The humoral immune response to the BNT 162B2 vaccine in pediatrics on renal replacement therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, data published on the immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT 162B2 vaccine in pediatric patients receiving renal replacement therapy are scant. Our primary objective is to study this population's humoral immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: Pediatric kidney transplant recipients (PKTRs) and hemodialysis recipients (HR) at our center who received two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT 162B2 vaccine were included. Transplant and HR who had PCR-positive COVID-19 infections during the study, regardless of their vaccine status, were also included. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein (S1/S2) IgG was measured after the second dose of the vaccine and after any PCR-positive COVID-19 infection as routine clinical practice. Data on demographics, induction, maintenance immunosuppressants, type of transplant, and posttransplant or dialysis duration were included. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients included, 19 were dialysis recipients who received two doses of vaccine without subsequent infection (HV), and 42 were kidney transplant recipients. All dialysis patients and 33 (78.6%) transplant recipients received two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT 162b2 vaccine. A total of 33.3% (11/33) of the transplant recipients who received vaccination developed COVID-19 infection (KTH) at a median time of 13 days after the second dose of vaccine. Nine transplant patients had pure COVID-19 infection without vaccination (KTI). The seroconversion rate in the HV group was 94.7% (18/19) compared to 50% (11/22) in the kidney transplant vaccine recipients who did not develop subsequent COVID-19 infection (KTV) (p < .001). The median S1/S2 IgG titers for the HV group were 400 AU/mL versus 15 AU/mL in the KTV group (p < .0001). There was no significant difference in the duration of the test from the second dose of the vaccine between HV and KTV (55 vs. 33.5 days, p = .095). The KTH had higher titers than KTV group (370 vs. 15 p < .0001). The median duration of the test after vaccination in the vaccine group and those with hybrid immunity was similar (35 vs. 33.5 days, p = .2).There were no clear predictors for seroconversion in the PKTRs. Natural infection alone was as good as the vaccine in eliciting humoral immune response. CONCLUSION: The humoral immune response to two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT 162B2 vaccine in PKTRs without subsequent COVID-19 infection is suboptimal compared to that in hemodialysis recipients and in PKTRs with hybrid immunity from both infection and vaccination.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on transplant laboratories: How to mitigate?

A positive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) due to donor specific antibodies (DSA) constitutes a risk for kidney transplantation; such a finding may indicates an unacceptable donor for this patient. However, positive FCXM in the absence of DSA is considered discordant and need further investigations. During COVID-19 pandemic, we observed 22% discordant results out of 445 FCXM performed during eight months period in our laboratory and another 7% were invalid due to high background negative control (NC). No study has addressed the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on FCXM and the overall pre-kidney transplant workups or described a solution to deal with these non-specific reactivities. Herein, we analyzed all FCXM results in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive patients and addressed how this pandemic affected significantly the pre-kidney transplant workups, highlighting both technical and financial implications. We also shared our modified FCXM procedures using dithiotheritol (DTT) sera treatment or blocking donor cells with negative control human serum (NCS) which we found to be successful to abrogate 98% of all discordant FCXM results and to validate all invalid results due to high background NC. In conclusion, COVID-19 pandemic has affected our HLA laboratory significantly by creating many false positive or invalid crossmatch results. Transplant laboratories must consider this before test interpretations and immune risk assessments. We recommend the use of DTT serum treatment to remove nonspecific bindings in the sera of kidney transplant candidates and the use of NCS-blocked donor cells to correct high background when performing FCXM in transplant candidates or donors with recent history of SARS-CoV-2 immunization respectively.

Severe delayed graft function in a living-related kidney transplant recipient due to combination of alloimmunity, autoimmunity, and heterologous immunity: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function is a manifestation of acute kidney injury unique to transplantation usually related to donor ischemia or recipient immunological causes. Ischemia also considered the most important trigger for innate immunity activation and production of non-HLA antibodies. While ischemia is inevitable after deceased donor transplantation, this complication is rare after living transplantation. Heterologous Immunity commonly used to describe the activation of T cells recognizing specific pathogen-related antigens as well unrelated antigens is common post-viral infection. In transplant-setting induction of heterologous immunity that cross-react with HLA-antigens and subsequent reactivation of memory T cells can lead to allograft rejection. METHODS: Here we describe a non-sensitized child with ESRD secondary to lupus nephritis and recent history of COVID-19 infection who experienced 17 days of anuria after first kidney living transplantation from her young HLA-haploidentical uncle donor. Graft histology showed acute cellular rejection, evidence of mild antibody-mediated rejection and vascular wall necrosis in some arterioles suggesting possibility of intraoperative graft ischemia. Both pre- and post-transplant sera showed very high level of several non-HLA antibodies. RESULTS: The patient was treated for cellular and antibody-mediated rejection while maintained on hemodialysis before her graft function started to improve on day seventeen post transplantation. CONCLUSION: The cellular rejection likely trigged by ischemia that activated T-cells-mediated immunity. The high level of non- HLA-antibodies further aggravated the damage and the rapid onset of rejection may be partly related to memory T-cell activation induced by heterologous immunity.

Durability of Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Its Relationship to Disease Severity Assessed Using a Commercially Available Assay.

Background: Assessing the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for inferring protective immunity from reinfection and for assessing vaccine efficacy. Data regarding the durability and sustainability of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are conflicting. In this study, we aimed to determine the seroconversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and the antibody dynamics, durability, and the correlation of antibody titers with disease severity using the commercially available SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike (S1/S2) protein. Methods: A total of 342 subjects with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled. A total of 395 samples were collected at different time points (0-204) after the onset of symptoms or from the day of positive PCR in asymptomatic patients. Demographics, clinical presentation and the date of PCR were collected. All samples were tested using the automated commercial chemiluminescent system (DiaSorin SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG) on the LIAISONXL® platform (LIAISON). Results: The seroconversion rate for samples collected 14 days after the onset of infection was much higher than that for samples collected before 14 days (79.4% vs. 39.4%). The rate of seroconversion in symptomatic participants (62.1%) was similar to that of asymptomatic participants (56.1%) (p = 0.496). The IgG titer distribution was also similar across both groups (p = 0.142), with a median IgG level of 27.86 AU/ml (3.8-85.5) and 15 AU/ml (3.8-58.85) in symptomatic and asymptomatic participants, respectively. However, IgG titers were significantly higher in ICU patients, with a median of 104 AU/ml (3.8-179) compared to 34 AU/ml (3.8-70) in the non-ICU participants (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the median time to seroconversion occurred significantly faster in ICU patients than in non-ICU participants (19 versus 47 days) (P < 0.0001). IgG titers were also higher in subjects ≥50 years compared to those <50 years (p < 0.009), male compared to female (p < 0.054) and non-Saudi compared to Saudi (p < 0.003). Approximately 74% of all samples tested beyond 120 days were positive. Conclusion: Antibodies can persist in circulation for longer than 4 months after COVID-19 infection. The majority of patients with COVID-19 mounted humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection that strongly correlated with disease severity, older age and male gender. However, the population of individuals who tested negative should be further evaluated.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pediatric kidney transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection has been studied in immunocompetent children. However, data in the pediatric kidney transplant population (PKT) are lacking. METHODS: Using two commercial immunoassays that measured IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and IgG against the nucleocapsid (N) protein, we screened 72 PKT recipients who attended the outpatient clinic for routine blood work. The majority of patients with positive serology underwent an additional serology test at least once during subsequent clinical follow-up. Patients were confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 infection if they had two positive tests. RESULTS: Eight patients out of the 72 screened (11.1%) had positive results for SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in both serological tests. Of those who tested positive, 4 had positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR results before screening. All patients were asymptomatic or had a history of mild symptoms. All tested patients had persistently positive antibodies at a median follow-up time of 75 days (IQR, 44.5, 86.5 days). One patient had a positive PCR test at 75 days and a positive serology test at 120 days post infection. CONCLUSION: The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was relatively high (11.1%) in our population. Although all patients were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, they mounted a strong humoral immune response that persisted for a few months despite being on triple immunosuppressants. These findings have positive implications regarding vaccination efficacy in this group.

The novel allele, HLA-A*32:148, identified by next generation sequencing in a Saudi individual.

A single nucleotide substitution in exon 4 of HLA-A*32:01:01:01 results in novel HLA-A*32:148 allele.

Discrepant Antibody Testing Results: Which One to Believe?

The impact of solid-phase immunoassay for HLA antibody detection on the field of transplantation has been extremely significant by providing the most sensitive and precise method for characterization of HLA antibodies. However, despite all the benefits, technical limitations and inherent artifacts represent significant challenges, particularly with Luminex-based single-antigen bead (SAB) assay. Discordant results between antibody detection (screening assay) and identification (SAB) is not uncommon. Positive SAB assay in the context of negative screening testing is well documented and attributed to altered tertiary structure of HLA molecules exposing new epitopes or detection of naturally occurring antibodies. However, there are few reports that addressed the opposite scenario when negative SAB appeared in the context of positive screening assay. In such discrepant results, unmissed HLA antibody has to be excluded with certainty by other tests; however, with the availability of variable assays it may be difficult to choose the best combinations that clarify discrepancy without adding more confusion. Here we describe the results of correlation between 2 antibody screening solid-phase immunoassays (LABScreen Mixed using Luminex and FlowPRA Screen) on conventional flow cytometry and compare their outcomes with SAB and crossmatch results.

The dilemma of DQ HLA-antibodies.

Accurate identification of antibody reactivity against HLA-DQ antigens was difficult by using the old serological assays because of the strong linkage disequilibrium between HLA-DR and HLA-DQ (the usual inheritance of a certain HLA-DR molecule that ties together with the same DQ molecule within a racial group). The accurate and precise identifications of anti-HLA-antibodies of DQ specificities were made possible with the introduction of multiplex-bead arrays (Luminex), using single antigen bead (SAB) assay. The SAB assay is also considered today to be the most sensitive and specific method for alloimmunization assessment even for the low titer anti-HLA-antibodies. However, it is becoming clear that the detection of the HLA antibodies by SAB is not absolutely perfect due to the variation in densities, conformations and orientations of the antigen coated beads. Unlike HLA-DR, the HLA-DQ antigens are made of two polymorphic chains, both (alpha and beta chains) can contribute to the process of immunization individually or jointly. Routine SAB testing approach, which assigns the specificities based on beta chains and ignores the contribution of the DQα chains, can lead to erroneous DQ-antibody assignments. Therefore, it is important to recognize both the peculiarity of the HLA-DQ antigens as well as the nature of the assay format used in order to reach the correct antibody assignments. Erroneous donor specific antibodies (DSA) assignment may lead to denial of an otherwise immunologically compatible organ transplant, or exposing transplant recipients to unnecessary investigations or immunosuppression. The following two patients presented with HLA-antibodies against DQ antigens (anti-DQ-Abs) highlight these two scenarios.

How common is celiac disease in Eastern Saudi Arabia?

BACKGROUND: In contrast to its prevalence in Europe, celiac disease (CD) is considered rare in non-Caucasian populations. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of CD in clinically suspicious celiac disease patients and in patients with disorders known to be associated with CD, such as autoimmune diseases, using serological assay for IgA-endomysial antibodies (EMA) on inexpensive human tissue substrate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IgA-endomysial and IgA-reticulin antibodies (ARA) were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) study using human umbilical cord (HUC) and rat tissues, respectively, in the following groups: group 1, 145 patients with clinical suspicion of CD; group 2, 80 with autoimmune diseases; group 3, 20 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); and group 4, 100 healthy blood donors. RESULTS: Of the 145 patients with suspected CD (group 1), 11 were EMA positive with or without ARA, giving a serological prevalence of 7.6%. The histological findings of intestinal biopsy were confirmed in six of them, indicating a CD prevalence of 4%. In group 2, two EMA-positive (2.5%) with or without ARA cases were found. Both were from the 18 patients who had autoimmune thyroid disease, indicating an 11% prevalence of EMA in autoimmune thyroid disease. No positive EMA was detected in the 3rd and 4th groups, indicating 100% specificity. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed high prevalence of CD in a reference laboratory setting. This highlights the importance of keeping CD in mind and of promptly investigating suspected individuals. There is also a high prevalence of CD among patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases, and further studies are needed to elucidate the significance of this association. Test for endomysial antibodies using human umbilical cord is an inexpensive, easily available and highly specific tool for identifying patients to undergo biopsy and to screen at-risk groups of patients.