Medium-Term Results of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy from a Single High-Volume Center.

AIM: Clinical practice is moving away from treating meniscal tears in patients with osteoarthritis unless there are mechanical symptoms. This study assessed the risk of needing further surgery for osteoarthritis in the 5 years following partial meniscectomy in different age groups and different grades of knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: All partial meniscectomies were performed by the senior author during a 31-month period. Data were collected and analyzed retrospectively using electronic patients' records and imaging database. Patients who had previous arthroscopy, anterior cruciate ligament pathology, discoid meniscus or were less than 34 years old were excluded from the study. Range of follow-up was 3 to 5 years. Osteoarthritis was classified intra-operatively using the Outerbridge classification. Knees that needed further surgical treatment in the form of joint replacement or osteotomy were considered as failures. The population was split into three groups according to their age (35-54, 55-64 and 65+). Survival analysis was calculated using the life table method. RESULTS: 207 knees were included. In the 35-54 age group, patients with no/mild OA had a survival rate of 97.59% and the severe OA group had a survival rate of 73.5%. In the 55-64 age group, these figures were 100% and 73.6%, respectively. In the >65 age group, the survival rates were 100% and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that patients with no/mild OA should be considered for APM. Patient's with meniscal tears and severe OA should be counseled on the outcomes and risks of further surgery after an APM.

Outcome of revision arthroplasty for failed metal-on-metal total hip replacements; is there a relation with metal ions?

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the early outcome following revision arthroplasty for failed metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements (THR) due to adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD). METHODS: We reviewed 106 consecutive revision arthroplasties. Case notes and radiological investigations were reviewed to assess the complications. Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Euroqol (EQ-5D-3L) scores were used to assess the functional outcome and improvement of quality of life. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 20 months (12-48 months), the mean OHS was 28.7. Pain improved in 61% patients. A majority of patients were in level 2 for all the EQ-5D-3L dimensions. The overall complication rate was 16%. Survivorship free from further revision for any cause was 94.3% at 48 months. There was no correlation between pre-revision blood metal ions and the final outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Revision surgery for failed MoM hip replacement due to ARMD is associated with a relatively higher rate of complications and risk of chronic pain. There is poor correlation between serum metal ions and development of ARMD and outcome following revision surgery.

Adverse reaction to metal bearing leading to femoral stem fractures: a literature review and report of two cases.

Metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing in total hip replacement (THR) has a high failure rate due to adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD). There is a spectrum of soft tissue and bony changes in ARMD including muscle necrosis and osteolysis. In our institution, more than 1500 MoM THRs were implanted since 2003. Recently, we have revised significant numbers of these. We report our experience and management of a mode of failure of MoM THR that has been infrequently reported-the distal femoral stem fracture. We report on two patients who presented with worsening pain attributable to fracture of the femoral stem. Severe femoral osteolysis led to loss of proximal stem support and eventual fatigue fracture of the component. Both patients were revised employing a posterior approach. Bone trephine was used to extract a well-fixed distal stem fragment without any windows. Both patients had successful outcome after revision with excellent pain relief and no complications.