers. All of the patients had adenocarcinoma histology. Thirty-four patients (89.5%) were metastatic. Brain metastasis was detected in 44.7% of the patients. Thirty-three patients (86.8%) were using alectinib in first-line treatment. The remaining five patients were seen to have received at least one course of chemotherapy before. The objective response rate was 78.9% with alectinib treatment. The percentage of the patients who experienced at least one side effect was 34.2% and serious side effects were 7.9%. After median 9.5 months follow-up, median progression-free survival (PFS) was not achieved. 24-month PFS was 67% and 24-month overall survival was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results were compatible with previous studies in terms of the clinical, pathological and demographic features of the patients with ALK mutation. We observed that the majority of patients were non-smokers, relatively young, and female patients. The objective response rate and survival results were similar with phase 3 studies.

Drug-drug interactions in patients using tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are frequently used drugs in oncology practice. Although oral administration is an advantage, long-term use increases potential drug-drug interaction risk. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of potential TKI-drug interaction (PTDI) in patients who used TKIs and increase awareness of this subject. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 310 patients collected from four different oncology centers, where TKIs were administered for solid organ cancer, between January 2007 and December 2017. The potential interaction between TKI and any other prescribed drug was determined using ''Lexicomp® Drug Interactions, App Version 1.1'' software. RESULTS: Overall, 310 patients were included; among those, 301 (97.1%) were using another drug with TKI and 147 (47.4%) experienced PTDI at least once. The median number of additional drugs was 4 (range 1-12). We detected 250 PTDIs, of which 30.8% were major interactions. The most frequently interacting TKI was imatinib (29.6%), and the additional drug group was antibiotics (21.2%). We observed that PTDIs caused the following effects: TKI concentration was increased or decreased owing to 14.4% or 22.8% PTDIs, respectively, and electrocardiographic QT prolongation occurred in 22% of all PTDIs. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that use of higher number of additional drugs (odds ratio/OR=1.63), pre-existing lung cancer (OR=8.82), and use of pazopanib (OR=9.22) were potential risk factors. CONCLUSION: The rate of PTDI is quite high in patients using TKIs. Effort must be made to increase awareness of this subject. Increasing awareness aids in lowering toxicity rates and providing efficient antitumor therapy.

Endpoints in oncology clinical trials.

In oncology clinical trials, many different endpoints can be used as primary or secondary endpoints. Advances in cancer treatment have provided longer survival outcomes, particularly in certain types of cancer. Overall survival is accepted as the gold standard endpoint for demonstrating clinical benefit; however, it is associated with some disadvantages such as requirement of long-term follow-up, requirement of higher number of patients, and high cost. Thus, the question "what is the most appropriate endpoint in clinical trials?" comes to mind. The present review discusses the endpoints in oncology clinical trials.

Comparison of Clinicopathologic Parameters and Survivals Between Epstein-Barr Virus-positive and Her2-positive Gastric Cancers.

Gastric carcinomas are highly mortal neoplasms for which new therapeutic options are being searched. The molecular subtyping of gastric adenocarcinomas was proposed recently, and the relationship between etiopathogenetic types is still under investigation. Here we compared histopathologic, prognostic, and survival differences between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive and Her2-positive gastric adenocarcinomas. In a retrospective design, we searched the EBV status with Epstein Barr Virus encoded small RNA (EBER) in situ hybridization, and the Her2 status both by immunohistochemistry and by chromogenic in situ hybridization of 106 gastrectomized gastric carcinomas. Histologic and clinical prognostic parameters and survival information were determined, and retrieved from archival tissues and clinical notes. The Her2 positivity rate was 12.3% and the EBV positivity rate was 7.6%. Among EBER-positive cases, Her2 positivity was not detected. Her2 positivity was detected more in intestinal differentiated tumors, whereas EBER positivity was detected in undifferentiated tumors (P=0.003). There was no correlation of Her2 or EBER positivity with the tumor stage. Median survivals of EBER-positive, Her2-positive, and both negative cases were 11.5, 18, and 20.5 months, respectively. The tumor stage and distant metastasis were found to be significant for survival in the multivariate analysis. In our 106 gastrectomized gastric carcinoma cases, EBV-positive and Her2-positive groups were found to be unrelated as proposed in the upcoming classification of gastric carcinomas.

The prognostic value of UHRF-1 and p53 in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to examine whether UHRF-1 and p53 overexpression is a prognostic marker for gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients with gastric cancer (study group) and 23 patients with gastritis (control group) were evaluated. Immunohistochemistry was used to examine expression of UHRF-1 and p53 in gastric cancers and a control group diagnosed with gastritis. RESULTS: The median age was 63 years (18-83 years) in the study group. UHRF-1 was positive in 15 (23%) patients with gastric cancer and fi ve (21.7%) patients with gastritis (P = 0.559). UHRF1 expression level in gastric cancer is more powerful than in gastritis (P = 0.046). Thirty-seven (61%) patients with gastric cancer and only one patient with gastritis were p53 positive (P < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 12 months (1-110), the 2-year overall survival rates were 55% and 30% in negative and positive p53, respectively (P = 0.084). Also, the 2-year overall survival rates were 45% and 53% in negative and positive UHRF-1, respectively (P = 0.132). CONCLUSION: According to this study, UHRF-1 and p53 were not prognostic factors for gastric cancer, whereas they may have a diagnostic value for differentiating between gastric cancer and gastritis.