RESUMO
Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) doubles the morbidity of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and leads to a 50% increase in mortality compared to the general population. This study aims to estimate the CVD incidence among RA patients in Saudi Arabia (SA), vital for assessing CVD burdens within this group. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study took place at two centers in the Eastern Province of SA, including all adult RA patients who visited the rheumatology clinic from 2016 to 2021 and were prescribed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). CVD incidence was determined by the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD), stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), venous thromboembolism (VTE), heart failure (HF), and arrhythmia post-RA diagnosis. Additional data collected included demographics, CVD risk factors, comorbidities, RA-related factors, and medication usage. Results: The study comprised 651 patients, 80.5% of whom were females with an average age of 51. The overall CVD incidence was 11.2 per 1000 person-years, with males experiencing five times more incidents than females. The prevalence of CVD risk factors included 18.7% with hypertension, 7.8% with hyperlipidemia, 18.9% with diabetes, and 42.9% with obesity. Significant predictors of CVD were male gender and RA duration, with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of 3.17 (95% CI 1.10 to 9.14, P=0.033) and 64.81 (95% CI 3.68 to 1140.6, P=0.004), respectively. Conclusion: This unique study from SA examined the CVD incidence in RA patients, identifying long disease duration and male gender as significant predictors. Effective reduction of CVD risk in RA patients requires aggressive management of modifiable risk factors and regular risk assessments.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) patients are at risk of thrombosis. Literature that compares the effectiveness of enoxaparin to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in COVID-19 patients is scarce. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of enoxaparin compared with UFH when used at their standard/intermediate dosing in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a large COVID-19 center located in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Confirmed COVID-19 cases (≥18 years old) admitted between January and December 2020 were randomly screened for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation, on chronic anticoagulation, had active bleeding, a platelet count <25 × 109/L, or an incomplete electronic file. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of any thrombotic event (pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, stroke, or myocardial infarction) or mortality. Secondary endpoints were major or minor bleeding. We applied inverse propensity score weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis to analyze the primary endpoint. Logistic regression was used for the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 980 patients were included (enoxaparin, n = 470 and UFH, n = 510) with a mean age (±SD) of 47.7 (± 12.3) for the enoxaparin arm and 52 (±13.9) for the UFH arm. There was a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.46 (95%CI: 0.22 to 0.96, P = 0.039) in favor of the enoxaparin arm. There was no statistically significant difference in major or minor bleeding rates between the two arms. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: When compared with UFH, enoxaparin was associated with a significant reduction in thrombotic events or mortality among COVID-19 patients. The results need confirmation from randomized controlled trials.