Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 242, 2024 May 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806755

RESUMO

Meningioma is the most common type of primary brain tumor which presents with a variety of neurological manifestations. Surgical resection tends to be the preferred treatment. The occurrence of seizures after resection is common, which occur either early, within seven days of operation, or late. Our meta-analysis investigated the possible predictors of early and late postoperative seizures. We assessed the relevant observational studies on predictors of postoperative seizures published in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2000 to September 2022, and those that met inclusion criteria were included. We calculated the association between potential predicting factors and postoperative seizures, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) applying either random or fixed-effect models. The early and late postoperative seizures were evaluated individually. Thirteen observational studies involving 4176 patients were included. Seizures occurred in 250 (6%) and 584 (14%) patients, respectively, in the early and late postoperative phases. Shared predictors for early and late seizures included tumors involving the motor cortex (OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.67-4.38, OR = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.68-3.61), postoperative neurological deficit (OR = 4.68; 95% CI: 2.67-8.22, OR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.39-2.92), and preoperative seizures (OR = 2.52; 95% CI: 1.82-3.49, OR = 4.35; 95% CI: 3.29-5.75). Peritumoral edema (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.49-2.64) was a significant factor only among late postoperative seizure patients while surgical complications (OR = 3.77; 95% CI: 2.39-5.93) was a significant factor solely for early postoperative seizures. Meningioma patients commonly experience early and late postoperative seizures. Identifying predictors of postoperative seizures is essential to diagnose and manage them effectively.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Convulsões , Meningioma/cirurgia , Humanos , Convulsões/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos
2.
Life (Basel) ; 14(2)2024 Jan 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38398706

RESUMO

The treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is rapidly evolving with the recent approvals of poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Already part of the therapeutic armamentarium in different types of advanced cancers, these molecules have shaped a new era in mPCa by targeting genomic pathways altered in these patients, leading to promising responses. These agents act by inhibiting poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) enzymes involved in repairing single-strand breaks in the DNA. Based on the PROfound and TRITON3 trials, olaparib and rucaparib were respectively approved as monotherapy in pretreated patients with mCRPC and alterations in prespecified genes. The combinations of olaparib with abiraterone (PROpel) and niraparib with abiraterone (MAGNITUDE) were approved as first-line options in patients with mCRPC and alterations in BRCA1/2, whereas the combination of talazoparib with enzalutamide (TALAPRO-2) was approved in the same setting in patients with alterations in any of the HRR genes, which are found in around a quarter of patients with advanced prostate cancer. Additional trials are already underway to assess these agents in an earlier hormone-sensitive setting. Future directions will include refining the treatment sequencing in patients with mCRPC in the clinic while taking into account the financial toxicity as well as the potential side effects encountered with these therapies and elucidating their mechanism of action in patients with non-altered HRR genes. Herein, we review the biological rationale behind using PARPis in mCRPC and the key aforementioned clinical trials that paved the way for these approvals.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA