The prevention of infection: 12 modifiable risk factors.

AIMS: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a serious complication that is associated with high morbidity and costs. The aim of this study was to prepare a systematic review to examine patient-related and perioperative risk factors that can be modified in an attempt to reduce the rate of PJI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for articles published between January 1990 and February 2018 with a combination of search terms to identify studies that dealt with modifiable risk factors for reducing the rate of PJI. An evidence-based review was performed on 12 specific risk factors: glycaemic control, obesity, malnutrition, smoking, vitamin D levels, preoperative Staphylococcus aureus screening, the management of anti-rheumatic medication, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, presurgical skin preparation, the operating room environment, irrigant options, and anticoagulation. RESULTS: Poor glycaemic control, obesity, malnutrition, and smoking are all associated with increased rates of PJI. Vitamin D replacement has been shown in preliminary animal studies to decrease rates of PJI. Preoperative Staphylococcus aureus screening and appropriate treatment results in decreased rates of PJI. Perioperative variables, such as timely and appropriate dosage of prophylactic antibiotics, skin preparation with chlorohexidine-based solution, and irrigation with dilute betadine at the conclusion of the operation, have all been associated with reduced rates of PJI. Similarly, aggressive anticoagulation and increased operating room traffic should be avoided to help minimize risk of PJI. CONCLUSION: PJI remains a serious complication of arthroplasty. Surgeons should be vigilant of the modifiable risk factors that can be addressed in an attempt to reduce the risk of PJI.

Effect of marital status on treatment and survival of extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Spousal support has been hypothesized as providing important psychosocial support for patients and as such has been noted to provide a survival advantage in a number of chronic diseases and cancers. However, the specific effect of marital status on survival in soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) of the extremity has not been explored in detail. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 7384 patients were evaluated for this study using a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry query for patients over 20 years old with extremity STS diagnosed between 2004 and 2009. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Gray's test after patients were stratified by marital status. The Fine and Gray model, a multivariable regression model, was used to assess whether marital status was an independent predictor of sarcoma specific death. Statistical significance was maintained at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Analysis of the SEER database showed that single patients were more likely to die of their STS and at a faster rate than married patients. No differences were noted in tumor size and tumor site on presentation between married and single patients. However, single patients presented with higher grade tumors more frequently (P = 0.013), received less radiotherapy (P < 0.001), and had less surgery carried out (P < 0.001), compared with their married peers. Regression analysis showed that after accounting for tumor size, grade, site, histology, use of radiotherapy, age, gender, region where the patients were from, and income, being single continued to serve as an independent predictor of sarcoma-specific death; P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: Overall survival is worse for single patients, when compared with married patients, with STS. Single patients do not undergo surgical resection or receive radiation therapy as frequently as their married counterparts. Social support systems and barriers to care should be evaluated at time of diagnosis and addressed in single patients to potentially improve survival outcomes.

Amputation for extremity soft tissue sarcoma does not increase overall survival: a retrospective cohort study.

To determine if amputation increases survival when compared to limb salvage surgery in patients with a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity when there is often a misconception among physicians and patients that ablative surgery eliminates local recurrence and increases overall survival. This retrospective cohort study assessed 278 patients with STS and compared 18 patients who had undergone amputations for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities to a comparative cohort of 260 patients who underwent limb salvage surgery during the same time period. Our limb salvage surgery (LSS) rate was 94% overall for soft tissue sarcomas with a median follow-up of 3.1 years. Patients undergoing amputations either had tumors that involved a critical neurovascular bundle (in particular nerve rather than vessel resection was more responsible for a decision toward ablation), or underlying bone or had neoplasms whose large size would require such an enormous resection that a functional limb would not remain. In comparing prognostic effects, mainly death due to sarcoma, distant metastasis and local recurrence, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between patients undergoing amputation to those undergoing limb salvage surgery (p > 0.05). While amputations do not increase overall survival in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity as compared to LSS, they are still a valuable option in a surgeon's arsenal. In particular, amputations can provide improved local control and symptomatic treatment in patients who might not be candidates for limb salvage surgery.