Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Upacicalcet in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Open-label 52-week Study.

Introduction Upacicalcet is a novel injectable calcimimetic. This phase 3 multicenter open-label study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of upacicalcet in hemodialysis (HD) patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Methods Japanese HD patients with serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels >240 pg/mL and corrected calcium (cCa) levels ≥8.4 mg/dL were enrolled. Upacicalcet with a dose range of 25-300 µg was administered after each dialysis for 52 weeks. The main efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving the target iPTH level (60-240 pg/mL). Results A total of 157 patients were enrolled, of whom 138 completed the study. Overall, 94.2% of patients achieved the target serum iPTH level at week 52. Neither symptomatic hypocalcemia nor cCa level <7.5 mg/dL occurred despite the negligible increase of concomitant vitamin D receptor activators and calcium carbonate. Upacicalcet improved the control of serum phosphate (P) and calcium levels regardless of baseline PTH levels and decreased intact fibroblast growth factor-23 levels. The largest parathyroid glands shrank, irrespective of their baseline volume or prior calcimimetic usage. Upacicalcet was well-tolerated, with no adverse events requiring dose reduction. Conclusion This is the first study to show that a calcimimetic improves serum P and cCa control without inducing severe hypocalcemia in patients with iPTH levels ≤300 pg/mL. Upacicalcet is efficacious in HD patients with mild-to-severe SHPT, with few safety concerns.

Physician and Patient Preferences for Treatment of Anemia Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease in Japan: A Survey Including Best-Worst Scaling.

Background: Several treatment options are available for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, there remains a lack of awareness of physician and patient preferences regarding these treatments. We aimed to explore physicians' and patients' perceptions and preferences regarding the management of anemia of CKD in Japan. Methods: A web-based survey, including best-worst scaling (BWS), was conducted with physicians who had treated ≥1 patient with anemia of CKD in the preceding year, and with patients with CKD who self-reported a clinical diagnosis of anemia of CKD or low hemoglobin levels. A three-step approach was used comprising cognitive interviews, a pilot survey, and a main survey. The BWS survey results were analyzed using multinomial logit and hierarchical Bayesian models. Results: The survey was completed by 906 participants: 103 patients (average age 60.6 years; 77.7% male) and 803 physicians (166 nephrologists, 214 cardiologists, 137 diabetologists, and 286 general internists). Almost all (96.0%) physicians surveyed considered anemia of CKD to be an important condition to treat. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors had the highest treatment satisfaction among physicians, whereas patients had the highest satisfaction with both erythropoietin-stimulating agent therapy and HIF-PH inhibitors. Approximately one-third (35.9%) of patients surveyed indicated that they were receiving treatment. When comparing the relative importance of attributes and levels, physicians favored efficacy (particularly improvement in hemoglobin levels), whereas patients favored safety (particularly a lower rate of severe adverse events). Conclusion: Although a majority of physicians consider treatment of CKD-related anemia important, differences in the perceptions and usage of medications exist between medical specialties. Preferences for the management of anemia of CKD vary between physicians and patients; therefore, patient involvement in treatment decisions may help optimize outcomes.

Explaining International Trends in Mortality on Hemodialysis Through Changes in Hemodialysis Practices in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Case-mix adjusted hemodialysis mortality has decreased since 1998. Many factors that influence mortality may have contributed to this trend and these associations may differ by continental region. We studied changes in hemodialysis facility practices over time and their potential role in mediating changes in patient survival. STUDY DESIGN: Observational prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult hemodialysis patients treated in hemodialysis 500 facilities participating in the Dialysis Outcomes Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) between 1999 and 2015 in the US, Japan, and 4 four European countries: Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK. PREDICTORS: Four practice measures at each facility: the percentages of patients with Kt/V>1.2, interdialytic weight gain [IDWG]<5.7%, phosphorus<6 mg/dL, and using AV fistulae. OUTCOMES: Patient survival. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Mediation analyses, adjusted for case mix, were conducted using 3-year study phase as the exposure and facility practice measures as potential mediators. RESULTS: In Europe, we observed a 13% improvement in overall case-mix adjusted survival per decade. Trends in facility practice measures, especially Kt/V and phosphorus, explained 10% improvement in case-mix survival per decade, representing 77% (10% explained of 13% improvement) of the observed improvement. In Japan, 73% of the observed 12%/decade improvement in case-mix adjusted survival could be attributed to facility practices, especially Kt/V and IDWG. In the US, 56% of the observed 47%/decade improvement in case-mix adjusted survival could be attributed to facility practices, especially AV fistula use and phosphorus control. LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured changes in the characteristics of the patient population over this period may confound the observed associations. CONCLUSION: The improvements in adjusted hemodialysis patient survival in Europe, Japan, and the US from 1999 to 2015 can be largely explained by improvements in specific facility practices. Future changes in patient survival may be responsive to further evolution in the implementation of common clinical practices.

Effect of aspirin on cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia: A post hoc analysis of the LANDMARK trial.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical benefits of aspirin in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain unclear. METHODS: The secondary analysis of the LANDMARK trial investigated whether aspirin use was associated with cardiovascular events (CVEs) and all-cause mortality was performed. A total of 2135 patients at risk for vascular calcification were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score matching. RESULTS: The risk of CVEs was comparable between participants with aspirin use at baseline and those without at baseline, between participants with aspirin use during the study period and those without during the study period, and between participants with new aspirin prescription and those without aspirin use during the study period. CONCLUSION: Aspirin use was not significantly associated with a lower risk of CVEs in participants undergoing hemodialysis patients at risk of vascular calcification.

Effect of ferric citrate hydrate on fibroblast growth factor 23 and platelets in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease and non-chronic kidney disease patients with iron deficiency anemia.

BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) increases levels of C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 (cFGF23) and platelet count (PLT), each of which is associated with cardiovascular events. Therefore, we hypothesized that iron replacement with ferric citrate hydrate (FC) would decrease cFGF23 levels and PLT in patients with IDA. METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, multicenter, 24-week clinical trial, patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and non-CKD complicated by IDA (8.0 ≤ hemoglobin < 11.0 g/dL; and serum ferritin < 50 ng/mL [CKD]; < 12 ng/mL [non-CKD]) were randomized 1:1 to FC-low (500 mg: approximately 120 mg elemental iron/day) or FC-high (1000 mg: approximately 240 mg elemental iron/day). If sufficient iron replacement had been achieved after week 8, further treatment was discontinued. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were allocated to FC-low (CKD n = 21, non-CKD n = 15) and FC-high (CKD n = 21, non-CKD n = 16). Regardless of CKD status, FC increased serum ferritin and transferrin saturation, did not change intact FGF23 or serum phosphorus, but decreased cFGF23. In FC-low group, median changes in cFGF23 from baseline to week 8 were -58.00 RU/mL in CKD and -725.00 RU/mL in non-CKD; in FC-high group, the median changes were -66.00 RU/mL in CKD and -649.50 RU/mL in non-CKD. By week 8, FC treatment normalized PLT in all patients with high PLT at baseline (>35.2 × 104/µL; FC-low: 1 CKD, 8 non-CKD; FC-high: 3 CKD, 8 non-CKD). CONCLUSION: Regardless of CKD status, iron replacement with FC decreased elevated cFGF23 levels and normalized elevated PLT in patients with IDA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCT2080223943.

Risk Factors for Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent CKD: Pooled Analysis of Four Global Roxadustat Phase 3 Trials.

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for thromboembolic events in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving roxadustat are unknown. Iron deficiency has been reported as a risk factor for thrombosis in the general population. METHODS: Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 in patients receiving roxadustat were evaluated in this pooled analysis of four global phase 3 trials, PYRENEES, SIERRAS, HIMALAYAS, and ROCKIES. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses with matched pairs of case-control data explored the relationship between thromboembolic events and last known laboratory parameters before event onset. RESULTS: Of 2354 patients, 1026 thromboembolic events were observed in 568 patients. Baseline risk factors found included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), Black race, high high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and history of thromboembolism, cardiovascular disease, or diabetes. Univariate case-control analyses revealed that high hemoglobin rate of rise (≥ 0.5 g/dL/week; odds ratio [OR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-4.46) showed a trend towards increased risk of thromboembolic events before week 12, and high rate of hemoglobin decline was associated with events after week 12 (< - 0.5 g/dL/week; OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.68-8.27) as compared to stable hemoglobin levels (≥ - 0.1 to < 0.1 g/dL/week). Multivariate case-control analyses showed that low last known hemoglobin level (< 10 g/dL: adjusted OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.04-3.50; vs ≥ 12 g/dL) and low last known transferrin saturation (TSAT < 10%: adjusted OR 3.78; 95% CI 1.71-8.39; vs ≥ 30%) before event onset were associated with events after week 12. In patients with last known TSAT < 30%, higher roxadustat dose was associated with thromboembolic events; however, no association was observed in those with TSAT ≥ 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Among various risk factors for thromboembolic events, it is reasonable to avoid a rapid increase and decline in hemoglobin levels as well as ensure TSAT ≥ 30%, rather than increasing the roxadustat dose. Graphical Abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02278341, NCT02273726, NCT02052310, NCT02174731.

Roxadustat is an oral treatment for patients with anemia, or low hemoglobin levels, due to chronic kidney disease. Thromboembolic events are caused by a blood clot blocking blood vessels, and they have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This analysis evaluated risk factors for thromboembolic events in patients receiving roxadustat to treat anemia of chronic kidney disease who are on dialysis. Two different statistical approaches were used to investigate risk factors for thromboembolic events that occurred before and after 12 weeks of roxadustat treatment. We found that rapid improvement of anemia after starting roxadustat treatment may be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events occurring in the first 12 weeks of treatment. In contrast, severe anemia or worsening of anemia was associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events after week 12. Low iron levels in the blood or greater decline of available iron in the blood from baseline were also detected as risk factors for the events after week 12, suggesting that iron supplementation is important in patients who are iron-deficient. Moreover, thromboembolic events were also associated with older age (≥ 65 years), Black race, high levels of inflammation, and having had a previous thromboembolic event or having a history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes. Some risk factors, such as iron status and hemoglobin levels, can be changed after beginning roxadustat treatment and should be monitored and modified, as needed.

Risk Factors for Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent CKD: Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Roxadustat Trials in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Thromboembolic events have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This post hoc analysis explored potential factors related to thromboembolic events in dialysis-dependent patients treated with roxadustat in four phase 3 clinical trials in Japan. METHODS: Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 were evaluated. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses using conditional logistic models with matched pairs of case-control data explored relationships between thromboembolic events and laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Of the 444 patients, 56 thromboembolic events were observed in 44 patients during ≤ 52 weeks of treatment. The proportion of venous and arterial thromboembolic events gradually increased after week 12. Baseline risk factors included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), shorter dialysis vintage (< 4 months), and history of thromboembolism. The absence of concomitant intravenous or oral iron therapy (including ferric citrate) was associated with thromboembolic events before week 12 (hazard ratio 11.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.36-37.71; vs presence). Case-control analysis revealed that low average transferrin saturation (< 10%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.25; 95% CI 1.52-25.62; vs ≥ 20%), high average transferrin level (≥ 2.5 g/L; unadjusted OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.23-15.39; vs < 2.0 g/L), and high average roxadustat dose (≥ 150 mg; unadjusted OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.07-33.16; vs < 50 mg) over the previous 8 weeks before the event onset were associated with thromboembolic events after week 12. However, adjustment for iron status extinguished the significant relationship between roxadustat dose and events. Multivariate case-control analysis showed that increased transferrin from baseline (≥ 1.0 g/L; adjusted OR 7.85; 95% CI 1.82-33.90; vs < 0.5 g/dL) and decreased mean corpuscular volume (< - 2 fL; adjusted OR 5.55; 95% CI 1.73-17.83; vs ≥ 0 fL) were associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: In addition to established risk factors, iron deficiency may be related to thromboembolic events. Graphical Abstract available for this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02780726, NCT02952092, NCT02780141, NCT02779764.

Roxadustat is an oral medicine that treats anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Thromboembolic events, or blood vessels blocked by a blood clot, have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This study explored potential factors that may be related to thromboembolic events in roxadustat-treated patients with anemia of CKD on dialysis before and after week 12. This study found that hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (older than 65 years), short amount of time on dialysis (less than 4 months), previous history of thromboembolic events, and not receiving iron therapy were risk factors for thromboembolic events before week 12. Iron deficiency and high roxadustat dose were risk factors for thromboembolic events after week 12. When iron status was also considered, we did not find that roxadustat dose was related to thromboembolic events. A different model found that increased levels of transferrin, a protein that transports iron, from baseline and decreased mean corpuscular volume, or smaller red blood cells, increased the risk of thromboembolic events. Patients with anemia of CKD on dialysis may benefit from more intentional monitoring and management of iron while receiving roxadustat.

Tenapanor for peritoneal dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia: a phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Tenapanor is a novel selective inhibitor of intestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 transporter. This is the first trial to assess the efficacy and safety of tenapanor in Japanese patients with hyperphosphatemia who are undergoing peritoneal dialysis. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial targeted patients whose serum phosphorus was within 3.5-7.0 mg/dL with phosphate binders at screening. After phosphate binder washout, tenapanor was orally administered twice-daily, stepwise from 5 to 30 mg/dose for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint, mean change in serum phosphorus level, was evaluated at week 8. The 16-week treatment period was completed with tenapanor alone, and only one phosphate binder type was allowed for combined use after the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients enrolled, 34 completed the study. At week 8, the primary endpoint, mean change in serum phosphorus level (last observation carried forward), was - 1.18 mg/dL (95% confidence interval: - 1.54, - 0.81 mg/dL) with tenapanor. From a baseline value of 7.65 mg/dL, serum phosphorus decreased to 6.14 and 5.44 mg/dL at weeks 8 and 16, respectively, and 46.3% and 76.5% of patients achieved serum phosphorus within 3.5-6.0 mg/dL at week 8 and week 16, respectively. The most common adverse event, diarrhea, occurred in 74.1% of patients; the severity of diarrhea was mild or moderate. Thus, the discontinuation percentage due to diarrhea was low at 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of tenapanor resulted in a sufficient reduction in serum phosphorus level at week 8 and was considered safe and tolerable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04766385.

Effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia: A post hoc analysis of the LANDMARK trial.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical benefits of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain obscure. METHODS: This is a post hoc cohort analysis of the LANDMARK trial investigate whether RASi use was associated with cardiovascular events (CVEs) and all-cause mortality. A total of 2135 patients at risk for vascular calcification were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity-score matching. RESULTS: The risk of CVEs was similar between participants with RASi use at baseline and those without RASi use at baseline and between participants with RASi use during the study period and those without RASi use during the study period. No clinical benefits of RASi use on all-cause mortality were observed. Serum phosphate levels were significantly associated with the effect of RASi on CVEs. CONCLUSIONS: RASi use was not significantly associated with a lower risk of CVEs or all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients at risk of vascular calcification.

Effects of NRF2 polymorphisms on safety and efficacy of bardoxolone methyl: subanalysis of TSUBAKI study.

BACKGROUND: In the TSUBAKI study, bardoxolone methyl significantly increased measured and estimated glomerular filtration rates (GFR) in patients with multiple forms of chronic kidney disease (CKD), including Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes and stage 3-4 CKD. Since bardoxolone methyl targets the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 pathway, this exploratory analysis of the TSUBAKI study investigated the impact of the regulatory single nucleotide polymorphism, rs6721961, on the effects of bardoxolone methyl. METHODS: Japanese patients aged 20-79 years with type 2 diabetes and stage 3-4 CKD were randomized to bardoxolone methyl 5-15 mg/day (titrated as tolerated) or placebo for 16 weeks. Genotype frequency, clinical characteristics, renal function, and adverse events were primarily assessed. RESULTS: Of 104 patients (bardoxolone methyl n = 55, placebo n = 49); 57% were genotype C/C, 32% C/A and 12% A/A. The frequency of the A/A genotype was higher among patients with diabetic kidney disease than in the general Japanese population (~ 5%). Measured and estimated GFRs increased from baseline in all genotypes receiving bardoxolone methyl. There were no significant differences between genotypes for safety parameters, including blood pressure, bodyweight, and levels of B-type natriuretic peptide, or in the type and frequency of adverse events, suggesting that the efficacy and safety of bardoxolone methyl are unaffected by the rs6721961 polymorphism-617 (C→A) genotype. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach of combining genome analysis with clinical trials for an investigational drug provides important and useful clues for exploring the efficacy and safety of the drug. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT02316821.

Phase 2 study of upacicalcet in Japanese haemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: an intraindividual dose-adjustment study.

Background: Upacicalcet is a novel small-molecule calcimimetic agent developed for intravenous injection. Here, we evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of upacicalcet treatment via intraindividual dose adjustment in haemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Methods: A phase 2, multicentre, open-label, single-arm study was conducted. Upacicalcet was administered for 52 weeks; the starting dose was 50 µg thrice a week, and then adjusted to 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, or 300 µg, according to the dose-adjustment method set in the protocol. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level achieving a target range of 60-240 pg/mL (target achievement rate) at week 18. Results: A total of 58 patients were administered upacicalcet. The target achievement rate of serum iPTH level at week 18 was 57.9%, which increased to 80.8% at week 52. The serum-corrected calcium (cCa) level decreased immediately after upacicalcet administration, but no further decrease was observed. Adverse events were observed in 94.8% of patients, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 20.7% of patients. The most common ADR was decreased adjusted calcium in eight patients; dizziness occurred as a serious ADR in one patient. The serum cCa level of patients who interrupted upacicalcet treatment at a serum cCa level of <7.5 mg/dL recovered to ≥7.5 mg/dL immediately after the interruption. Conclusions: In haemodialysis patients with SHPT, upacicalcet doses of 25-300 µg for 52 weeks were found to be highly effective and well-tolerated, with minor safety concerns.

Long-term safety and decrease of pill burden by tenapanor therapy: a phase 3 open-label study in hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia.

Phosphate binders (PBs) generally have a high pill burden. Tenapanor selectively inhibits sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3, reducing intestinal phosphate absorption. Tenapanor is a novel drug administered as a small tablet, twice daily. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety of tenapanor and its efficacy in decreasing PB pill burden. Tenapanor 5 mg twice daily was administered to hemodialysis patients with serum phosphorus level 3.5-7.0 mg/dl at baseline; the dose could be increased up to 30 mg twice daily. Patients could also switch from PBs. The primary endpoint was safety during 52-week administration. The key secondary endpoint was a ≥ 30% reduction in the total pill number of daily PBs and tenapanor from baseline. Of 212 patients starting treatment, 154 completed the study. Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event, occurring in 135 patients (63.7%); most events were classified as mild (74.8%). No clinically significant changes occurred other than serum phosphorus level. At Week 52/discontinuation, 158/204 patients (77.5%) achieved the key secondary endpoint. Complete switching from PBs to tenapanor was achieved in 50-76 patients (26.7%-41.5%), and 80 patients (51.9%) at Week 8-12 and Week 50, respectively. Serum phosphorus remained generally stable within the target range (3.5-6.0 mg/dl). These findings suggest the long-term safety and tolerability of tenapanor. Tenapanor could reduce or eliminate PB pill burden while controlling serum phosphorus levels.Trial registration: NCT04771780.

Randomized Study of Tenapanor Added to Phosphate Binders for Patients With Refractory Hyperphosphatemia.

Introduction: Serum phosphorus management is important for patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis to reduce the risk of hyperparathyroidism and ectopic vascular calcification. Phosphate binders (PBs) control serum phosphorus levels; however, some patients do not achieve adequate control with existing PBs. The similar mechanisms of action of each PB may limit their ability to lower serum phosphorus levels. Therefore, drugs with novel mechanisms of action that can be added to existing PBs to further lower serum phosphorus levels are desired. Tenapanor, a novel selective inhibitor of intestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 transporters, decreases passive phosphate absorption in the intestine, thereby decreasing serum phosphorus levels. Methods: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tenapanor treatment with up-titration when added to PBs among Japanese hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia poorly controlled by PBs alone. In total, 169 patients taking PBs whose serum phosphorus level was ≥6.1 and <10.0 mg/dl initiated the 8-week treatment (placebo + PB, n = 85; tenapanor + PB, n = 84). Results: The least squares mean change from baseline to week 8 in serum phosphorus level was -0.24 and -2.00 mg/dl in the placebo and tenapanor groups, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between groups (-1.76 mg/dl; P < 0.0001). Diarrhea as a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) occurred in 14.1% and 63.1% of patients in the placebo and tenapanor groups, respectively. All diarrhea events were mild or moderate. Conclusion: Tenapanor added to PBs improved serum phosphorus levels that could not previously be controlled by PBs alone, and no new safety concerns were raised.

Efficacy and Safety of Upacicalcet in Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a major complication of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Upacicalcet, a new injectable calcimimetic, acts on calcium-sensing receptors to suppress parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion. We examined the efficacy and safety of upacicalcet in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving HD. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomized Japanese patients undergoing HD with serum intact PTH (iPTH) concentrations >240 pg/ml and corrected calcium concentrations ≥8.4 mg/dl. Either upacicalcet or placebo was administered after each HD session for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants achieving the target mean serum iPTH concentration (60-240 pg/ml) at weeks 22-24. RESULTS: A total of 103 participants received upacicalcet, and 50 participants received the placebo. The percentage of participants achieving mean serum iPTH concentrations of 60-240 pg/ml during the evaluation period was 67% (69/103) in the upacicalcet group and 8% (4/50) in the placebo group. The difference between the two groups was 59% (95% confidence interval, 48% to 71%). Upacicalcet also decreased serum fibroblast growth factor-23, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, total type 1 procollagen-N-propeptide, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b concentrations. Adverse events were reported in 85% (88/103) and 72% (36/50) participants in the upacicalcet and placebo groups, respectively. The incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events, such as nausea and vomiting, was similar between the two groups. Serum corrected calcium concentrations <7.5 mg/dl were observed in 2% of participants in the upacicalcet group and no participants in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Upacicalcet, a novel injectable calcimimetic, is effective and safe for secondary hyperparathyroidism patients receiving HD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Phase 3 Study of SK-1403, NCT03801980 .

Efficacy of molnupiravir and sotrovimab in Japanese dialysis patients with COVID-19 in clinical practice during the Omicron (BA.1 and BA.2) pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: In the present study, the efficacy of sotrovimab and molnupiravir in dialysis patients with COVID-19 was investigated using a registry of COVID-19 in Japanese dialysis patients. METHODS: Dialysis patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 (Omicron BA.1 and BA.2) pandemic were analyzed. Patients were classified into four treatment groups: molnupiravir monotherapy (molnupiravir group), sotrovimab monotherapy (sotrovimab group), molnupiravir and sotrovimab combination therapy (combination group), and no antiviral therapy (control group). The mortality rates in the four groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 1480 patients were included. The mortality of the molnupiravir, sotrovimab, and combination groups were significantly improved compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that antiviral therapy improves the survival of dialysis patients with COVID-19 (hazard ratio was 0.184 for molnupiravir, 0.389 for sotrovimab, and 0.254 for combination groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: Sotrovimab showed efficacy in Omicron BA.1 but attenuated in BA.2. Molnupiravir also showed efficacy in BA.2, suggesting administration of molnupiravir would be important.

Iron Parameters in Patients Treated with Roxadustat for Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Roxadustat is a novel agent with a distinct mechanism of action compared to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and a potentially different combination of effects on iron parameters. This narrative review describes the effects of roxadustat on iron parameters and on hemoglobin levels in the context of iron supplementation in patients with anemia of non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) or dialysis-dependent (DD) chronic kidney disease (CKD). Roxadustat use was associated with a greater reduction in serum ferritin levels than seen with ESAs and an increase in serum iron levels compared to a decrease with ESAs. Decreases in transferrin saturation in patients treated with roxadustat were relatively small and, in the case of patients with NDD CKD, not observed by Week 52. These changes reflect the concomitant increases in both serum iron and total iron-binding capacity. Compared to placebo and an ESA, roxadustat improved iron availability and increased erythropoiesis while requiring less intravenous iron use. Hepcidin levels generally decreased in patients who received roxadustat compared to baseline values in all CKD populations; these decreases appear to be more robust with roxadustat than with an ESA or placebo. The mechanisms behind the effects of roxadustat and ESAs on iron availability and stores and erythropoiesis appear to differ and should be considered holistically when treating anemia of CKD.

Higher hemoglobin levels using darbepoetin alfa and kidney outcomes in advanced chronic kidney disease without diabetes: a prespecified secondary analysis of the PREDICT trial.

BACKGROUND: In the primary analysis of the PREDICT trial, a higher hemoglobin target (11-13 g/dl) with darbepoetin alfa did not improve renal outcomes compared with a lower hemoglobin target (9-11 g/dl) in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) without diabetes. Prespecified secondary analyses were performed to further study the effects of targeting higher hemoglobin levels on renal outcomes. METHODS: Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 8-20 ml/min/1.73 m2 without diabetes were randomly assigned 1:1 to the high- and low-hemoglobin groups. The differences between the groups were evaluated for the following endpoints and cohort sets: eGFR and proteinuria slopes, assessed using a mixed-effects model in the full analysis set and the per-protocol set that excluded patients with off-target hemoglobin levels; the primary endpoint of composite renal outcome, evaluated in the per-protocol set using the Cox model. RESULTS: In the full analysis set (high hemoglobin, n = 239; low hemoglobin, n = 240), eGFR and proteinuria slopes were not significantly different between the groups. In the per-protocol set (high hemoglobin, n = 136; low hemoglobin, n = 171), the high-hemoglobin group was associated with reduced composite renal outcome (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.96) and an improved eGFR slope (coefficient: + 1.00 ml/min/1.73 m2/year; 95% confidence interval: 0.38-1.63), while the proteinuria slope did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the per-protocol set, the high-hemoglobin group demonstrated better kidney outcomes than the low-hemoglobin group, suggesting a potential benefit of maintaining higher hemoglobin levels in patients with advanced CKD without diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT01581073).

Treatment satisfaction with molidustat in CKD-related anemia in non-dialysis patients: a post-hoc analysis of two clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the standard treatment for patients with renal anemia to increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels and reduce the need for blood transfusions. However, treatments targeting high Hb levels require high doses of ESAs administered intravenously, which is associated with an elevated risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Furthermore, there have been some problems such as hemoglobin variability and low achievement of target hemoglobin due to the shorter half-lives of ESAs. Consequently, erythropoietin-promoting medications, such as hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors, have been developed. This study aimed to evaluate changes in the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine version II (TSQM-II) domain scores relative to baseline in each trial, to assess patient satisfaction with molidustat versus darbepoetin alfa. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of two clinical trials compared treatment satisfaction with an HIF-PH inhibitor, molidustat, versus a standard ESA, darbepoetin alfa, as part of therapy in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal anemia. RESULTS: Exploratory outcome data using the TSQM-II showed that both arms in both trials had enhanced treatment satisfaction over the course of the study period, as well as improvements in most TSQM-II domains at week 24 of treatment. Molidustat was associated with convenience domain scores at multiple time points depending on the trial. More patients were highly satisfied with the convenience of molidustat than that of darbepoetin alfa. Patients treated with molidustat had increased global satisfaction domain scores compared with those treated with darbepoetin alfa; however, the differences in global satisfaction domain scores were not significant. CONCLUSION: These patient-reported satisfaction outcomes support the use of molidustat as a patient-centered treatment option for CKD-related anemia. REGISTRATION OF CLINICAL TRIALS: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03350321 (November 22, 2017). CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03350347 (November 22, 2017).

Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines on hemodialysis patients in Japan: A nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the outcomes of dialysis patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with those who did not use data from the Japanese COVID-19 registry. METHODS: A total of 1260 dialysis patients with confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 infection was included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who experienced breakthrough infection and those who were unvaccinated. The need of oxygen supplementation and mortality risks were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 24.2% in unvaccinated patients and 8.6% in breakthrough patients. The odds ratio of need of oxygen supplementation in the breakthrough patients relative to unvaccinated patients was 0.197. The hazard ratio of mortality in the breakthrough patients relative to unvaccinated patients was 0.464. CONCLUSION: Our prospective observational study showed that SRAS-CoV-2 vaccination in hemodialysis patients is vital for reducing need of oxygen supplementation and mortality risk.