Selective internal radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A 15-year multicenter Australian cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The exact place for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in the therapeutic algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is debated. There are limited data on its indications, efficacy, and safety in Australia. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing SIRT for HCC in all Sydney hospitals between 2005 and 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival and adverse events. RESULTS: During the study period, 156 patients underwent SIRT across 10 institutions (mean age 67 years, 81% male). SIRT use progressively increased from 2005 (n = 2), peaking in 2017 (n = 42) before declining (2019: n = 21). Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages at treatment were A (13%), B (33%), C (52%), and D (2%). Forty-four (28%) patients had tumor thrombus. After a median follow-up of 13.9 months, there were 117 deaths. Median overall survival was 15 months (95% confidence interval 11-19). Independent predictors of mortality on multivariable analysis were extent of liver involvement, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, baseline ascites, alpha fetoprotein, and model for end-stage liver disease score. Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% confidence interval 5.1-6.9 months). Following SIRT, 11% of patients were downstaged to curative therapy. SIRT-related complications occurred in 17%: radioembolization-induced liver disease (11%), pneumonitis (3%), gastrointestinal ulceration, and cholecystitis (1% each). Baseline ascites predicted for radioembolization-induced liver disease. CONCLUSION: We present the largest Australian SIRT cohort for HCC. We have identified several factors associated with a poor outcome following SIRT. Patients with early-stage disease had the best survival with some being downstaged to curative therapy.

The importance and impact of recognizing metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) can develop in any patient, including those with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The recently proposed diagnostic criteria for MAFLD provide a unique opportunity to investigate the impact of concomitant fatty liver in patients with another established cause for their liver disease. The objective of our study was to assess the characteristics and outcomes of patients with a dual etiology liver disease. METHODS: We evaluated 1181 patients including 744 with CHC and 437 with MAFLD. All patients in both cohorts underwent liver biopsy indicating disease activity and fibrosis stage. RESULTS: Nearly half (43.1%) the patients with CHC had concomitant MAFLD. Comparing patients with CHC alone with those with a dual etiology disease, we found that the latter had more severe liver injury, hepatic inflammation and fibrosis (all P < 0.001). Interestingly, lean or normal-weight patients with CHC and MAFLD had a similar fibrosis stage compared to the two other subgroups of MAFLD (obesity and/or diabetes mellitus). There was no statistical significance in hepatic steatosis and fibrosis between genotype 3 CHC and MAFLD group compared to other genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CHC and concomitant MAFLD had more severe liver disease than those with viral hepatitis alone. Recognizing coexisting MAFLD in patients with CHC is important for the delivery of holistic care.