RESUMO
Pregnant women have a higher risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) compared to non-pregnant women, making antibiotics necessary for treatment. However, prescribing antibiotics without culture and sensitivity tests may contribute to antimicrobial resistance. A meta-analysis using R was conducted to determine the prevalence of antibiotic resistance patterns in UTIs among pregnant women. We identified observational studies published in the last 10 years and used a random effects model to calculate the pooled prevalence. The prevalence of Gram-negative organisms causing UTIs in pregnant women was 67 %, while Gram-positive organisms were 22 %. The burden of Gram-positive organisms exhibiting antimicrobial resistance was very high at 95 %, primarily to ampicillin. The most common Gram-negative organisms exhibiting antimicrobial resistance were E. coli, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while the most common Gram-positive organisms resistant to antibiotics were Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Sensitivity and culture testing are recommended for effective treatment in pregnant women with UTIs.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez , Infecções Urinárias , Humanos , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Feminino , Gravidez , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/microbiologia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificaçãoRESUMO
Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a well-known cause of bronchiolitis in children, can cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults, but this condition is not well studied. Hence, we described the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for CAP due to RSV. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients admitted to a tertiary-care hospital between 2016 and 2019 with CAP due to RSV diagnosed by a respiratory multiplex PCR within 48 hours of admission. We compared patients who required ICU admission to those who did not. Results: Eighty adult patients were hospitalized with CAP due to RSV (median age 69.0 years, hypertension 65.0%, diabetes 58.8%, chronic respiratory disease 52.5%, and immunosuppression 17.5%); 19 (23.8%) patients required ICU admission. The median pneumonia severity index score was 120.5 (140.0 for ICU and 102.0 for non-ICU patients; p = 0.09). Bacterial coinfection was rare (10.0%). Patients who required ICU admission had more hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) and a higher prevalence of bilateral infiltrates on chest X-ray (CXR) (89.5% versus 32.7%; p < 0.001). Systemic corticosteroids were used in 57.3% of patients (median initial dose was 40 mg of prednisone equivalent) with ICU patients receiving a higher dose compared to non-ICU patients (p = 0.02). Most (68.4%) ICU patients received mechanical ventilation (median duration of 4 days). The overall hospital mortality was 8.8% (higher for ICU patients: 31.6% versus 1.6%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Most patients with CAP due to RSV were elderly and had significant comorbidities. ICU admission was required in almost one in four patients and was associated with higher mortality.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
Background Antibiotics significantly increased life expectancy and decreased mortality rates due to infections. However, this trend is starting to fade with the rise of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDR); these strains are becoming a global burden on healthcare and the economy. The dramatic increase and spread of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) has become a serious global public health concern. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we aimed to estimate the rates of gram-negative bacteremia in five tertiary care hospitals in different geographical locations in Saudi Arabia for five years. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in five tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia among patients with bacteremia due to CRGNB. Electronic medical records were used to retrieve data regarding patient demographics and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) over five years between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients with positive blood cultures for carbapenem-resistant Escherichia (E.) coli, Klebsiella (K.) pneumonia, Pseudomonas (P.) aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter (A.) baumannii comprise the final study population. Results This retrospective multicentric study was conducted between 2016 and 2020 in five tertiary care hospitals across five cities in Saudi Arabia. E. coli (n=2190, 38.03%), K. pneumoniae (n=2154, 37.41%), P. aeruginosa (n = 918, 15.94%), and A. baumannii (n=496, 8.61%) constitute the 5758 gram-negative bacteria isolates. E. coli was the most frequently identified species in Riyadh, AlAhsa, Dammam, and Madinah (40%, 46.50%, 61.67%, and 43.66%, respectively), with a p-value of (p<0.001), except in Jeddah, where K. pneumoniae was the most prevalent (42%). The mean age of patients across Riyadh, AlAhsa, Dammam, and Madinah was 62.2 years (± 4.24). In contrast to Jeddah, where the majority of isolates (702; 41.8%) belonged to the adult age group. Most isolates were from male patients (3045; 52.9%), compared to 2713 (47.1%) from female patients. K. pneumoniae 1226 (40.3%) was the most prevalent isolate among male patients while E. coli (1135; 41.8%) was the most prevalent isolate among female patients. Conclusion Our study showed that the prevalence of carbapenem non-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria is relatively high, which therefore makes them very challenging to treat. The results show an urgent need for improved antibiotic stewardship strategies, including better surveillance and more effective infection control measures to reduce this issue. Further research into the molecular epidemiology and risk factors associated with these infections is necessary to guide public health policymakers in developing interventions to help control the spread of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
RESUMO
The objective of this study is to examine the IgG antibody response in critically ill patients with the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and to examine the association of early antibody response with mortality and viral clearance. We collected blood samples from 40 consecutive real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) confirmed critically ill MERS patients on ICU days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 28. MERS-CoV antibodies were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), using wells coated with MERS-CoV S1 antigen. Patients were admitted to ICU after a median (Q1, Q3) of 9 (4, 13) days from onset of symptoms with an admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 11 (6.5, 12). Among the study cohort, 38 patients (95%) received invasive ventilation, 35 (88%) vasopressors, 21 (53%) renal replacement therapy and 17 (43%) corticosteroids. Median (Q1,Q3) ELISA optical density (OD) ratio significantly increased with time (p < 0.001) from 0.11 (0.07, 1.43) on day 1; to 0.69 (0.11, 2.08) on day 3, 2.72 (1.84, 3.54) on day 7, 2.51 (0.35, 3.35) on day 14 and 3.77 (3.70, 3.84) on day 28. Early antibody response (day 1-3) was observed in 13/39 patients (33%) and was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio: 0.31, 95% CI 0.10, 0.96, p = 0.04) but was not associated with faster clearance of MERS-CoV RNA. In conclusion, among critically ill patients with MERS, early antibody response was associated with lower mortality but not with faster clearance of MERS-CoV RNA. These findings have important implications for understanding pathogenesis and potential immunotherapy.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Coronavírus da Síndrome Respiratória do Oriente Médio/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Formação de Anticorpos , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Cinética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escores de Disfunção Orgânica , Terapia de Substituição Renal , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NFGNB) is increasingly recognized as urgent healthcare threat. Trend data on AMR of NFGNB in Saudi Arabia are either old or limited. The objective was to estimate the prevalence and resistance trends of isolated NFGNB in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study involving seven tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia was conducted between 2011 and 2016. Susceptibility testing for non-duplicate isolates was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines in College of American Pathologists accredited diagnostic microbiology laboratories in the participating hospitals. RESULTS: Out of 461,274 isolates, 100,132 (21.7%) were NFGNB which represented 30% of gram-negative pathogens. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common (73.6%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (21.0%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.3%). Resistance trends of P. aeruginosa were increasing for aztreonam (absolute increase during the study was 17.3%), imipenem (12.3%), and meropenem (11.6%). A. baumannii was fully resistant to several beta lactam drugs, and resistance trends were increasing for potential treatments such as tigecycline (25.1%) and tobramycin (15.5%). S. maltophilia was >90% resistant to trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin by the end of the study. CONCLUSION: We are reporting high and/or increasing resistance of NFGNB to common treatment options. The current findings call for urgent actions to combat the increasing resistance of NFGNB. Large scale sharing of AMR data collected at different hospitals with the Saudi AMR committee would be critical to set priorities and monitor progress.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Estudos Retrospectivos , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Antiviral drugs have shown limited effectiveness in treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to assess the effects of a favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine combination on treating moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients. METHODS: An investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial at nine hospitals. Eligible patients were adults with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 defined as oxygen saturation (SaO2) of ≤ 94% while breathing ambient air or significant clinical symptoms with chest x-ray changes requiring hospital admission. Randomization was in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard care (control group) or standard care plus favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine. The primary outcome was time to clinical improvement of two points (from the status at randomization) on a seven-category ordinal scale or live discharge from the hospital within 14 days. Analyses were done in an intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: From May 2020 to Jan 2021, 254 patients were enrolled; 129 were assigned to standard of care and 125 to the treatment. The mean age was 52 (± 13) years, and 103 (41%) were women. At randomization, six patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation, 229 (90.15%) were requiring supplemental oxygen only (with or without non-invasive ventilation), and 19 (7.48%) were receiving neither. The time to clinical improvement was not significantly different between the groups: median of 9 days in the treatment group and 7 days in the control group (HR: 0.845; 95% CI 0.617-1.157; p-value = 0.29). The 28-day mortality was not significantly different between the groups (7.63% treatment) vs. (10.32% control); p-value = 0.45. The most prevalent adverse events were headache, elevation in ALT, and the prolonged QTc interval in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: The combination of favipiravir and hydroxychloroquine did not result in a statistically significant clinical benefit in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04392973).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients is critical to co-manage their underlying disease and infection appropriately. Our study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of screening patients with cancer for COVID-19 infection. METHODS: All oncology patients receiving care at Department of Oncology at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh were screened using the acute respiratory infection (ARI) survey. Nasopharyngeal and throat swap for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was performed on patients who have high ARI score (i.e. ≥ 4), or any patient requiring elective/emergency hospitalization, undergoing a procedure as well as screening asymptomatic patients receiving chemotherapy between April 1st and July 30, 2020. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Descriptive and inferential analyses were done and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated considering the COVID-19 PCR as the gold standard. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 473 patients were included with a median age was 56 years (14-104), 51% were female, 73% had solid tumors, and 66% received treatment within the last 3 months. These patients underwent 688 PCR tests along with ARI survey screening. Testing was done in the outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department setting in 41%, 40% and 19% of the patients, respectively. Majority of tests were screening of asymptomatic patients and only 23% were tested for suspected infections with ARI ≥ 4. A total of 54 patients (8%) had positive PCR for COVID-19 infection. The prevalence of infection varied from month to month ranging from 1.09% in April up to 19.70% in June and correlated with the average daily and active case load at a national level. The diagnostic yield of the ARI score also correlated with infection burden nationally. The PPV and NPV of the ARI as a screening tool was 18.24% (0-31.8) and 95.6% (86.36-98.86%) with the PPN fluctuating considerably in parallel with the prevalence of COVID-19 result. Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity of the ARI were 55.77% (0-70.59) and 79.4 (69.19-92), respectively. CONCLUSION: The yield of screening asymptomatic patients with cancer varies based on the community burden of COVID-19 infection. As universal screening can cause delays to patient care, it should be tailored based on the individual patient risks and infection burden in the region.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 was first identified in Wuhan, China. All ages are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Few studies had reported milder course in children however, severe course of illness has been reported. We aimed to describe the clinical features of COVID-19 in pediatric patients including diagnostic findings and therapeutic interventions in sever disease manifestation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 742 patients with SARS-CoV-2 proven infection at King Abdullah Specialist Children's Hospital, from April 2020 and July 2020. Inpatients, outpatient, including those with sever manifestation treated at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were included. We collected data including demographic data, comorbidities, symptoms, imaging data, laboratory findings, treatments and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: Among of 742 patients, 71 (9.6%) were hospitalized. The median age of patients was 75 months old and 53.6 were male. A total of 461 (62.1%) had close contact with confirmed cases, 45 (6.1%) had no contact history, and 236 (31.8%) with unknown exposure risk. The most common symptoms at the onset of illness were fever (32.5%), respiratory symptoms (21%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (10.3%). Among the entire cohort, 7 patients were admitted to PICU with COVID-19 related symptoms, five patients diagnosed with MIS-C, one patient with Kawasaki, and one patient with pneumonia. All patients received supportive therapy, no antiviral treatment had been used however, in MIS-C patients IVIG had been given to all patients, five patients received Anakinra; and one patient received tocilizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, children infected with SARS-CoV-2 are less likely to develop symptomatic or serious diseases. Among symptomatic children, the most common clinical features were fever and respiratory symptoms followed by gastrointestinal manifestations. The majority of infected children have reported contact with an infected individual. MIS-C associated with COVID-19 is a severe presentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection and of a major concern as an overlapping features with other diseases could happen, making the diagnosis challenging.
Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Bloodstream infection among hospitalized patients is associated with serious adverse outcomes. Blood culture is routinely ordered in patients with suspected infections, although 90% of blood cultures do not show any growth of organisms. The evidence regarding the prediction of bacteremia is scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of blood cultures requested for a cohort of admitted patients between 2017 and 2019 was undertaken. Several machine-learning models were used to identify the best prediction model. Additionally, univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the predictive factors for bacteremia. RESULTS: A total of 36,405 blood cultures of 7157 patients were done. There were 2413 (6.62%) positive blood cultures. The best prediction was by using NN with the high specificity of 88% but low sensitivity. There was a statistical difference in the following factors: longer admission days before the blood culture, presence of a central line, and higher lactic acid-more than 2 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: Despite the low positive rate of blood culture, machine learning could predict positive blood culture with high specificity but minimum sensitivity. Yet, the SIRS score, qSOFA score, and other known factors were not good prognostic factors. Further improvement and training would possibly enhance machine-learning performance.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading nosocomial Gram-negative bacteria associated with prolonged hospitalization, and increased morbidity and mortality. Limited data exist regarding P. aeruginosa infection and outcome in patients managed in intensive care units (ICUs) in the Gulf countries. We aimed to determine the risk factors, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and patient outcomes of P. aeruginosa infection in ICU. METHODS: In this matched case-control study, all P. aeruginosa infections that occurred >48 h after hospital admission between January 31st 2016 and December 31st 2018 at ICUs affiliated with King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh were included. P. aeruginosa was identified using MALDI-TOF (Vitek-MS) by biomérieux, and the antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using an automated biomérieux VITEK®ï¸ 2 Antimicrobial Susceptibility card. RESULTS: The study included 90 cases and 90 controls. Compared with controls, cases had significantly higher mean ICU stay and higher proportions with previous history of antimicrobial therapy, coronary artery disease, malignancy, hemodialysis, previous surgery, use of central line, urethral catheterization, nasogastric tube, and tracheostomy. In a multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis, factors independently associated with P. aeruginosa infection were ICU duration [Odds Ratio (OR) 9.05, 95%CI 2.53-32.27, p = .001], previous surgery (OR = 7.33, 95%CI 1.66-32.36, p = .009), tracheostomy (OR = 11.13, 95%CI 1.05-118.59, p = .046), urethral catheterization (OR = 7.38, 95%CI 1.21-45.11, p = .030) and use of aminoglycosides (OR = 10.59, 95%CI 1.14-98.13, p = .038). Approximately 41% of P. aeruginosa isolates were resistant to imipenem, while 36.7% were multidrug-resistant. Mortality was similar in both groups: 54(60%) cases and 51(56.7%) controls; p = .650. CONCLUSIONS: The study identifies several potentially modifiable factors associated with P. aeruginosa infection in ICUs. Identification of these factors could facilitate case identification and enhance control measures.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Infecção Hospitalar , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/epidemiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe local experience in managing an outbreak of Candida auris in a tertiary-care setting. METHODS: In response to emerging Candida auris, an outbreak investigation was conducted at our hospital between March 2018 and June 2019. Once a patient was confirmed to have Candida auris, screening of exposed patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) was conducted. Postexposure screening included those who had had direct contact with or shared the same unit or ward with a laboratory-confirmed case. In response to the increasing number of cases, new infection control measures were implemented. RESULTS: In total, 23 primary patients were detected over 15 months. Postexposure screening identified 11 more cases, and all were patients. Furthermore, ~28.6% of patients probably caught infection in another hospital or in the community. Infection control measures were strictly implemented including hand hygiene, personal protective equipment, patient hygiene, environmental cleaning, cohorting of patients and HCWs, and avoiding the sharing of equipment. The wave reached a peak in April 2019, followed by a sharp decrease in May 2019 and complete clearance in June 2019. The case patients were equally distributed between intensive care units (51.4%) and wards (48.6%). More infections (62.9%) occurred than colonizations (37.1%). Urinary tract infection (42.9%) and candidemia (17.1%) were the main infections. In total, 7 patients (20.0%) died during hospitalization; among them, 6 (17.1%) died within 30 days of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Active screening of exposed patients followed by strict infection control measures, including environmental cleaning, was successful in ending the outbreak. Preventing future outbreaks is challenging due to outside sources of infection and environmental resistance.
Assuntos
Candida , Candidemia , Candidemia/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Whether combined treatment with recombinant interferon beta-1b and lopinavir-ritonavir reduces mortality among patients hospitalized with Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, adaptive, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled patients at nine sites in Saudi Arabia. Hospitalized adults with laboratory-confirmed MERS were randomly assigned to receive recombinant interferon beta-1b plus lopinavir-ritonavir (intervention) or placebo for 14 days. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality, with a one-sided P-value threshold of 0.025. Prespecified subgroup analyses and safety analyses were conducted. Because of the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019, the data and safety monitoring board requested an unplanned interim analysis and subsequently recommended the termination of enrollment and the reporting of the results. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were enrolled; 43 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 52 to the placebo group. A total of 12 patients (28%) in the intervention group and 23 (44%) in the placebo group died by day 90. The analysis of the primary outcome, with accounting for the adaptive design, yielded a risk difference of -19 percentage points (upper boundary of the 97.5% confidence interval [CI], -3; one-sided P = 0.024). In a prespecified subgroup analysis, treatment within 7 days after symptom onset led to lower 90-day mortality than use of placebo (relative risk, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.75), whereas later treatment did not. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 patients (9%) in the intervention group and in 10 (19%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of recombinant interferon beta-1b and lopinavir-ritonavir led to lower mortality than placebo among patients who had been hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed MERS. The effect was greatest when treatment was started within 7 days after symptom onset. (Funded by the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; MIRACLE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02845843.).
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon beta-1b/uso terapêutico , Lopinavir/uso terapêutico , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Interferon beta-1b/efeitos adversos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Lopinavir/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ritonavir/efeitos adversos , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Tempo para o TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Invasive candidiasis is not uncommon in critically ill patients but has variable epidemiology and outcomes between intensive care units (ICUs). This study evaluated the epidemiology, characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with invasive candidiasis at 6 ICUs of 2 tertiary care centers. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of all adults admitted to 6 ICUs in 2 different hospitals between August 2012 and May 2016 and diagnosed to have invasive candidiasis by 2 intensivists according to predefined criteria. The epidemiology of isolated Candida and the characteristics, management, and outcomes of affected patients were studied. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of non-albicans versus albicans infection and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Invasive candidiasis was diagnosed in 162 (age 58.4 ± 18.9 years, 52.2% males, 82.1% medical admissions, and admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 24.1 ± 8.4) patients at a rate of 2.6 cases per 100 ICU admissions. On the diagnosis day, the Candida score was 2.4 ± 0.9 in invasive candidiasis compared with 1.6 ± 0.9 in Candida colonization (P < .01). The most frequent species were albicans (38.3%), tropicalis (16.7%), glabrata (16%), and parapsilosis (13.6%). In patients with candidemia, antifungal therapy was started on average 1 hour before knowing the culture result (59.6% of therapy initiated after). Resistance to fluconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B occurred in 27.9%, 2.9%, and 3.1%, respectively. The hospital mortality was 58.6% with no difference between albicans and non-albicans infections (61.3% and 54.9%, respectively; P = .44). The independent predictors of mortality were renal replacement therapy after invasive candidiasis diagnosis (odds ratio: 5.42; 95% confidence interval: 2.16-13.56) and invasive candidiasis leading/contributing to ICU admission versus occurring during critical illness (odds ratio: 2.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.22-6.74). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis, non-albicans was responsible for most cases, and mortality was high (58.6%). Antifungal therapy was initiated after culture results in 60% suggesting low preclinical suspicion. Study registration: NCT01490684; registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on February 11, 2012.
Assuntos
Candida/isolamento & purificação , Candidíase Invasiva/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Candidíase Invasiva/parasitologia , Resultados de Cuidados Críticos , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Infecção Hospitalar/parasitologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
We report the complete genome sequence of a colistin-resistant strain of uropathogenic Escherichia coli, isolated in January 2013 at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The isolate (named SA186) was sequence type 131 (ST131) and belonged to serotype O25b-H4 and clade B (fimH22).
RESUMO
Despite low infectious potential of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB), it poses significant clinical challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Understanding the main demographical risk factors for disease characteristics of EPTB plays a crucial role in speeding up diagnosis process and improving overall clinical experience. The aim of this study was to investigate the main demographical and clinical risk factors for EPTB among adults and adolescents for the first time in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional multicenter study was carried out on a collection of 902 extrapulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) isolates with demographical and clinical data. All isolates were subjected to spoligotyping and 24-loci based MIRU-VNTR typing. The association between two potential variables was assessed using odd ratios (OR) calculations. Independent risk factors for EPTB and diseases characteristics of EPTB were identified using multivariate regression model analyses. Gender was found to be significantly associated with lymph node, gastrointestinal, central nervous system and urogenital TB. Lymph node TB showed statistical association to age group below 25 years, non-Saudis and South East Asian ethnicity. While gastrointestinal TB demonstrated an association with patients above 60 years old, and Saudis. Multivariate analysis showed that gender is an independent risk factor to urogenital TB (p 0.03) and lymph node TB (p 0.005). On the other hands, South Asian (p 0.01) and South East Asian (p 0.03) ethnicities were both identified as independent risk factors significantly associated with EPTB. MTBC lineages, site of infections, gender, HIV and smear positivity showed no significant association. Nationwide qualitative-studies are highly warranted in the future to further understand the main demographic risk factors for disease characteristics of EPTB.
Assuntos
Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Sistema Nervoso Central/microbiologia , Estudos Transversais , Demografia , Feminino , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Humanos , Linfonodos/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Fatores Sexuais , Tuberculose Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Tuberculose Pulmonar/etiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection usually presents with a wide range of manifestations. Although HIV patients are prone to pulmonary infections by opportunistic pathogens in the late stage of AIDS, manifesting the disease with pulmonary infections caused by Mycobacterium riyadhense (newly identified non-tuberculous mycobacteria) is extremely rare with only one case reported in the literature. We are describing two previously healthy patients who presented with M. riyadhense lung infection and were subsequently found to have HIV, illustrating the need for considering the possibility M. riyadhense lung infection as a presenting illness of HIV.
Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/diagnóstico , Mycobacterium/classificação , Mycobacterium/isolamento & purificação , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/microbiologia , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/patologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/microbiologia , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/patologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Pneumonia Bacteriana/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Growing evidences suggested that the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) lineages can determine the clinical outcome of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. However, limited data only available revealing such association of bacterial genotypes and clinical phenotypes from immigrant rich countries. METHODS: A multicenter study has been carried out on a collection of 2092 (1003 extrapulmonary and 1089 pulmonary) MTBC isolates. Genotyping of all the isolates were carried out by spoligotyping and 24 loci based MIRU-VNTR typing. RESULTS: Demographically domination of young Saudi nationals (61.4%) and men (61.2%) were found in this cohort. Lymph nodes (62.4%) and gastrointestinal sites (16.7%) were the most common anatomical sites of infection. The predominant lineages were Delhi/CAS (26.9%), EAI (14.2%) and Ghana (9.9%). Mycobacterium africanum type I and II were reported for the first time in the country among extrapulmonary cases. 'Ancestral' lineages M.bovis (OR-5.22; 95% CI-2.23-8.22, p- < 0.001) and Delhi/CAS (OR-0.57; 95% CI-0.411-0.734, p- < 0.001) were directly associated with lymph node tuberculosis and gastrointestinal tuberculosis (M. bovis-OR-0.33; 95% CI-0.085-0.567, p-0.001 and Delhi/CAS-OR-1.87; 95% CI-1.22-2.53, p- < 0.001) respectively. Among the 'Modern' lineages, EAI showed significant association to central nervous system tuberculosis (OR-1.98; 95% CI-0.76-3.19, p-0.04) and Uganda-I to gastrointestinal tuberculosis (OR-2.41; 95% CI-0.77-4.06, p-0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The findings substantially contribute to the emerging evidences that MTBC lineages influence disease phenotypes and epidemiological consequences.
Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Fenótipo , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Tuberculose/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Linhagem da Célula/genética , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Filogenia , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), a highly lethal respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus (MERS-CoV), is an emerging disease with high potential for epidemic spread. It has been listed by the WHO and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) as an important target for vaccine development. While initially the majority of MERS cases were hospital acquired, continued emergence of MERS is attributed to community acquisition, with camels likely being the direct or indirect source. However, the majority of patients do not describe camel exposure, making the route of transmission unclear. Here, using sensitive immunological assays and a cohort of camel workers (CWs) with well-documented camel exposure, we show that approximately 50% of camel workers (CWs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and 0% of controls were previously infected. We obtained blood samples from 30 camel herders, truck drivers, and handlers with well-documented camel exposure and from healthy donors, and measured MERS-CoV-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and neutralizing antibody titers, as well as T cell responses. Totals of 16/30 CWs and 0/30 healthy control donors were seropositive by MERS-CoV-specific ELISA and/or neutralizing antibody titer, and an additional four CWs were seronegative but contained virus-specific T cells in their blood. Although virus transmission from CWs has not been formally demonstrated, a possible explanation for repeated MERS outbreaks is that CWs develop mild disease and then transmit the virus to uninfected individuals. Infection of some of these individuals, such as those with comorbidities, results in severe disease and in the episodic appearance of patients with MERS.IMPORTANCE The Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a coronavirus (CoV)-mediated respiratory disease. Virus transmission occurs within health care settings, but cases also appear sporadically in the community. Camels are believed to be the source for community-acquired cases, but most patients do not have camel exposure. Here, we assessed whether camel workers (CWs) with high rates of exposure to camel nasal and oral secretions had evidence of MERS-CoV infection. The results indicate that a high percentage of CWs were positive for virus-specific immune responses but had no history of significant respiratory disease. Thus, a possible explanation for repeated MERS outbreaks is that CWs develop mild or subclinical disease. These CWs then transmit the virus to uninfected individuals, some of whom are highly susceptible, develop severe disease, and are detected as primary MERS cases in the community.