Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ESMO Open ; 9(4): 102386, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507897

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have not been shown to be active in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), with response rates <5%. Lenvatinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor which binds to vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptors and has demonstrated efficacy in pancreatic and gastrointestinal NETs [44% and 16% objective radiographic response rate (ORR), respectively]. The combination of antiangiogenic and CPI therapies can be synergistic. We therefore evaluated the combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in well-differentiated gastrointestinal (GI) and thoracic NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, phase II trial evaluated patients with advanced GI/thoracic NETs (pancreatic NETs were excluded due to high response rate of lenvatinib monotherapy in this patient population), with evidence of progression within 8 months of study entry and at least two prior lines of systemic therapy. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or progression of disease. Primary endpoint was objective response rate, and an interim analysis was planned once 20 patients were enrolled. Four ORRs were required to continue enrollment. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled on protocol from April 2021 to January 2022 (nine small intestine, five lung, two thymic, two unknown primary, one cecal, one presacral primaries). Two patients (10%) achieved a partial response (atypical lung and small intestinal primaries). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8 months (95% confidence interval 5.8-10.2 months). Twelve (60%) patients experienced probably or definitely associated grade 3 adverse events (10 hypertension). Fourteen patients (70%) required dose reductions or discontinued one of the medications. Two patients discontinued treatment before radiographic assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib did not show sufficient response in patients with NETs to warrant continued enrollment on trial.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Compostos de Fenilureia , Quinolinas , Humanos , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/farmacologia , Masculino , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/farmacologia , Feminino , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia
2.
ESMO Open ; 7(1): 100364, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34973511

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dual checkpoint inhibitor therapy with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 therapy has shown promising results in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), demonstrating varying response rates of 9%-44%. More data are needed to evaluate the true response in a real-world cohort of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with high-grade NENs treated at the Moffitt Cancer Center and Mayo Clinic between September 2017 and July 2020 who received combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients met the eligibility criteria. Patients had received an average of two prior lines of therapy, including at least one cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen. Twenty-seven (79.4%) patients had poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and seven (20.6%) had well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors. The most common primary site (10, 29.4%) was pancreas; other primary sites of disease included colon (n = 5), endometrium (n = 3), anorectum (n = 2), esophagus (n = 2), cervix (n = 1), stomach (n = 1), small intestine (n = 1), and unknown primary (n = 9). Five patients (14.7%) exhibited a best response of partial response as per RECIST 1.1 criteria, 9 (26.5%) stable disease, and 17 (50%) progressive disease: 3 patients did not have a follow-up scan as they discontinued treatment shortly after initiation due to clinical progression. The objective response rate was 14.7%, and disease control rate was 41.2%. Median progression-free survival was 1 month [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-1.46 months]; median overall survival (OS) from time of treatment initiation was 5.0 months (95% CI, 4.07-5.93 months), and median OS from diagnosis was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.79-16.21 months). The median duration of treatment was 1 month (range 0-10 months). Twenty-eight patients discontinued treatment for progression, four patients for toxicity, and two remain on treatment at the time of data cut-off. Twelve patients (35%) experienced grade 3 and 4 treatment-emergent toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: The ipilimumab and nivolumab regimen has modest activity in aggressive and heavily pretreated high-grade NENs who have progressed on prior cytotoxic chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Nivolumabe , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Ipilimumab/farmacologia , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/tratamento farmacológico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Nivolumabe/farmacologia , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA