A novel algorithm increases the delivery of effective cardiac resynchronization therapy during atrial fibrillation: The CRTee randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) requires a high percentage of ventricular pacing (%Vp) to maximize its clinical benefits. Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown to reduce %Vp in CRT due to competition with irregular intrinsic atrioventricular (AV) conduction. We report the results of a prospective randomized crossover trial evaluating the amount of effective CRT delivered during AF with a novel algorithm (eCRTAF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether eCRTAF increases the amount of effective CRT delivered during AF compared to a currently available rate regularization algorithm. METHODS: Patients previously implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator and with a history of AF and intact AV conduction received up to 4 weeks of control (Conducted AF Response) and up to 4 weeks of eCRTAF in a randomized sequence. The percent effective CRT (%eCRT) pacing, which excludes beats without left ventricular capture, %Vp, and mean heart rate (HR) were recorded during AF and sinus rhythm. RESULTS: The eCRTAF algorithm resulted in a significantly higher %eCRT during AF than control (87.8% ± 7.8% vs 80.8% ± 14.3%; P <.001) and %Vp during AF than control (90.0% ± 5.9% vs 83.2% ± 11.9%; P <.001), with a small but statistically significant increase in mean HR of 2.5 bpm (79.5 ± 9.7 bpm vs 77.0 ± 9.9 bpm; P <.001). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of CRT patients with a history of AF, eCRTAF significantly increased %eCRT pacing and %Vp during AF with a small increase in mean HR. This algorithm may represent a novel noninvasive method of significantly increasing effective CRT delivery during AF, potentially improving CRT response.

The Gulf Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Registry: Rationale, Methodology, and Implementation.

BACKGROUND: The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is effective in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in high-risk patients. Little is known about ICD use in the Arabian Gulf. We designed a study to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving ICDs in the Arab Gulf region. METHODS: Gulf ICD is a prospective, multi-center, multinational, and observational study. All adult patients 18 years or older, receiving a de novo ICD implant and willing to sign a consent form will be eligible. Data on baseline characteristics, ICD indication, procedure and programing, in-hospital, and 1-year outcomes will be collected. Target enrollment is 1500 patients, which will provide adequate precision across a wide range of expected event rates. RESULTS: Fifteen centers in six countries are enrolling patients (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain, and Qatar). Two-thirds of the centers have dedicated electrophysiology laboratories, and in almost all centers ICDs are implanted exclusively by electrophysiologists. Nearly three-quarters of the centers reported annual ICD implant volumes of ≤150 devices, and pulse generator replacements constitute <30% of implants in the majority of centers. Enrollment started in December 2013, and accrual rate increased as more centers entered the study reaching an average of 98 patients per month. CONCLUSIONS: Gulf ICD is the first prospective, observational, multi-center, and multinational study of the characteristics and, the outcomes of patients receiving ICDs in the Arab Gulf region. The study will provide valuable insights into the utilization of and outcomes related to ICD therapy in the Gulf region.

Predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: the pivotal role of electrocardiogram.

Heart failure affects millions of patients all over the world, and its treatment is a major clinical challenge. Cardiac dyssynchrony is common among patients with advanced heart failure. Resynchronization therapy is a major advancement in heart failure management, but unfortunately not all patients respond to this therapy. Hence, many diagnostic tests have been used to predict the response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. In this paper we summarize the usefulness of different diagnostic modalities with special emphasis on the role of surface electrocardiogram as a major predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.